Bednar's completely unacceptable answer points directly at the problem, yet people on this forum consistently miss the point:
The Bednar System is not an effective NHL strategy at this point. It's a pretty good system in the minors, where you have young guys filled with adrenaline and testosterone. Add 1 or 2 elite minor league players and it is easy to win a championship. Sure, the Avs won a cup, but with a younger team and guys like Kadri who go at 100% all the time ( frequently to Kadri's detriment, but that is another thread.)
1) Not for a single day in his Avs tenure has Bednar had an answer when the opposition parks the bus. Not a single game; not a single period.
2) In order for the 'system' to work, all 19 players must be a perfect fit. Only an imbecile would assume that Middleton can jump into the play behind the offensive net the same way Makar does. Hell, Toews can't even do it. If the roster doesn't fit the system - at least in the salary cap era - it is the system which needs to change.
3) For Christ's sake, stop the freaking Bednar Blender. Continuity and predictability are what make good NHL teams. If a team wants to win, every pass must be on the tape. That is really hard when a single player has as many as 5 linemates in a single game. Pee Wee coaches recognize this. Why doesn't Bednar?
4) What the hell goes on in practice? All I see are silly little skating drills. Perhaps spend...say... 10 minutes practicing face-offs or clearing the D zone? I was happy to hear Ryker criticize PP face-offs last night ( not to mention the entry strategy.) Ryker was good at this in the studio, but must have gotten a message from above to increase the homerism. In basketball, every team ( besides the Nuggets apparently) have the player practice 100+ free throws in every practice. The best baseball batteries spend hours studying the tendencies of hitters. Again, never for a day has a Bednar NHL team been close to average on face-offs. Kadri in overtime was hilarious. Sub in for the face-off, win it, then run off the ice because Bednar could not produce a player who could both win a face-off AND play in OT.
5) Bednar gets outcoached every single game of every season. Sometimes, the pure superiority of Mack and Makar hide that fact. But once the initial puck drops, other coaches adjust during play, and obviously between periods. The Avs? Bednar simply says they need to play harder. This is beginning to sound like the old, "They didn't show up on time" nonsense.
Seriously, can anyone point to a single element in the game - except the 'System'- in which Bednar has contributed? I don't want to hear about winning at every level. Minor League hockey is an entirely different animal than NHL hockey. Those of you old enough to remember the hockey Rockies might ( or probably not) remember a guy named Lou Nistico. He played 3 NHL games and sucked in all of them. But he was an amazing point-per-game guy for the Mohawk Valley Comets ( now Utica Comets) of the NAHL. Minor league teams could ride Nistico. On NHL and WHA teams, he was lost. The two games are different, so what Bednar did in the ECHL means nothing to me. He hung out on the bench while the Cup team caught lightning in a bottle, and that is the problem. This team - even with the Nuke nonsense - has a roster good enough to be in the SC Final 2 or 3 times. It looks to me like the core of this team will likely only make one appearance. That is on the coach. At absolute minimum, Bennett and Pratt need to go, in order to give Bednar some good ideas.