Stephen
Moderator
- Feb 28, 2002
- 83,109
- 62,030
Speaking of "killer instinct" the one thing that bothered me most about Matthews was also related to his increase physical play at the same time.
He would throw a hit and take the body and a scrum would occur and then he would stand there grinning like a Cheshire cat, as the opposition grabbed him by the collar and shook him like a rag doll and he just took it laughing.
Killer instinct to me means hating to lose and doing whatever it takes to win, and that means being serious. The follow-through of his intense hit looked like more like a carefree lack of compete low intensity response, and follows through to it doesn't matter if the team wins or loses.
Matthews as the Rocket Richard winner is certainly due full credit for his Hart nomination as valuable to his team, however I still see a lot of growth potential where he carries that forward particularly during the playoffs to the point he is getting Conn Symthe consideration and MVP. He got the size and the strength to dominate a game, but not the maturity level has not caught up to his skillset and talent yet. IMO
Dougie Gilmour is what I think of when I hear "killer instinct" and I suppose that is why they nicknamed him killer.. He was small but he played like a pit bull on the ice and this is what I'd like to see from Matthews in time when his true killer instinct kicks in.
I think he baited Chiarot into taking a penalty on that play, and then dialed up the intensity in Game 2-4 following up. So that Cheshire cat grin isn’t necessarily the whole picture.
But to your very valid point, if he’s going to be a gamer you throw that heavy hit, draw the retaliation and laugh your ass off when your team is up 5-1 in a close out game, a little insult to injury. Not when you haven’t done the job and no one is worried about your PP.
To get back to Killer. You want to see them want to dominate.