Tommy Shelby
Registered User
- Feb 26, 2012
- 7,861
- 5,503
He got one f***ing game. And was actually solid after the first period.Georgiev failed, Annunen failed, Kahkonen failed. I think the answer is obvious. Recall Trent Miner.
Kahk got one game! If Bednar had the same mentality for his shitty 6th/7th defensemen as he had for his goaltending he might've been given at least a chance to show something.Georgiev failed, Annunen failed, Kahkonen failed. I think the answer is obvious. Recall Trent Miner.
I mean Nate has gone like 7 or 8 games or something like that without a goalWe have three guys in the top-10 for scoring. There's only so much you can ask. Sometimes you need a depth goal. Sometimes you need to win a game 2-1 or 3-2. This team can't.
Yep, we need a new goaler soon.Legendary rubbish performance by Georgie. Every time the puck goes around his feet, it's an auto goal.
Yeah I’m sorry he’s had more misses than hits and Landeskog’s health has hamstrung this teamHow about the deadline the year before that? Or this offseason?
Yep.Also, Pete DeBoer just f***ing owns Bednar.
PDB makes adjustments during periods in games against us and we can never respond.
From what I can tell,.Bednar doesn't know what to do. The Avs have to play his system perfectly to have a chance. Our special teams are insanely predictable and have been for a long time.That f***er definitely has the perfect Anti-Bednar system.
If Bednar goes, I want David Carle.Who you gonna grab? Boudreau? The problem with removing Bednar is you're getting rid of a known thing and with the track record on coaches this club as had, we could do a lot worse.
IMO this is a roster problem. Bednar coaches the way we want to play. The roster isn't deep or skilled enough, nor can it stop pucks.
Shit...get Varly to come back with St. Patrick. He's not the answer as a starter, but at least I like him.We should trade Bednar+2nd for Roy.
I'm just saying, yeah, MacK has cooled off for sure. But he's the least of this team's problemsI mean Nate has gone like 7 or 8 games or something like that without a goal
He's the reason we got MacK. That's good enough for me.Roy isn't a good coach
The team can. The goalies can't. The team would need to win 5-4 or 6-5. That is extremely hard to do consistently.We have three guys in the top-10 for scoring. There's only so much you can ask. Sometimes you need a depth goal. Sometimes you need to win a game 2-1 or 3-2. This team can't.
From what I can tell,.Bednar doesn't know what to do. The Avs have to play his system perfectly to have a chance. Our special teams are insanely predictable and have been for a long time.
I'm still legit pissed. Kähkönen had been the better goalie compared to Georgiev until they came. I can't for the life of me understand wherever the f*** @henchman21 or some others pull the opinion that Georgiev has the higher ceiling. No he f***ing doesn't, and didn't. Kähkönen has been better than Georgiev in multiple levels of competition.Kahk got one game! If Bednar had the same mentality for his shitty 6th/7th defensemen as he had for his goaltending he might've been given at least a chance to show something.
Which shows exactly why Bednar should be fired. It's 29 doesn't carry we lose, there is no strategy what so ever.I mean Nate has gone like 7 or 8 games or something like that without a goal
Quenville, sitting around waiting for that call.If we fired bednar, who would be interim?
I think this org is kidding itself. Look around the league. How many other orgs have similar challenges of a mate fvcking your org into the playoffs, twice, a captain who can't play a game for 3 years, a goalie cf that spans 2+ years and shows no sign, or willingness to try and make better.. 2c, we don't need no stinkin' 2c... and on and on.I appreciate your enthusiasm, and I really like Landeskog. It's unfortunate.
Nate has gone cold exactly when Rantanen was taken aside from him. But I guess we shouldn't re-sign this guy?Which shows exactly why Bednar should be fired. It's 29 doesn't carry we lose, there is no strategy what so ever.