Post-Game Talk: Baby shark (doo doo doo doo doo doo)

3 stars

  • Panarin

    Votes: 13 52.0%
  • Laf

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Vinny T

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • Kreider

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Kakko

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Vesey

    Votes: 12 48.0%
  • Carrick

    Votes: 1 4.0%
  • Cuylle

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Chytil #rip

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Edstrom

    Votes: 5 20.0%
  • Smith

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Mika

    Votes: 6 24.0%
  • Fox

    Votes: 2 8.0%
  • Schneider

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Lindgren

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Jones

    Votes: 3 12.0%
  • Miller

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Trouba

    Votes: 0 0.0%
  • Shesty

    Votes: 6 24.0%

  • Total voters
    25
Status
Not open for further replies.
IMG_1728.gif
 
Ok, so let's see.

Complain after:

Lose and look bad analytically: Check

Win and look bad analytically: Check

Lose and look good analytically: Check

And finally today is my favorite, win and look good analytically: Check

So this board has all of the complaining bases covered.
 
Ok, so let's see.

Complain after:

Lose and look bad analytically: Check

Win and look bad analytically: Check

Lose and look good analytically: Check

And finally today is my favorite, win and look good analytically: Check

So this board has all of the complaining bases covered.

They beat a bottom 3 team in a 32 team league, at home, by a goal and cheek clench at the end of the game. And SJS hit multiple posts. And they didn't start on time, again.

The complaining is warranted and well deserved. If they played like 27 other teams in the league they lose
 
What the f*** is up with Miller man? I once thought this guy could be like Hedman.
>spits on Doughty, gets suspended
>out for mental health reasons, misses two games
>injures the most fragile dude on the roster with a braindead no-awareness play
It's no coincidence at this point he's got severe issues and is a detriment to this roster.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RangerLifer
They beat a bottom 3 team in a 32 team league, at home, by a goal and cheek clench at the end of the game. And SJS hit multiple posts. And they didn't start on time, again.

The complaining is warranted and well deserved. If they played like 27 other teams in the league they lose

So winning by a goal is bad because goals matter but beating the Red Wings by 4 goals is bad because goals don't matter.
 
Kind of surprised to hear we looked good analytically. Outside of about 75% of the 2nd period I wouldn't have thought there'd be much that was positive
 
I'm glad they found a way to win against a team that's in their bracket, as far as 5v5 play goes.

I'm glad they didn't embarrass themselves (though they almost did). But I'm not gonna celebrate that, especially when we probably just lost our only good player besides panarin this year.
 
  • Like
Reactions: RangerLifer
Kind of surprised to hear we looked good analytically. Outside of about 75% of the 2nd period I wouldn't have thought there'd be much that was positive

Ok, so maybe we need a third criterion, eye test and a 4th strength of team, and finally winning by a wide margin.

We will complain unless we do all of the following:

1) Win

2) Look good analytically

3) Pass the eye test

4) Beat a great team

5) Win in blowout fashion
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad