Prospect Info: At 8th Overall the Kings Select Brandt Clarke

johnjm22

Pseudo Intellectual
Aug 2, 2005
20,884
17,681
I see both sides of the debate on how much Kopitar should have accepted. I feel like he has no obligation to do it, but some athletes have in the past (Bergeron, Tom Brady) but others certainly have not. Remember he did have Ryan Smyth as a linemate for 2 years, Smyth was very vocal about how he learned to get everything you can from Weight and Guerin, maybe that was passed on to AK and DD. The $7m number wasn't ever going to hurt the Kings, the big risk was in the two years for a guy who will be 37 and 38, but at this point it's looking more and more like Kopitar is going to be more Bergeron and Pavelski than he is going to be Getzlaf. With his game-sense it really is possible that Kopitar could play into his 40's if he wanted to, he is still one step ahead of almost everyone in both zones even as his skating has gotten worse.
I wouldn't say Bergeron took anymore of a discount than Kopitar did.

Bergeron got 5M coming off a 65pts season with the cap at 82.5M

Kopitar is getting 7M coming off a 74pts season (and likely 80pts season) with the cap at 87.5M and ∼92M.

Bruins were just able to amortize Bergeron's cap hit which is one of the things that's hurting them this year.
 

Ghetty Green

Registered User
Apr 7, 2018
1,478
1,689
Agree on Danaults ability, it’s purely a cap conundrum.

I like him but they have ‘potentially’ Byfield or Turcotte to fit into that slot through the middle. Also with the cap going up some teams out East would probably be very interested in him. Of the players with meaningful cap hits up front his is probably the most moveable and/or the one that you’re most likely to want to move. They won’t be trading Kopitar, Dubois, Fiala, Kempe or Moore for various reasons. I’m not saying I want to move him but if we hit a scenario where they need to move a meaningful contract I think he’s the best candidate.

As you say we will need guys on friendly deals because it’s looking like some of the ELC guys are going to push for big increases. Let’s hope so because if they do it’ll have been a great season.
I see your point, but I put a LOT of stock into PD24s leadership skills. After every game, he's the guy high fiving every guy as they come off the ice. I think it's fair to assume that he is a vocal leader as well. In fact, I think he's probably more vocal than Kopi. His teammates seem to love him. Unless he falls off a cliff I'd rather keep. He's a culture changer. And his game is ready made for bottom 6 minutes for when (hopefully) Turcotte and QB surpass him on the depth chart.
 

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,706
9,935
twitter.com

Hadn't even thought of comparing him to Bouchard, it's an interesting thought

Clarke doesn't have anywhere near the shot though
With all the shot blocking the bomb from the point isnt super important in my opinion (assuming thats what youre referring to). Clarke gets his shots on goal more often than not.. by keeping his head up and moving around to find a lane - I think thats more valuable... of course having the bomb in your arsenal is a plus.. but I dont think it hurts him that much. Clarke did put up 23g in 31 games in juniors.. 10g in 50 games last season. So his goal scoring ability seems solid.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,219
65,905
I.E.
With all the shot blocking the bomb from the point isnt super important in my opinion (assuming thats what youre referring to). Clarke gets his shots on goal more often than not.. by keeping his head up and moving around to find a lane - I think thats more valuable... of course having the bomb in your arsenal is a plus.. but I dont think it hurts him that much. Clarke did put up 23g in 31 games in juniors.. 10g in 50 games last season. So his goal scoring ability seems solid.

Oh i agree. His shot is stealthy and effective. Just referencing the direct comp to Bouchard whose slapper/onetimer is a weapon Brandt does't have.
 

Surf Nutz

Hockey Remote Viewer With A Frozen Finger
May 16, 2022
2,806
979
In the tube
clubnami.com

Hadn't even thought of comparing him to Bouchard, it's an interesting thought

Clarke doesn't have anywhere near the shot though

And Bouchard can't pass with the anticipation, accuracy and timing or look off players and pivot like Clarke.

Clarke is truly different defenseman his play is truly evolutionary.

Someone called him an offensive savant about a year ago...

He could be a piece of cup returning team.

Byfield needs to return to form at C.

The coaches should be showing him video of his good runs of play.
 

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,219
65,905
I.E.

Hiller, Kings cautious with Clarke despite impressive start​


cc @Raccoon Jesus see comment re Edmundson impact on Clarke

no real surprise, it's the same as Spence and Englund last year

the theory is fine and I think most would agree--get guys like them a safety blanket. Even karlsson had Methot. But it's like they're sto stuck to the theory that they'll throw any old shit together to make it work and Edmundson, Burroughs, and Englund as these guys' partners are arguably the worst players in the NHL and they dont' seem to be able to put together that those three are the issues, not Spence and Clarke.
 

AbsentMojo

F-ing get up and hunt! Cmon Todd!
Apr 18, 2018
9,706
9,935
twitter.com
no real surprise, it's the same as Spence and Englund last year

the theory is fine and I think most would agree--get guys like them a safety blanket. Even karlsson had Methot. But it's like they're sto stuck to the theory that they'll throw any old shit together to make it work and Edmundson, Burroughs, and Englund as these guys' partners are arguably the worst players in the NHL and they dont' seem to be able to put together that those three are the issues, not Spence and Clarke.
Exactly. LAK pro-scouting and team player evaluation is highly suspect.
 

SmytheKing

Registered User
Apr 7, 2007
971
1,407
no real surprise, it's the same as Spence and Englund last year

the theory is fine and I think most would agree--get guys like them a safety blanket. Even karlsson had Methot. But it's like they're sto stuck to the theory that they'll throw any old shit together to make it work and Edmundson, Burroughs, and Englund as these guys' partners are arguably the worst players in the NHL and they dont' seem to be able to put together that those three are the issues, not Spence and Clarke.
Going from guys like Mitchell and Scuderi to these guys for the same purpose/role really shows you how bad Blake is compared to Lombardi.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chris kontos

Statto

HFBoards Sponsor
Sponsor
May 9, 2014
5,669
8,014
Going from guys like Mitchell and Scuderi to these guys for the same purpose/role really shows you how bad Blake is compared to Lombardi.
I’m no fan of the Edmundson deal (both term and AAV) but which Mitchell/Scuderi equivalents were available (although both were very different players).
 

Sol

Smile
Jun 30, 2017
24,351
20,454
God that Edmundson signing is so annoying

Blake finally got HIS guy, just in time for him to be a decrepit pylon and drag down Clarke

Four year deal. Close to 4m AAV. Blake masterclass
Isn’t it funny that it’s not remotely close to his worst contract. PLD 8 years at 8 million. And Petersen 15 million for 3 years when he only played a few games.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: VILARGOD

chris kontos

Registered User
Feb 28, 2023
3,956
2,545
On SN last nite during the calgary-edmonton game they had a table that displayed the most time on ice increases since last yr for d men . Englund was tied for second in the nhl with an average of a 4min 10sec increas
Post is my contribution to out of context useless beancounting
 
Last edited:

Raccoon Jesus

We were right there
Oct 30, 2008
63,219
65,905
I.E.
I’m no fan of the Edmundson deal (both term and AAV) but which Mitchell/Scuderi equivalents were available (although both were very different players).

Please don't 'what was blake supposed to do?' this

this is the result of YEARS of mismanagement, not one offseason of bad signings, bottom line is he didn't have the foresight to capture long-term partners for either guy, and literal YEARS of completely imbalanced RHD-LHD lineups that culminated in now having NO depth at EITHER position rather than exchanging a dearth of RHD for any LHD at all
 

SmytheKing

Registered User
Apr 7, 2007
971
1,407
I’m no fan of the Edmundson deal (both term and AAV) but which Mitchell/Scuderi equivalents were available (although both were very different players).
Tyson Barrie and Sami Vatanen were available over the past couple of years and both would have been better suited to help with guys like Clarke and Spence and even Durzi. Several others too.

Something to remember before poo-pooing any possible players is that Mitchell and Scuderi were both pretty much castoffs at the time of their signing. Edmundson was a bad signing and we all knew it from the jump.
 
  • Like
Reactions: VILARGOD

Ad

Ad

Ad