4 Square! Thanks for the memory and laughs!
I used to be a master of the look away shot in 4 Square-LOL
OT: Bears & NFL Talk 103
- Thread starter No Fun Shogun
- Start date
I used to be a master of the look away shot in 4 Square-LOL
GIADF
Not A Mod
- Aug 17, 2024
- 2,005
- 2,322
Hard to imagine the Bears winning two games. I think thay means worst case scenario they end up picking 10th if they did manage to win 1 more to tie the Saints, and the Saints were to lose out at the same time.
I think the Bears lose the tiebreaker with the Jets who currently have the same record, so currently slotted for the 9th pick.
Two QBs and Hunter will be a lock to before the Bears pick, and probably the WR from Arizona.
I think the Bears lose the tiebreaker with the Jets who currently have the same record, so currently slotted for the 9th pick.
Two QBs and Hunter will be a lock to before the Bears pick, and probably the WR from Arizona.
No Fun Shogun
34-38-61-10-13-15
Scottkmlps
Registered User
Panzerspitze
Registered User
- Mar 4, 2010
- 5,067
- 1,059
Why in the universe would you target Keenan Allen 13 times a game? The guy wouldn't and shouldn't be on the roster next year. Another fourth-round pick well spent...
Backyard Hockey
Dealing With It
- Feb 13, 2015
- 14,814
- 5,677
Think about this. Poles’ term as GM included a 14 game losing streak and is now in the midst of an 8 game losing streak that will likely go to 11
In no universe should any NFL GM keep his job after that. It’s not even a discussion
Because he had to rack up 4 drops.
In no universe should any NFL GM keep his job after that. It’s not even a discussion
Because he had to rack up 4 drops.
GIADF
Not A Mod
- Aug 17, 2024
- 2,005
- 2,322
I was trying to figure that out too, but then stopped caring. It would be interesting to see someone watch the replays and see what Odunze and Moore are doing on these routes.
Not even going to mention Kmet in that sentence because I don't know why neither of our OCs refuse to target him. On pace for the fewest targets of his career this year with the exception of his rookie year.
Romang67
BitterSwede
They need to think long and hard about picking up a RB in the draft. Very strong RB class, and having a RB1 who can't reliably run between the tackles or pick up a yard isn't doable.
Romang67
BitterSwede
Having watched every single one of the QB School reviews of all offensive plays, the answer is very often that Allen is the #1 read or that Allen is the hot read. Issue that comes with that is that Allen as the #1 read wins slowly because he's slow.
Sure, Moore quits on routes, but a bigger issue is that he just doesn't really win on routes. Odunze wins inconsistently. Against zone, Allen has a feel for sitting down in between coverage, which Odunze doesn't as of yet.
Allen had a really good game against the Vikings last time. I'm not surprised to see him targeted so many times.
GIADF
Not A Mod
- Aug 17, 2024
- 2,005
- 2,322
No doubt. I'd be fine with them spending a 3rd rounder on one.
I've read that Campbell and Banks profile as guards. If true, then I really hope that's who they go with one of them.
One of those guys paired with Braxton Jones on the left side. Then if by some miracle you can sign Trey Smith to play RG next to Wright as the RT.... That has the makings of a damn good offensive line.
Romang67
BitterSwede
I feel like the only top rated OT in the draft who consistently profiles as an OT is the injured tackle out of OSU.
Yeah, I think grabbing a G out of the draft together with a G in FA (Smith if it's at all possible, otherwise possibly Becton if you think he won't be another Nate Davis). The only issue then is that you're still missing a C.
Romang67
BitterSwede
I understand that people are pissed about Kramer's forgetting to report, but I have no idea why people are acting as if using Kramer as a fullback in front of both Johnson and Swift has been a guaranteed short yardage success up until yesterday. The only time it didn't work was when they handed Kramer the ball. It's been more automatic than a QB sneak or the tush push this season.
It's a good play. It just didn't work yesterday because of a mental error.
It's a good play. It just didn't work yesterday because of a mental error.
Romang67
BitterSwede
I'm just gonna do some more ranting about the media:
Doug Kramer thing, see above.
No, you don't pick up guaranteed starters in the 3rd round. That's not how this works. The hit rate is sub 20%. Poles has been atrocious in the 3rd round, and he's not even statistically unusually bad in that round after 3 drafts. I spent one minute looking this up yesterday. That's how easy it is to double check.
No, your investment with a top 10 pick on an OT should not be expected to be an All-Pro level player. That's not how this works. Look at first round picks on OT over the past 10 years and how they've done. Yes, some are All-Pros. Some are high level starters. Some never reached the level Darnell Wright is playing at. You pick OTs early in the draft because that's where you find capable players.
Do your damned jobs. I don't care if a random fan on a forum is incorrect about these things, but this is literally your livelihood. Is it too much to ask that you look into these things before your spread your misinformed nonsense to the masses that trust in you to not be wrong?
Doug Kramer thing, see above.
No, you don't pick up guaranteed starters in the 3rd round. That's not how this works. The hit rate is sub 20%. Poles has been atrocious in the 3rd round, and he's not even statistically unusually bad in that round after 3 drafts. I spent one minute looking this up yesterday. That's how easy it is to double check.
No, your investment with a top 10 pick on an OT should not be expected to be an All-Pro level player. That's not how this works. Look at first round picks on OT over the past 10 years and how they've done. Yes, some are All-Pros. Some are high level starters. Some never reached the level Darnell Wright is playing at. You pick OTs early in the draft because that's where you find capable players.
Do your damned jobs. I don't care if a random fan on a forum is incorrect about these things, but this is literally your livelihood. Is it too much to ask that you look into these things before your spread your misinformed nonsense to the masses that trust in you to not be wrong?
