Prospect Info: At 8th Overall the Kings Select Brandt Clarke

KopitarGOAT420

Registered User
Jan 30, 2020
573
854
USA
Clarke & Edmundson look pretty damn good together. Allowing Clarke to do his thing, Edmundson playing solid relatively speaking.
Definitely agree.

The contract still isn't great but Edmundson has been better than expected IMO. Sure there's a couple annoying/unnecessary penalties and a few missed defensive assignments at times but you're right - He and Clarke have actually looked like a damn solid pair most of the time.

If Clarke keeps playing like this, the Kings' blue line all of the sudden goes from 'mid' to 'pretty damn good' when Doughty gets back.

Anderson - Doughty
Gavrikov - Clarke
Edmundson - Spence

That actually looks like a pretty nice D core with the emergence of Clarke as a young star. Hopefully when Doughty is back they leave Clarke on PP1 and have Doughty focus more on PK / 5 on 5. Worst case scenario Doughty will run PP1 and Clarke will run PP2 - Not super ideal but I'd still have faith in Clarke putting up points with PP2 time and strong play 5 on 5.

This kid is the real deal and exactly what LA's defense has needed. I'm telling you guys when Doughty is back the Kings will be seriously cooking.
 

Chazz Reinhold

Registered User
Sep 6, 2005
9,212
3,134
The Stanley Cup
According to this board Edmundson sucks tho
He does. Clarke is objectively much better away from Edmundson.


Digging deeper, Clarke has the second most defensive zone giveaways on the team with 8 (Spence, 9). At 5-on-5, Clarke has the highest xGA (expected goals against) on the team with 8.42 and the highest HDCA (high danger chances against) with 34. He and his defensive partner, Joel Edmundson, have surrendered 6 HDGA (high danger goals against), both second to Quinton Byfield (8).

All those stats certainly have room for improvement, but it would be unfair to not consider that Edmundson, his usual partner at 5-on-5, has struggled in the LA zone. In the 55:52 TOI where Clarke has been away from Edmundson he has put up the following metrics at even strength:

  • 70.29 CF% (shot attempts)
  • 69.74 SF% (shots on goal)
  • 80.00 GF% (goals)
  • 65.08 SCF% (scoring chances)
  • 60.00% HDCF% (high danger chances)
Simply put, Clarke has been extremely good at both ends of the ice when he’s not paired with Edmundson.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,228
65,927
I.E.
I mean i thought it was pretty well established that

Spence:Englund::Clarke:Edmundson

I like Edmundson as a human being but I can't take anyone that defends him as a player at this stage seriously. He f***ing sucks. Full stop. Maybe he can improve--it's a new team, new city, new system and more, but just like the "Spence/Englund pairing" was one of the best 3rd pairings in the NHL because Spence is a good #3 and Englund is a #9, "Clarke/Edmundson pairing" is good because Clarke is a #2-#3 and Edmundson is a #8.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Chazz Reinhold

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad