theTTC
Registered User
- Aug 17, 2010
- 2,839
- 2,471
Bell not yet... another month I think.Bell is out now, Rogers owns the majority. Tanenbaum is rumored to be bought out soon too.
Bell not yet... another month I think.Bell is out now, Rogers owns the majority. Tanenbaum is rumored to be bought out soon too.
That’s pretty much the definition of Beta chokers instead of Alpha winnersThe bigger problem is that JT, Matthews and Marner ALL shrink in big games. “If we had great depth, they could carry our invisible stars in games 5-7” is missing the bigger issue, which is the stars turning invisible in games 5-7.
Watching the careers of guys like McDavid, Crosby, Geno, Ovie, Draisaitl, MacKinnon, Kucherov, Pasta, Marchand, Rantanen, Patty Kane, Perry, Getzlaf, Makar, etc., these guys so often take over games when it matters, and legitimately dominate. Matthews and Marner are consistently completely useless in the crucial games, JT mostly useless, Nylander has some moments but not enough to compensate. That’s why we lose - we’re built around guys who so consistently give you nothing when it matters most.
Even guys like Suzuki and Caufield do reasonably well in their limited playoffs on teams that barely make the playoffs. And their playoff years are when they are still young as opposed to being vets.The bigger problem is that JT, Matthews and Marner ALL shrink in big games. “If we had great depth, they could carry our invisible stars in games 5-7” is missing the bigger issue, which is the stars turning invisible in games 5-7.
Watching the careers of guys like McDavid, Crosby, Geno, Ovie, Draisaitl, MacKinnon, Kucherov, Pasta, Marchand, Rantanen, Patty Kane, Perry, Getzlaf, Makar, etc., these guys so often take over games when it matters, and legitimately dominate. Matthews and Marner are consistently completely useless in the crucial games, JT mostly useless, Nylander has some moments but not enough to compensate. That’s why we lose - we’re built around guys who so consistently give you nothing when it matters most.
He is actually injuredTime for this bum to visit the surgeon or a witch doctor, whoever the f*** to fix himself.
I would say a 1 income $50-60k per family living in Clarington then Markham is POOR but you can define however you'd likeDoubt either of their families were "poor", more likely middle-class. There are no poor kids in hockey in the GTA.
I wish Mackinnon would have taken over yesterday's game when it mattered
SameI wish Matthews would have taken over any big game he has ever played in his entire life. And no, the All Star game doesn't count.
I would say a 1 income $50-60k per family living in Clarington then Markham is POOR but you can define however you'd like
So what .. they never paid 1 nickel it was all on scholarship my friend .. in fact Paul do some research first and you will find out he was da teams trainer for 1 year and earned a decent fee on top of that .. Paul did that many times with Kings and Flyers as well .. da reason he went to Kings originally was it was only team that would take him a year up on sponsorshipView attachment 1041024
Considering Marner attended The Hill Academy - an exclusive private school with a focus on athletics that costs upwards of $50,000 or more to attend every year - I think it's safe to say the Marner's weren't struggling to put food on the table while Mitch was growing up.
Those were some good teams. Lots of great players but you could see how special Marner was even then.So what .. they never paid 1 nickel it was all on scholarship my friend .. in fact Paul do some research first and you will find out he was da teams trainer for 1 year and earned a decent fee on top of that .. Paul did that many times with Kings and Flyers as well .. da reason he went to Kings originally was it was only team that would take him a year up on sponsorship
Folks never liked Paul, even most on his teams quite frankly, but I always found Mitch to be a good spirits and happy on da bench .. he had some issues in his stride which i hoped he'd correct which i still believe would have helped him as he grew but again Paul made da call on where Mitch went for skating advice .. and look bottom line his kid made a boatload of $$$ in hockey and very very very few do .. i wish him nothing but da best .. i was one of very very very few who supported Mitch on NT54 where you may know he was hated as a kid .. lots of jealous folks who only a tiny fraction of Mitch's talent .. when games got down to only da best of da best kids he always struggled to win although he gave it his allThose were some good teams. Lots of great players but you could see how special Marner was even then.
Can't wait to see this guy without Mitch glued to his hip. All the cute shit doesn't work in the playoffs. Auston plays way more direct when he's away from Mitch
I would say a 1 income $50-60k per family living in Clarington then Markham is POOR but you can define however you'd like
Bottom line you are right .. i was just correcting folks who think he had an easy privileged upbringingSometimes, (and by that I mean all the time) I find it disconcertingly annoying that we know so much about Marner and all the hard knocks he ever took in his life.
The whole tension is he got paid a lot of money and the championship output was not worth the price paid. That’s it.
Do we really need every biographical detail to justify why he asked for what he did? Does the public know or care this much about any other player in the game. There’s more baggage here than the arrivals terminal at Pearson.
So what .. they never paid 1 nickel it was all on scholarship my friend .. in fact Paul do some research first and you will find out he was da teams trainer for 1 year and earned a decent fee on top of that .. Paul did that many times with Kings and Flyers as well .. da reason he went to Kings originally was it was only team that would take him a year up on sponsorship