Auston Matthews ranks 10th on NHL.com Top 16 Forwards for the 2020-21 Season

  • Xenforo Cloud has upgraded us to version 2.3.6. Please report any issues you experience.
Seriously? I’m sorry but neither were that dominant to justify either of those contracts. Matthews due to term should have been no more than 10.5-11 max. Marner as a RW should have been 9.5 Max again. It may not seem like much but an extra 1.5-2 million in cap space is the difference between making the playoffs and bowing out in the first round again. Add another 4-500K for Nylander and we have a pretty decent player.
I thought the best comparable for Marner was the contract Nikita Kucherov signed which was 8 years and $9.5 million AAV since he was coming off a 100 point season when he signed that. Marner just had a 94 point season in 2018-19 and the fact both of them play Right Wing.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JT AM da real deal
Why because our stars expect to get paid before doing anything?

Because he is the second highest paid NHLer and hasn’t come close to being the second or third best player in the NHL?

In Toronto the media is our own worst enemy. Everybody talking about OS of 14 million per. For Christ sakes they haven’t even won a playoff series and we hand them anything they want and the fans and media are just as complicit. TML brass should have a rule of thumb that unless a player is the second coming of Gretzky or Orr it’s a 3 year bridge to prove that they are worth it after their ELC.

You want to know why basing the value of a contract on a subjective best player list is stupid?
 
Seriously? I’m sorry but neither were that dominant to justify either of those contracts. Matthews due to term should have been no more than 10.5-11 max. Marner as a RW should have been 9.5 Max again. It may not seem like much but an extra 1.5-2 million in cap space is the difference between making the playoffs and bowing out in the first round again. Add another 4-500K for Nylander and we have a pretty decent player.

Feel free to list all of the players in the NHL that averaged over half a goal per game in their age 18-20 seasons.
 
Last edited:
I just wish our guy was paid in line with the rest of the guys outside of the top 3...

Matthews: 11.6
Draisaitl: 11.3
Kucherov: 9.5
Ovechkin: 9.5
Pastrnak: 6.5
Panarin: 11.6
Kane: 10.5
Bergeron: 6.8
Eichel: 10.0
Point: 6.75
Malkin: 9.5
Marchand: 6.1
Petterson: ELC

I completely understand cap percentage / when the contract was signed plays a huge role here, but it's still a tough pill to swallow in this flat cap environment.

The timing of the pandemic hurts, but there is no way the Leafs could have predicted that. Just shit timing.
 
You want to know why basing the value of a contract on a subjective best player list is stupid?

I am basing his contract value on comparables not some stupid list put out by the media. Neither of them deserved the AAV or term they got-should have been longer.
 
I am basing his contract value on comparables not some stupid list put out by the media. Neither of them deserved the AAV or term they got-should have been longer.

I am still waiting for the list of players who averaged over a half a goal per game in their age 18 to 20 seasons in the NHL.
 
Sorry to be a bummer here but if he is the 10th best forward in the NHL that is unacceptable IMO. He is the second highest paid forward and I expect him top be top 5. Anything less than that and the team, the fans and he should be upset and that is putting it lightly.

He should have never gotten the deal he did and hopefully both he and Mitch take this into consideration when and if they sign new deals with us.

Also just for clarity, your initial argument was based on a, "stupid list put out by the media."
 
Feel free to list all of the players in the NHL that averaged over half a goal per game in their age 18-21 seasons.

Do you get paid on what you have done or will do. Guy prior to his last season of his ELC had never broken 100 points, or 90 or 80, he’ll even 70 yet he deserves to be the second highest paid player in the NHL?

Please feel free to join my HR at my job, looking to get overpaid based on projections alone. Not results.

:thumbu:
 
Do you get paid on what you have done or will do. Guy prior to his last season of his ELC had never broken 100 points, or 90 or 80, he’ll even 70 yet he deserves to be the second highest paid player in the NHL?

Please feel free to join my HR at my job, looking to get overpaid based on projections alone. Not results.

:thumbu:
Did Jack Eichel deserves a $10 million contract extension when he signed it? At that time he only had 56 and 57 point seasons during his first two years in Buffalo.
 
I thought the best comparable for Marner was the contract Nikita Kucherov signed which was 8 years and $9.5 million AAV since he was coming off a 100 point season when he signed that. Marner just had a 94 point season in 2018-19 and the fact both of them play Right Wing.
I did too for contract basis but overall I take Kucherov all day every day over Mitch without blinking an eye ... Kuch has a bullet accurate shot and his straight line skating far exceeds Mitch but both can twirl in a phone booth and Mitch may have a little more vision and passing skill
 
Seriously? I’m sorry but neither were that dominant to justify either of those contracts.
They were both dominant enough to justify their contracts. People don't seem to realize this due to an overreliance on exclusively raw points mixed with their unusually low PP time, especially relative to stars of the early cap era. The pre-signing periods for Matthews and Marner would rank better in the cap era than where they would rank in terms of biggest post-ELC contracts (adjusted for term). The contract thing is massively overblown, either by people not understanding contract valuation, or by people intentionally excluding critical context.
 
I did too for contract basis but overall I take Kucherov all day every day over Mitch without blinking an eye ... Kuch has a bullet accurate shot and his straight line skating far exceeds Mitch but both can twirl in a phone booth and Mitch may have a little more vision and passing skill
Since Kucherov has played 7 NHL seasons and Marner has only played 4 NHL seasons, shouldn't he be ahead of him or a better player based on that?

I also agree Kucherov has an accurate shot. I went to the Leafs vs Lightning game in Tampa Bay during the 2018-19 season in December 2018, when Toronto lost 4-1 despite getting 49 shots on net. Anyway one of the goals scored by Tampa was a one timer from Kucherov where it looked like Frederik Andersen made a fantastic glove save. However it was reviewed and it turns out his glove was across the goal line when he caught the puck and he was awarded with a goal.
 
Since Kucherov has played 7 NHL seasons and Marner has only played 4 NHL seasons, shouldn't he be ahead of him or a better player based on that?

I also agree Kucherov has an accurate shot. I went to the Leafs vs Lightning game in Tampa Bay during the 2018-19 season in December 2018, when Toronto lost 4-1 despite getting 49 shots on net. Anyway one of the goals scored by Tampa was a one timer from Kucherov where it looked like Frederik Andersen made a fantastic glove save. However it was reviewed and it turns out his glove was across the goal line when he caught the puck and he was awarded with a goal.
Da problem with Tampa is Florida state tax ... there is ZERO tax paid in Florida so guys take less and net same after tax $$$ in their pocket ... Cirelli team listening to 5.5M per from Steve Y and that translates to 4.7M in Florida ... i hate to say it but reality is it has to be taken into consideration ... year after year guys are signing for Florida tax adjusted AAV's which are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP ... do you honestly think we here in Toronto would get NHL's voted #4 defensive forward of year for 4.7M for 3 years? A #2 centre, and a top 5 #2 centre in league? ... as i have said in past this CBA has many issues but now that sponsors $$$ can't buy us out of issues likely for next 3-4 years this TAX problem is gonna hurt us
 
Da problem with Tampa is Florida state tax ... there is ZERO tax paid in Florida so guys take less and net same after tax $$$ in their pocket ... Cirelli team listening to 5.5M per from Steve Y and that translates to 4.7M in Florida ... i hate to say it but reality is it has to be taken into consideration ... year after year guys are signing for Florida tax adjusted AAV's which are CHEAP CHEAP CHEAP ... do you honestly think we here in Toronto would get NHL's voted #4 defensive forward of year for 4.7M for 3 years? A #2 centre, and a top 5 #2 centre in league? ... as i have said in past this CBA has many issues but now that sponsors $$$ can't buy us out of issues likely for next 3-4 years this TAX problem is gonna hurt us
Do you honestly think GM's of the other teams who are not the Lightning and Panthers care about the tax situation in Florida? Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way but if a GM see's Kucherov's $9.5 million AAV for 8 years and wants their player to sign that same deal or a very similar one, does he say oh no the Lightning have that tax advantage and I guess were screwed here.
 
Do you honestly think GM's of the other teams who are not the Lightning and Panthers care about the tax situation in Florida? Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way but if a GM see's Kucherov's $9.5 million AAV for 8 years and wants their player to sign that same deal or a very similar one, does he say oh no the Lightning have that tax advantage and I guess were screwed here.
It is not about GMs it is da agents who explain it very very clearly to all da GMs ... da math around these deals today is extremely detailed and does complete tax calculations down to da dollar ... days of old where you had a face to face blow by blow negotiation are way over
 
Navada-Florida-Texas-Tennessee-Washington are the states without a state income tax yet only 1 team got discounts from there players and this is now being used as them having an unfair advantage compared to the rest of the league .

Tampa did a good job getting some of there players to take less but it had zero to do with not having a income state tax .
 
Last edited:
Do you honestly think GM's of the other teams who are not the Lightning and Panthers care about the tax situation in Florida? Maybe I'm looking at this the wrong way but if a GM see's Kucherov's $9.5 million AAV for 8 years and wants their player to sign that same deal or a very similar one, does he say oh no the Lightning have that tax advantage and I guess were screwed here.

We also offer significant advantages that the majority of the league cannot match. However unlike the Lightning/Panthers, we don't seem to benefit from that at all via getting better contracts.

One is endorsements. Tavares made 1.7M in endorsements, Marner 2M in endorsements, and Matthews 2.3M in endorsements, compared to Karlsson, Panarin, Seguin, Price, etc all making $500K or less in endorsements. Only McDavid, Crosby, and Ovechkin make more in endorsements.

Another is the signing bonuses. Marner gets something like ~41M out of 61M paid before the season starts in the 3rd year of his contract (i.e. when he's played ~33% of the contract, he's already been paid ~66% of the contract). This is significant value, because he can invest that earlier and make millions of extra dollars off of it. Players want this from the teams. In the give and take of a negotiation, this should lead to longer term deals and/or lower caphits. Instead, we just seem to give absolutely everything (NMC, deals that take players right to or just past free agency, very high caphits, maximizing early signing bonuses, etc) while providing a unique environment to make an extra several million in endorsements that wouldn't be available in other marks while getting nothing in return.

On top of all of that, it's not even like the tax advantageous teams are the only ones getting better deals. Pastrnak, Gaudreau, Aho, Scheifele, Ehlers, Konecny, Provorov, Larkin, MacKinnon, etc aren't playing in super low tax jurisdictions.
 
Navada-Florida-Texas-Tennessee-Washington are the states without a state income tax yet only 1 team got discounts from there players and this is now being used as them having an unfair advantage compared to the rest of the league .

Tampa did a good job getting some of there players to take less but it had zero to do with having a state tax .
I will ask Rocks for his kids powerpoint sheet from Tampa but I am told it is very exact down to a dollar an EXACT tax number so he made exactly same $$$ as he would in Detroit ... now Tampa has drafted and developed really really well too (best in league) but they are utilizing Florida tax situation to da nines in negotiations with their guys to take their discounts ... you are kidding yourself if you think guys take less because of team ... it is too hard to make it (virtually impossible) and it costs a MINT today to make it so families in many cases sacrificed way too much and these kids know it ... hockey has always been an expensive sport but it used to be a cops/fireman's kids from Mimico with a stay at home mom could scrape by and still make it ... those days are over .. today it is $100,000+ minimum lottery ticket and that is with a ton of help
 
We also offer significant advantages that the majority of the league cannot match. However unlike the Lightning/Panthers, we don't seem to benefit from that at all via getting better contracts.

One is endorsements. Tavares made 1.7M in endorsements, Marner 2M in endorsements, and Matthews 2.3M in endorsements, compared to Karlsson, Panarin, Seguin, Price, etc all making $500K or less in endorsements. Only McDavid, Crosby, and Ovechkin make more in endorsements.

Another is the signing bonuses. Marner gets something like ~41M out of 61M paid before the season starts in the 3rd year of his contract (i.e. when he's played ~33% of the contract, he's already been paid ~66% of the contract). This is significant value, because he can invest that earlier and make millions of extra dollars off of it. Players want this from the teams. In the give and take of a negotiation, this should lead to longer term deals and/or lower caphits. Instead, we just seem to give absolutely everything (NMC, deals that take players right to or just past free agency, very high caphits, maximizing early signing bonuses, etc) while providing a unique environment to make an extra several million in endorsements that wouldn't be available in other marks while getting nothing in return.

On top of all of that, it's not even like the tax advantageous teams are the only ones getting better deals. Pastrnak, Gaudreau, Aho, Scheifele, Ehlers, Konecny, Provorov, Larkin, MacKinnon, etc aren't playing in super low tax jurisdictions.
Pre cOVID world
 
Navada-Florida-Texas-Tennessee-Washington are the states without a state income tax yet only 1 team got discounts from there players and this is now being used as them having an unfair advantage compared to the rest of the league .

Tampa did a good job getting some of there players to take less but it had zero to do with not having a income state tax .
You don't see players wanting to sign for less money with the Panthers under the same tax circumstances.
 
We also offer significant advantages that the majority of the league cannot match. However unlike the Lightning/Panthers, we don't seem to benefit from that at all via getting better contracts.

One is endorsements. Tavares made 1.7M in endorsements, Marner 2M in endorsements, and Matthews 2.3M in endorsements, compared to Karlsson, Panarin, Seguin, Price, etc all making $500K or less in endorsements. Only McDavid, Crosby, and Ovechkin make more in endorsements.

Another is the signing bonuses. Marner gets something like ~41M out of 61M paid before the season starts in the 3rd year of his contract (i.e. when he's played ~33% of the contract, he's already been paid ~66% of the contract). This is significant value, because he can invest that earlier and make millions of extra dollars off of it. Players want this from the teams. In the give and take of a negotiation, this should lead to longer term deals and/or lower caphits. Instead, we just seem to give absolutely everything (NMC, deals that take players right to or just past free agency, very high caphits, maximizing early signing bonuses, etc) while providing a unique environment to make an extra several million in endorsements that wouldn't be available in other marks while getting nothing in return.

On top of all of that, it's not even like the tax advantageous teams are the only ones getting better deals. Pastrnak, Gaudreau, Aho, Scheifele, Ehlers, Konecny, Provorov, Larkin, MacKinnon, etc aren't playing in super low tax jurisdictions.
I completely agree that when it comes to endorsements Toronto should be considered #1. I mean would Zach Hyman be on commercials if he played for any other team and I'm including the other six Canadian teams.
 
I will ask Rocks for his kids powerpoint sheet from Tampa but I am told it is very exact down to a dollar an EXACT tax number so he made exactly same $$$ as he would in Detroit ... now Tampa has drafted and developed really really well too (best in league) but they are utilizing Florida tax situation to da nines in negotiations with their guys to take their discounts ... you are kidding yourself if you think guys take less because of team ... it is too hard to make it (virtually impossible) and it costs a MINT today to make it so families in many cases sacrificed way too much and these kids know it ... hockey has always been an expensive sport but it used to be a cops/fireman's kids from Mimico with a stay at home mom could scrape by and still make it ... those days are over .. today it is $100,000+ minimum lottery ticket and that is with a ton of help
I remember reading a report that when Steve Yzerman was the Lightning GM and meet with John Tavares about signing with them, he tried to use their tax advantage as to why he should consider signing for less AAV.
 
Do you get paid on what you have done or will do. Guy prior to his last season of his ELC had never broken 100 points, or 90 or 80, he’ll even 70 yet he deserves to be the second highest paid player in the NHL?

Please feel free to join my HR at my job, looking to get overpaid based on projections alone. Not results.

:thumbu:

I don't understand people's obsession with comparing their jobs to professional athletes. The two are completely separate, and like it or not RFA's get paid for past production as well as potential, it is what it is.

Now to the actual point, Auston Matthews has been a point per game or better player every year since his rookie season. The only reason he hasn't hit 80 and 90 points is because of injury and the pandemic which have limited his games played. Furthermore, those are just point totals which do not encapsulate a players total value. In terms of play driving ability Matthews has been one of the best in the NHL since day 1 and last season took leaps defensively. He may already be a top 5-7 NHL player, and there is little doubt in my mind that he will only improve barring injury given his age.
 
  • Like
Reactions: LeafsNation75
I don't understand people's obsession with comparing their jobs to professional athletes. The two are completely separate, and like it or not RFA's get paid for past production as well as potential, it is what it is.

Now to the actual point, Auston Matthews has been a point per game or better player every year since his rookie season. The only reason he hasn't hit 80 and 90 points is because of injury and the pandemic which have limited his games played. Furthermore, those are just point totals which do not encapsulate a players total value. In terms of play driving ability Matthews has been one of the best in the NHL since day 1 and last season took leaps defensively. He may already be a top 5-7 NHL player, and there is little doubt in my mind that he will only improve barring injury given his age.
Last season Matthews got 80 points along with his 47 goals in 70 games played.
 
I will ask Rocks for his kids powerpoint sheet from Tampa but I am told it is very exact down to a dollar an EXACT tax number so he made exactly same $$$ as he would in Detroit ... now Tampa has drafted and developed really really well too (best in league) but they are utilizing Florida tax situation to da nines in negotiations with their guys to take their discounts ... you are kidding yourself if you think guys take less because of team ... it is too hard to make it (virtually impossible) and it costs a MINT today to make it so families in many cases sacrificed way too much and these kids know it ... hockey has always been an expensive sport but it used to be a cops/fireman's kids from Mimico with a stay at home mom could scrape by and still make it ... those days are over .. today it is $100,000+ minimum lottery ticket and that is with a ton of help
how come da other non state tax teams like da Panthers/Knights/Preds not getting these discounts ?
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad