McDrai
Registered User
- Mar 29, 2009
- 24,172
- 21,405
Sounds like something my girlfriend’s younger sister would listen to. Whatever floats their boat though lol
Maybe it looked worse on TV but in person I thought the first period shot count flattered the kings. Which natural stat trick agrees with me on that too. We out chances then and had more high danger chances.You could be right about the effect of overtime.
That first period though...they could have easily been down 4 - 0. They were giving up odd man rush after odd man rush...turning the puck over time and time again. Ugly to watch.
How hard is it for a championship caliber team to actually start playing at the opening faceoff?
I just dont understand why this team hasnt learned that lesson yet.
They really do need a 60 minute game starting in game 5.
A small reason our start was so bad was the line combos. The Drai, Pod, Arvy line just isn't it.You could be right about the effect of overtime.
That first period though...they could have easily been down 4 - 0. They were giving up odd man rush after odd man rush...turning the puck over time and time again. Ugly to watch.
How hard is it for a championship caliber team to actually start playing at the opening faceoff?
I just dont understand why this team hasnt learned that lesson yet.
They really do need a 60 minute game starting in game 5.
Klingberg played 10 minutes in overtime wow
Yes, LAK shot everything on Net because they know our goalies are ass (I was impressed with Calvin, 2 bad goals though)Maybe it looked worse on TV but in person I thought the first period shot count flattered the kings. Which natural stat trick agrees with me on that too. We out chances then and had more high danger chances.
It seemed like almost all of their shots were mostly perimeter or came off shaky line changes.
The early penalty was rough and didn’t help frame things.
Second period was bad though. We didn’t get many chances and all our possession was kept to the outside.
The first imho and analytically was deceptive. Yeah they were out shot but LA blocked a ton of shots. I think going into the 3rd LA had 16 more blocked shots than us, which definitely affected the shot count.
Going into the third chances were 19-18 LA and high danger were 9-6 LA.
Only a couple actually rough odd man chances. I don’t think they played bad defensively, our offence is what struggled in the first 2 periods.
You are partially right on the first part. The only goal I thought was bad was the first one other than that they were fine. Arvy made another bad falling down turnover and his ice time was basically cut from then on.Yes, LAK shot everything on Net because they know our goalies are ass (I was impressed with Calvin, 2 bad goals though)
Our first two periods were bad because the Line combos were ass. Nuge and Mcdavid is meh and the Drai line with Arvy is even worse
We really just have terrible pro scouts.Podkolzin and Arvidsson were again relegated to 4th line duty.
It’s insane how often our 2nd line wingers from the regular season end up relegated to the 4th line eventuslly in the playoffs.
On Arvidsson sure. Podkolzin is good for the 4th line so can’t really fault the scouts on that one.We really just have terrible pro scouts.
Let's hope they keep the forward combos the same! There needs to be more talk about this....You are partially right on the first part. The only goal I thought was bad was the first one other than that they were fine. Arvy made another bad falling down turnover and his ice time was basically cut from then on.
The forward combos for sure and again, the moment Knoblauch breaks up Nurse and Bouchard everything cleaned up giveaway wise.
Never forget his stupid challenge on the tying goal last game.Doing the classic Tortorella / Keenan schtick to take the heat off his players after gassing 2 late 3rd period leads in a row.
Plus he’s an idiot.
That hard drive to the net almost went in. Thought it ticked the crossbar. There was space.He's been actually been sneakily good offensively, he has 3 points in 4 games so far.
Couldnt disagree with the bolded more. The score in the first period (and half of the 2nd) flattered the Oilers big time.Maybe it looked worse on TV but in person I thought the first period shot count flattered the kings. Which natural stat trick agrees with me on that too. We out chances then and had more high danger chances.
It seemed like almost all of their shots were mostly perimeter or came off shaky line changes.
The early penalty was rough and didn’t help frame things.
Second period was bad though. We didn’t get many chances and all our possession was kept to the outside.
The first imho and analytically was deceptive. Yeah they were out shot but LA blocked a ton of shots. I think going into the 3rd LA had 16 more blocked shots than us, which definitely affected the shot count.
Going into the third chances were 19-18 LA and high danger were 9-6 LA.
Only a couple actually rough odd man chances. I don’t think they played bad defensively, our offence is what struggled in the first 2 periods.
I can see the line combos affecting the offence but on D its all about desire and a commitment to playing the right way. There just seemed to be little to no attention to detail.A small reason our start was so bad was the line combos. The Drai, Pod, Arvy line just isn't it.
Leon Mcdavid Perry
Kane Nuge Hyman
Frederic Henrique Brown
^^^ Seems to be the answer. Watch Knobs break it up.
Yeah he hit the iron on that one I believe. It was a great net drive.That hard drive to the net almost went in. Thought it ticked the crossbar. There was space.
The Kings play what the Vancouver Cucks system of last year. Pre-mature ejaculation and then get caved.Ya the Oilers can’t keep falling behind.
That being said the Kings approach isn’t sustainable either. Just running a really short bench and going balls to the walls the first 2 periods. They tucker out.
I disagree with you. Oilers had a post and Hyman / Drai missed wide open nets.Couldnt disagree with the bolded more. The score in the first period (and half of the 2nd) flattered the Oilers big time.
I am not sure how you could have missed the 5 or 6 odd man rushes the Kings had.
The HDSC stats are bogus...you pretty much have to do your own evaluation and by my eye the Kings dominated in HDSC's in the first half of the game.
The Oilers dominated the 2nd half of the game...icluding O/T.
Even the post game podcasts are validating that perspective.
I'm a big fan of Podkolzin, he forechecks well and is hard on the puck. He gets to good places for opportunities but doesn't have much finish... I mean if he did he'd be getting much more than the 1MM we pay him.On Arvidsson sure. Podkolzin is good for the 4th line so can’t really fault the scouts on that one.
His outlet passes. Wowza!While his speed is gone, his calmness and poise with the puck on his stick can not be overstated.
He has a calming effect back there because he always gives people the puck in a good spot, and puts it on their tape.
Might just end up being a beastly signing.
Remember, when we first saw him he was coming off a LONG layoff. It looks like he's back to game speed.
Don’t be a funsucker.We aren't winning shit with this defense.
Cripes.. that was ugly