seventieslord
Student Of The Game
is Evil Sather around at all?
I have the pick after him, and I'd consider trading down...but still undecided.
I PMd him after I picked Geoffrion, so it has been a while. My guess is he's not around.
is Evil Sather around at all?
I have the pick after him, and I'd consider trading down...but still undecided.
Wow! He went 77 in ATD #8. There are 7 centers I would have taken first.![]()
Wow! He went 77 in ATD #8. There are 7 centers I would have taken first.![]()
And that was a damn good pick !
Keep in mind the team you were facing. It would have taken a lot more than a Perreault over some other guy pick for you to beat that powerful first round opponent.I must agree.
At the time I used his pick as evidence that my own 3rd rounder was a steal. Based on previous draft history, he was, (latest he was ever picked) but not based on comparison to Perreault, who went 20-30 spots late. I wish I took Perreault; things could have been a lot different.
Keep in mind the team you were facing. It would have taken a lot more than a Perreault over some other guy pick for you to beat that powerful first round opponent.
Oh, I know that, believe me. I'm kinda wishfully thinking that I may have gone in a better direction had I started with Perreault, and therefore would have placed higher and not faced you and raleh. Revisionist history at best...
As for Earl Seibert, I could not possibly be happier with this pick. He's a guy I've wanted since I started in the ATD.
I was pretty sure you'd go with Seibert there, though I thought MacInnis was also a possibility, speaking of point shots...
MacInnis was plan B and Horton plan C. Plan D was to trade down because we could not meet our needs without one of those 3.
Apologies for the delays, I work late and was unable to handle the trade offers until after everyone else had gone to bed.
As for Earl Seibert, I could not possibly be happier with this pick. He's a guy I've wanted since I started in the ATD. I'm a huge fan of rugged defensive d-men with mobility and Earl is truly elite in that company. And I'm glad to contribute to his rising draft profile. I personally see him as a bigger Chris Chelios. And I always like getting a right handed point shot early.
I'm so pleased with the pick that I'm naming him 1st alternate captain.
![]()
+1. However, they are both good choices at the place they have been selected. To be honest, I'll tell who are the steal and the bad pick when all the selection will be made.
I have him a definite stage below Chelios. Chelios was a first team allstar 5 times in an incredibly deep era. Seibert made it in 1935, and then was a second-team guy every season until the war years. 10 straight selections is a hell of an accomplishment and he certainly deserves to be picked where he was, but I have him the next tier below guys like Chelios, Fetisov, and Lidstrom.
Not to be a downer, I just have a big man-crush on Chris Chelios :thumbu.:
We know each other too well, though I honestly wasn't sure who you were trading up for when you took Beliveau, perhaps because we never really discussed picks in that range. Did you have a good read on who I'd take with those first two picks?
Man, 10 defensemen taken in the first half of the 2nd round. Well...fair enough, locking in a #1 defenseman is very important, and there's a pretty meaningful dropoff from the last guy in that 2nd round tier (actually, I think there are a couple of tiers here) and the next best defenseman.
I have him a definite stage below Chelios. Chelios was a first team allstar 5 times in an incredibly deep era. Seibert made it in 1935, and then was a second-team guy every season until the war years. 10 straight selections is a hell of an accomplishment and he certainly deserves to be picked where he was, but I have him the next tier below guys like Chelios, Fetisov, and Lidstrom.
Not to be a downer, I just have a big man-crush on Chris Chelios :thumbu.:
Yeah, we had to sacrifice size up front last time, which is my biggest regret about our team and a mistake I wouldn't make again when the chance to trade up emerged.
As for you, I was really curious to see if you'd trade down. When you took Dryden, I was not surprised at all. I remember that being a possible plan if we picked lower. In the second round I had no idea what you'd do, but I really like the Park pick.
I don't have any regrets about the Seals. There were a lot of GMs (including perhaps the two finalists) who thought we iced the best team last time around. I look back at the picks we made and can't find much we could have done better.
We could always pm the next few drafters to give them a heads up.I'm for it as well, but folks are going to say it's unfair to change the rules in the middle of the game.