- Oct 24, 2008
- 25,256
- 40,647
He's 100% the best goalie we've had since Varlamov.
Good move to get this done early. Wait longer and his value will almost certainly have gone up.
That’s like ordering 2nds at Arby’s because your last 3 meals came from a dumpster.He's 100% the best goalie we've had since Varlamov.
The Avs don’t treat goaltenders like other teams do. They see it like running backs in the NFL. Often interchangeable. The AVS aren’t getting any of the top legitimate goalies, and all the rest are all over the place in terms of quality from year to year.You cant be serious? Keumper was pretty damn good for your Avs
It's been 4 games, rushing to extend him is pretty dumb IMO
What? They literally just acquired both Blackwood and Wedgewood. Why on earth would they then go out and rotate out Wedgewood AGAIN after just acquiring him? He only has 1.5 years left on his deal.Doesn't make a ton of sense but depends on the number. Guess they could dump Wedgewood in the summer and bring in another 1b type.
He gave them 4 good games so they're paying him already
Considering Blackwood has a -29.5 GSAA in the 4 years before this year (82 games with NJ and 44 games with San Jose), I'm not exactly sure why Colorado is rushing to give him an extension. Unless he's coming in cheap I don't see why they don't just wait until March or so, when he'll have a larger sample size of games.
This reminds me of when the Oilers gave Koskinen a decent sized deal because he was good for them for half a season, and he proceeded to be terrible for the majority of that deal.
You cant be serious? Keumper was pretty damn good for your Avs
It's been 4 games, rushing to extend him is pretty dumb IMO
Kuemper's one year in Denver resulted in him finishing 5th in GSAx and 5th in SV%.You cant be serious? Keumper was pretty damn good for your Avs
Kuemper's one year in Denver resulted in him finishing 5th in GSAx and 5th in SV%.
Varlamov's best season was in 2014 when he finished 2nd in GSAx and 6th in SV%.
In Kuemper's one season he was marginally less impactful than Varlamov's best season during his entire tenure. It amazes me how little Avs fans know about their own team, but at the same time claim they're all experts. It's pretty funny.
There were tons of Avs fans saying they trusted Georgiev more than Kuemper after the Cup year. They're nuts.
He was stellar in the regular season. Then injured his eye in the playoffs and was pretty rough. Recency bias also plays a factor.Kuemper's one year in Denver resulted in him finishing 5th in GSAx and 5th in SV%.
Varlamov's best season was in 2014 when he finished 2nd in GSAx and 6th in SV%.
In Kuemper's one season he was marginally less impactful than Varlamov's best season during his entire tenure. It amazes me how little Avs fans know about their own team, but at the same time claim they're all experts. It's pretty funny.
There were tons of Avs fans saying they trusted Georgiev more than Kuemper after the Cup year. They're nuts.
That's why I presented the GSAx numbers. You have a point with SV% only.Compare defense front of them. Not close.
That's why I presented the GSAx numbers. You have a point with SV% only.
Ah, so you're more insightful than the stats like everyone else on HF.Yeah saw those games. Comparing the best Varly season to Kuemper with Colorado is stupid.