OT: Bears & NFL Talk 87

Status
Not open for further replies.

RayP

Tf
Jan 12, 2011
94,103
17,878
I feel like he has had a poor year and without a contract, he certainly doesn't seem near as engaged. Last year he was a 1.


Guess it depends what you consider and expect out of a WR1.

To me he is a guy with WR1 stats at the end of the day but doesn’t come up big when you need him and puts up stats in garbage time on bad teams.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Scottkmlps

Idionym

Registered User
Apr 6, 2015
3,441
3,710
Chicago
Um yes or literally any other safety

Why would anyone want Eddie Jackson playing?

The idea that Eddie Jackson is worse than "literally any other safety" is hilarious. Dude sucks in the run game, but still provides value in the pass game. The idea that some random safety you sign off the street is better than that just shows how over-the-top negative you are. Which isn't news, I know, but holy crap dude have you ever thought about not overreacting and crying about everything?

Have you watched him at all the past 2 seasons? He cant tackle and iirc doesnt have a pick since 2019. Hes arguably the worst starter on the defense, and thats including some bad dbs.

I will bet you that he's better than any unsigned UDFA right now.
 

ClydeLee

Registered User
Mar 23, 2012
12,220
5,709
I like Todd Bowles hat with the color stripes around the TB flag... that's a positive of this game.
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,439
23,335
Chicagoland
Fields fumbles

Have you watched him at all the past 2 seasons? He cant tackle and iirc doesnt have a pick since 2019. Hes arguably the worst starter on the defense, and thats including some bad dbs.

Dont forget his effort on most plays is disgraceful

Remember when we dumped Leno while downgrading at both T spots. It was stupid to dump Leno for no reason and gut the already terrible depth at T
 

Blackhawkswincup

RIP Fugu
Jun 24, 2007
190,439
23,335
Chicagoland
The idea that Eddie Jackson is worse than "literally any other safety" is hilarious. Dude sucks in the run game, but still provides value in the pass game. .

What Jackson have you been watching? It sure as hell isn't Eddie Jackson

He has routinely been out of position or blown coverage literally multiple times every game. Almost every big play deep against this secondary over recent years has been a result of Jackson
 
  • Like
Reactions: hawksrule

madgoat33

Registered User
May 16, 2010
17,792
2,002
What Jackson have you been watching? It sure as hell isn't Eddie Jackson

He has routinely been out of position or blown coverage literally multiple times every game. Almost every big play deep against this secondary over recent years has been a result of Jackson
Yea i completely agree with bwc. He hasnt provided value in any facet.
 

Idionym

Registered User
Apr 6, 2015
3,441
3,710
Chicago
What Jackson have you been watching? It sure as hell isn't Eddie Jackson

He has routinely been out of position or blown coverage literally multiple times every game. Almost every big play deep against this secondary over recent years has been a result of Jackson

This is just false. Maybe you're not understanding that Jackson being in the vicinity when there's a big play mean it's his fault.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad