Avs44
Registered User
- May 16, 2011
- 22,040
- 11,075
If it's just Coyle this is awful. Wow. Gave Byram away from basically nothing in the end, eh?
No we don't. That's terrible asset management. I'm all good with throwing all the futures into making the team better...does this actually make the team better? It makes the team older and potentially the same, if not worse.We still win lol
I mean I’d take it, but let’s wait and see.No I think it is legit those three for Coyle
Yes it makes the team better lol. You can’t go back I time and undo Byram for Mittelstadt. People might thing it’s terrible asset management but what would be worse is keeping Mittelstadt and not having Charlie Coyle.No we don't. That's terrible asset management. I'm all good with throwing all the futures into making the team better...does this actually make the team better? It makes the team older and potentially the same, if not worse.
Would've rather just hold onto him than do whatever this isWas Mitts value really that low?
That was before Zellers and a 2nd was announcedDidn't Friedman tweet that there's more involved?
So moving into the playoffs:
Lehkonen - MacKinnon - Necas
Drouin - Nelson - Nichushkin
Colton - Drury - Coyle
Kiviranta - Kelly - O'Connor
Toews - Makar
Girard - Manson
Lindgren - Malinski
Blackwood
He did, but that "more" came from the AvsDidn't Friedman tweet that there's more involved?
Didn't Friedman tweet that there's more involved?
Didn't say it was more from BostonDidn't Friedman tweet that there's more involved?
Problem with that is I don't believe any of Kiviranta, Kelly, or O'Connor should be on a 3rd line, whereas I think Drury can be and Coyle has played RW for a lot of years in his career, too.Coyle 3C. Drury 4C. I like it though.