AUDIO - Cam Neely looses it on 98.5 as Felger and Mazz pound him with questions | Page 17 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League

AUDIO - Cam Neely looses it on 98.5 as Felger and Mazz pound him with questions

lol ya ok im done here . Id expect this from certain people on here and it wouldn't faze me but coming from you is a different story.

As far as your comment goes I really haven't followed enough of Brads posts if he is brainofj to form much of an opinion hockey wise. It is truly obvious he is very intelligent from his posts today I really just have some different opinions .

Mike I also believe is very intelligent but a lot of his hockey posts are really off the wall, ninety nine percent negative and are usually over the top.

bp13 I have always really respected his hockey opinions . With out a doubt a guy who has opinions both positive and negative and not automatically formed in a certain direction.

You I have a lot of respect for . I have loved some of your articles and really believe a lot more of your inside stuff than most. I wouldn't even have minded arguing my points against you but when a lot of people on here feel the need to just stick together with a post like this ill move on.

What I like most about this thread are all the nice things being said about me.

Thanks everyone.

I find myself regularly agreeing with Mike. Of course, he makes the arguments far funnier and wittier than I do, but I think his angle is often solid.

I also find myself regularly agreeing with bp13.

But I suppose that means I'm unhinged. That's fine.
 
I find myself regularly agreeing with Mike. Of course, he makes the arguments far funnier and wittier than I do, but I think his angle is often solid.

I also find myself regularly agreeing with bp13.

But I suppose that means I'm unhinged. That's fine.

I seem to find myself on the opposite side of Mike pretty regularly, but I don't question his intelligence in the slightest.

Stability is another matter entirely...


:laugh:
 
I seem to find myself on the opposite side of Mike pretty regularly, but I don't question his intelligence in the slightest.

Stability is another matter entirely...


:laugh:

There is no weaker of a position than a poster questioning someones intelligence when they disagree with them. They might as well respond with "Oh yeah!?!?"
 
I was in favor of the B's trading at the deadline the last two seasons because I didn't think they were a legit Cup team, but I can understand the other side of the argument.

I really don't see the relevance of the Amazon story? I don't have your business chops, but it seems to me that the Amazon business model doesn't really apply to sport's franchises, particularly when it comes to the uncertainty of futures/prospects and the pressure on FO's to win quickly. Bezos has a solid platform in Amazon (oh and he's also the CEO and founder) so he can afford to look years into the future. Don't think there are any GM's in sports that have the type of job security to allow that sort of thinking (Belichick probably closest thing to it).

It's not about directly comparing Amazon to sports. It's about the discipline and culture of an organization in having a vision, sticking to that plan, and not making reactionary moves based on today's news and/or position in the standings.
 
It's not about directly comparing Amazon to sports. It's about the discipline and culture of an organization in having a vision, sticking to that plan, and not making reactionary moves based on today's news and/or position in the standings.

I got the analogy. I just didn't think it was a good one because of the differences in the two types of businesses. Having a plan and sticking to a vision are essential. So is flexibility and adapting to changing conditions/situations.
 
Last edited:
There is no weaker of a position than a poster questioning someones intelligence when they disagree with them. They might as well respond with "Oh yeah!?!?"

Kwwhf.png


Oh Yeah!!
 
I got the analogy. I just didn't think it was a good one because of the differences in the two types of businesses. Having a plan and sticking to a vision are essential. So is flexibility and adapting to changing conditions/situations.

That means you didn't get the analogy. You're taking it too literally if you're worried about who exactly said it and what business they are in. Next time I'll leave the exact details vague to avoid that confusion.

Sports managers can learn a ton from the Bezos, Musks, Buffetts, Mungers, etc. of the world. Many probably do.

For example an example on the opposite end of things...Jack Dorsey provides each employee at Twitter and Square the book "The score takes care of itself" by football legend Bill Walsh. If you haven't read it, I would suggest it. Awesome book. I'm sure some of the employees have the same reaction as you, "what the hell does football have to do with cash registers or tweets?" But Jack doesn't do this because he wants them to learn the history of the west coast offense.

I agree flexibility is needed and ALWAYS should be accounted for...good visions always account for flexibility. If the Bruins are penning Carlo or JFK as top like players and building it like that..they're only fooling themselves. There will always be flexibility in any realistic plan because of so many variable factors and that's in both sports and business. I'm not talking about flexibility, I'm talking about short term reactionary moves. That's why I don't want to blow up the team or coaching staff or anything else this summer but keep building on what Sweeney started at this time last year with a target date in mind.

But like I said, if Loui, Stempniak, and/or Liles are on the next cup contending team...I'll gladly come back and take my licks for this thread..as clearly they were part of a larger plan that I can't see at the current time, but I would be highly surprised if they're part of the franchise come July 1.
 
That means you didn't get the analogy. You're taking it too literally if you're worried about who exactly said it and what business they are in. Next time I'll leave the exact details vague to avoid that confusion.

Sports managers can learn a ton from the Bezos, Musks, Buffetts, Mungers, etc. of the world. Many probably do.

For example an example on the opposite end of things...Jack Dorsey provides each employee at Twitter and Square the book "The score takes care of itself" by football legend Bill Walsh. If you haven't read it, I would suggest it. Awesome book. I'm sure some of the employees have the same reaction as you, "what the hell does football have to do with cash registers or tweets?" But Jack doesn't do this because he wants them to learn the history of the west coast offense.

I agree flexibility is needed and ALWAYS should be accounted for...good visions always account for flexibility. If the Bruins are penning Carlo or JFK as top like players and building it like that..they're only fooling themselves. There will always be flexibility in any realistic plan because of so many variable factors and that's in both sports and business. I'm not talking about flexibility, I'm talking about short term reactionary moves. That's why I don't want to blow up the team or coaching staff or anything else this summer but keep building on what Sweeney started at this time last year with a target date in mind.

But like I said, if Loui, Stempniak, and/or Liles are on the next cup contending team...I'll gladly come back and take my licks for this thread..as clearly they were part of a larger plan that I can't see at the current time, but I would be highly surprised if they're part of the franchise come July 1.

Oh Yeah!?!? Well...did you ever play? Lol

Seriously, I totally get the analogy about long term thinking. I'm just not sure it can be carried out in the sports arena. Why don't we just leave it at that? Working from home and just watched Flames press conference. Analysts talked about how two years ago and the playoffs kind of derailed the "rebuild" thinking for a period of time. I think the same happened this year. If you gave Seeeney sodium pen I bet he would say he thought the B's would be a .500 non-playoff team this year. I think it would have been better if that had happened.
 
^ agreed, and if the B's are in the same situation this year..I hope it's handled better than the last two years have been
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad