Bedard, Michkov, or Celebrini: Who would you build around?
- Thread starter dmcccdmn
- Start date
Higher goals per game, higher points per game, better all around player.
Strange post, at absolute worst it's been very close, at best Celebrini has been notably better thus far.
That said, I doubt he can keep this pace, I think the calder comes down to Hutson vs Michkov.
Lies
Michkov P/60 2.85 on 3rd line
Celebrini P/60 2.78 on 1st line
Bedard P/60 2.27 on 1st line
Michkov has scored at the highest rate and with a larger sample size. Exhale that chest homie
But none of those things are true?
Michkov has better defensive stats
Michkov has a better p/60 on 3rd line
Michkov owned Celebrini head to head
Michkov has xGF 9.9 vs Celebrini xGF 5.4, meaning Michkov has had terrible puck luck vs Celebrini being very lucky.
Watching them both play, it's not close. If you want to read simple stats and not watch hockey that's on you
Bedard is a winger, and you still take him over Celebrini. Center over winger is a general rule when the talents are close but in this case it's like taking Bergeron over Kucherov or Kaprizov, you just don't do it.
Except, they are.
Macklin Celebrini has 8 goals in 13 GP, a goals per game of 0.61.
Matvei Michkov has 9 goals in 23 GP, a goals per game of 0.39.
Celebrini has 13 points in 14 GP, good for a PPG of 0.92, Michkov 19 in 23, a PPG of 0.82
Bizzare response stating objective facts are "wrong", there was nothing subjective about the statistics I mentioned.
If you wish to value p/60 above actual goals scored, that's an interesting route to take, perhaps you should actually read the comments you respond to before jumping in next time.
Trying to convince people that the guy shooting 20% on the year is having "bad puck luck" is also quite an interesting take, particularly because a mere handful of NHLers managed this feat during the entire 2023-24 Season last year.
You are objectively wrong.
HeadLiceHatty
Registered User
Why respond to this guy, I’ve triggered him so hard he literally looks for my posts in other threads, absolutely delusional
JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,588
- 10,280
I don't agree with that.
Talent is an input, impact is an output.
I only care about the sustained impact, the output. A center has greater impact than a winger. At center, if Bedard reaches his ceiling, his overall impact will be greater than Celebrini at his ceiling. At wing, it will not.
Bedard isn't and never was a winger, his play style is that of an elite winger. Using him at Center hurts his ability, he's just not a 200 foot player
JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,588
- 10,280
Then he’ll never reach the overall on-ice impact of a Celebrini and the Blackhawks should be looking to fill their 1C position with great haste:
You wrote all of this just to be wrong again?
Context is very important.
Celebrini plays 20 minutes a night on the 1st line with Eklund (22 points) and Zetterlund (19 points) as his most common linemates, both of those guys have better play driving stats and suggest they boost Celebrini up
Michkov, who is scoring at a higher P/60 rate from the 3rd line getting 17:26 minutes plays with most common linemates of Frost (10 points) and Tippet (12 points), which michkov by far has the best play driving stats of the 3.
So.... Do you we go by your PPG rate or my P60 rate? i don't think we'll agree on either so lets just go by the REAL stats
Michkov has more goals
Michkov has double the assist
Michkov is a plus player on a minus 10 team
Michkov has more ESP
Michkov has more PPP
Michkov has better XGF stats
Michkov has better XGA stats
I mean, Celebrini has no REAL advantage on any REAL stats. And i'm sure you saw the game they played head to head?
This makes absolutely no sense. Celebrini will never have the impact a Kucherov or Kaprizov have on the game.
Toews was never as impactful as Kane despite what some Hawks fans told themselves years ago. No one is taking Bergeron over Kucherov.
EdmFlyersfan
Registered User
Bizarre is that you don't know math
Celebrini has 8 goals in 14 games which is 0.57 not 0.61
Celebrini has 13 points in 14 games which is 0.93 not 0.92
Michkov has 19 in 23 which is 0.83 not 0.82
You aren't even correct on your own numbers and games played my guy. get your life together.
In all fairness, if he was drafted in any other draft outside of the 23' draft and didn't have a contract he's going 1st overall, including the 24' draft.
Schennanigans
Registered User
JaegerDice
The mark of my dignity shall scar thy DNA
- Dec 26, 2014
- 25,588
- 10,280
Good lord, no.
Toews was measurably more impactful than Kane from 2009-2015, and indeed his impact was a huge reason the Blackhawks were so successful through that period .
Indeed the downfall of the Blackhawks was largely due to Toews impact dropping below Kane’s. Once Kane became the best player on the Blackhawks, and the player they relied most on, the team’s fate was sealed.
Like a star whose core had begun to produce iron, it was not a matter of if the Blackhawks would die with Kane as their best player, but how big the explosion would be.
Last edited:
"Macklin Celebrini has a higher PPG and GPG than Michkov thus far this season"
Please go into detail and tell me how either of these objectice facts are wrong, I can't wait for your response. Don't avoid the question, don't move the goal posts, acknowledge and respond to it.
Michkov has one more goal in 9 more games, he's produced less while playing easier minutes against inferior competition.
Michkov has more goals
Michkov has double the assist
Michkov is a plus player on a minus 10 team
Michkov has more ESP
Michkov has more PPP
Michkov has better XGF stats
Michkov has better XGA stats"
Stating this about a player who has literally played 65% more games than the other is wild. You also clearly have no idea how to implement advanced statistics, Michkov gets 75% ozone starts, Celebrini 10% less while conpeting against other teams top players entering tonight, in other words he plays against significantly superior competition at even strength, he's also nearly 2 full years younger, Michkov will be 20 years old within a couple weeks, which is exactly why I stated what I did at the end of my initial post, which you clearly didn't read.
I stated I expected Celebrini to cool off and Michkov, Hutson to compete for the calder, very clearly. Your miniscule XGA/XGF data holds no weight here, nor does pretending a player scoring on every 5th shot he puts on goal thus far in his rookie season is "unlucky", that's an absolutely absurd take.
I also agree, context is important.
So tell me
Player A has 9 goals, 10 assists in 23 games played. Good for a GPG of 0.39, a points per game of 0.82.
Player B has 8 goals, 5 assists in 14 games played, a GPG of 0.57, a points per game of 0.92.
Somebody says, now lets just call them "TimeZone" for anonymity purposes... "player B has the higher points per game, higher goals per game so far this Season"
Another individual chimes in, again we won't use names here, same logic applies in regards to anonymity, so we'll just call this person "Sasso09" and "Sasso09" says "No that's not true, you're wrong TimeZone"
Is "TimeZone" indeed wrong? Is 0.82 higher than 0.92? Is 0.39 higher than 0.57?
Just acknowledge and answer the question here please, don't deflect, be honest and answer the question.
Does player A or player B currently have the higher GPG and PPG? Is TimeZone right, or was Sasso correct?
HeadLiceHatty
Registered User
You’re reasoning with Neanderthals, everyone that watches puck and really gets it doesn’t actually think Celebrini is near Michkov offensively, let the 8 sharks fans go nuts lol.
The man who just told me 0.92 is not higher than 0.82 a mere hour ago is now suddenly a mathematician.
Imagine offering up a red herring and arguing about 0.4% that changes absolutely nothing in regards to the actual argument at hand instead of actually addressing the fact that you're attempting to argue that 0.82(oops big sorry 0.826) is higher than 0.92(oops I mean 0.928)
Good lord.
Oh good.
Now that you've identified yourself as the intellectual of the thread, maybe you can answer the question about GPG and PPG as well.
Waiting.
HeadLiceHatty
Registered User
Lmfao, you’re choosing not to read between the lines. Usage matters big dawg, choose to ignore facts and reasoning, it’s up to you to be a lunatic.
StrawHatEklund
Registered User
Says the clown that laugh reacted to 3 of my posts before I reacted to 1. You have no argument besides Michkov is better because “I say he is.” You’re the worst type of poster on this board. Just screeching over Michkov doing anything and so insecure over an NHL rookie that you crap on Celebrini because he is lighting it up. Talk about obsessed.Why respond to this guy, I’ve triggered him so hard he literally looks for my posts in other threads, absolutely delusional
Last edited:
StrawHatEklund
Registered User
Why respond to this guy, I’ve triggered him so hard he literally looks for my posts in other threads, absolutely delusional
He’s unstable. Literally cries about Celebrini getting any praise and hypes up Michkov over every little thing.
The irony is I quite literally stated at the bottom that I fully anticipate Michkov to have the better numbers at the end of the year, being as he's nearly 2 years older and playing easier minutes against inferior competition on a better team.
Instead of accept that he chose to go down the route of arguing literal objective facts.
You would think if you put this much energy into something, you could at least be good at it.
StrawHatEklund
Registered User
I didn’t lie about anything. Celebrini has played 2nd and 3rd line minutes. Michkov has 19 points in 23. Celebrini currently has 14 in 15. Celebrini is at a higher rate overall. And btw, you want to argue usage? 1st line minutes means you also face stiffer competition than 3rd line minutes
Agreed. Michkov may very well end the season with more points. But the usage argument is
fallacious because as you said, Michkov is playing easier minutes on a better team. Not to mention Celebrini doesn’t cheat for offense.
You're choosing to ignore basic questions, this is the guy who you just chose to side with btw.
PS : Yes, I agree usage matters, the 18 year old is playing harder minutes against tougher competion as an 18 year old, 10% difference in ozone starts is no joke, maybe you and your hero should learn how to implement p/60 properly.
Now answer the question, god forbid you get humiliated by a "Neanderthal" online by not even being able to answer a basic question.
Last edited:
HeadLiceHatty
Registered User
2 years older hahaha, grasp at the straws hahaha should I add Celebrini is already injury prone, hope he stays healthy enough to keep “outproducing” Michkov with massively favorable deployment
