He was at Tulane. Had them a Top 25 OLFrom everything I've seen, Roushar seems like a fine choice. Good O-lines with NOLA, good O-line this year with Purdue.
Not seeing that anywhere on the internet.McCaskey died
Hasn't been officially reported yetNot seeing that anywhere on the internet.
Given where the current contenders are drafting like wash and buff at 29/30 the Bears pick at 10 is way more valuable.Myles Garrett has requested a trade because he wants to win, so that alone might be enough for him to say no to a trade to Chicago.
But if you can get Garrett for 2025 1st, 2025 2nd, 2026 2nd I'd probably be in favor of them doing something like that. Now is the time to spend money on big time players like Garrett and Trey Smith with CW being on his rookie deal.
Still leaves you with a 2nd round pick this year to address the offensive line, maybe go sign the center from Atlanta too.
Wonder who else has the draft ammo to get a guy like Garrett while also being a desirable a team in terms of winning.
On top of the albatross of Watson's contract, who keeps blowing out his acl cause he has to try and lick his own a**hole nowadaysGiven where the current contenders are drafting like wash and buff at 29/30 the Bears pick at 10 is way more valuable.
I mean if we are using the Mack deal as a comp it was Mack and a 2nd and 5th for 2 firsts, third and 6th then the offer of 10th plus 2 seconds is fairly close. Garrett is 2 years older than Mack was at the time. And Garrett would get a new contract upon arriving so there is that as well. Would the bears change both 2’s in place of 26 first and possibly a third? Thus ends up as 2 firsts and third.
Main issue for the browns is that Garrett is a $36 mill dead cap charge if moved prior to June 1. Already have $40 mill in dead cap on the books mainly from Cooper and smith.