Yes, because my whole thing is that while it certainly is a factor, the Rangers have other advantages that other teams don't have. Fox, Kane, and Miller are just recent examples of players forcing their way here. It's objectively an attractive destination even with the tax rate. You could make the argument it's still the most attractive destination in the league! (Also, if they ponied up Lafreniere and/or Kakko, Tkachuk would be here instead of in Florida not paying taxes).
Should the league legislate it? Maybe, but I don't think they can. Every city has different taxes. What actually would be the solution?
Beyond that specific issue, there's way more than taxes that makes a free agency/trade destination, and again, there's nothing the league can do to make places equal. You have teams in 32 different cities, and people would rather live in some cities than others for a whole host of reasons.
When you put every possible reason into a blender, New York is still probably at the very top of the list. We're not in any position to say the league structure is unfair to us.
I could see a team like Winnipeg saying "how are we ever supposed to keep or attract players?" but again, what is the league supposed to about it?