That's the worst nightmare for a team, having a core good enough to do well in the regular season but go completely invisible when it matters.
There needs to be an addendum to that rule that limits the reviews to like a minimum distance of 3 inches from the line for reviews. Otherwise it just kills momentum and turns a live sport into a stupid static game of millimeters.
I prefer a time limit. If you can't determine conclusively that the call should be overturned in 30 seconds (maybe 60 seconds, but no longer than that), the call stands. Combined with the delay of game penalty, that will force coaches to only challenge calls that are obvious.
I yearn for the day when the Ducks employ a coach who does not coach dump and chase but instead wants possession and zone breakouts and zone entries with speed. I'm not convinced dump and chase will ever work.
For the goal lines yes. The tracking technology would be more difficult with the blue line because you have to track the players as well. But I guess soccer does it with their offsides. I still hate a goal being overturned because a guy is a few millimeters offsides and ultimately didn't even have an impact on the goal.
Really? Hellebuyck, when on his game, is good enough to steal a few, and Georgiev is not good. And Winnipeg has enough depth that they could score some goals. But Hellebuyck has not been good, and outside of game 1, Georgiev has been good enough.
