CBJWerenski8
Formerly CBJWennberg10 (RIP Kivi)
- Jun 13, 2009
- 42,418
- 24,356
And he'll be playing with garabage here?
No. But not Patrick Kane, Toews, Hossa, Keith, etc.
Yes, I know the same things were said about Saad.
And he'll be playing with garabage here?
Jackets have been solid 5v 5 for pst couple years . To me , Saad never took the next step , and was invisible quite a bit . Finally we have a game breaking talent . Someone that can create offense and can bury his shot
Jackets have been solid 5v 5 for pst couple years . To me , Saad never took the next step , and was invisible quite a bit . Finally we have a game breaking talent . Someone that can create offense and can bury his shot
27 too, he wore it in WCOH.My next big question.... what # will Panarin wear?
72 seems to already be taken
Will Panarin be a RFA or UFA in 2 years?
UFA according to CapfriendlyWill Panarin be a RFA or UFA in 2 years?
27 too, he wore it in WCOH.
UFA according to Capfriendly
who pays Panarin's bonuses from last year....and if it's us does it count towards the cap
Strongly agree with this, and I'm surprised this is coming from a guy named General Saad.
Name changed. Please note I'm now "The Bread Man "
I really like Brandon Saad and bought in full when Jarmo acquired him. But I share the same sense on the bolded, even thought I didn't necessarily want it to be so.
Cost certainty is precisely why they traded Hammer for Murphy and Panarin for Saad.Why did Chicago make this trade? 2 extra years of cost certainty? Forsberg to be their backup? Panarin didn't fit?
That first one, apparently:Why did Chicago make this trade? 2 extra years of cost certainty? Forsberg to be their backup? Panarin didn't fit?
Lateral move at worst, I think. Dayum.
People think we won this trade.... how?
We got a inferior two way player and we probably will only have him for two years. Also he is older and stats could have been inflated playing with Kane.