I think we have a different understanding of a ton of opportunities then. Tottenham had two decent chances before the 2-0, one free kick and the chance by Lucas after the shot from Son from distance. Liverpool didn't play great, but they played with an early lead, so they didn't have to create much. You can't say Tottenham did much more than them to deserve to win.
Yeah, I honestly hesitated writing that post because I was having a hard time describing what I meant. I think Spurs pretty much owned the ball and created a bunch of situations that should have been great opportunities that were fumbled away before they could fully materialize.
In other words, had Spurs potted a couple of goals, I don’t think anyone watching would claim that they came against the run of play overall.
This is a small consolation, sure, but to me Spurs played the better of two pretty poor showings.