Around the NHL - Part XLIII

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
“ Dr. Harjas Grewal explained on X that goaltender injuries are hard to predict…”

And then proceeded to speculate wildly despite the fact that Allen and Keefe both said Markstrom was in good spirits, doing a bit better, he was able to eventually skate himself off of the ice after struggling initially and all Keefe said was “he’s gonna miss some time” which could literally be, he tweaked something and it’s swollen and tender so we’re gonna give him a week or two off so as not to rush things.

I’m glad that “Dr. Injury Expert” speculating on X (of all places) is what our news stories are based on in these advanced modern times.

(Not criticizing you for posting it, just saying…)

MCL sprain. Out 4 to 6 weeks. Honestly, it could've been worse.
 
Donald back in office, expect a big finish for tony D the rest of the year. Good bet for Lou.
 
I know our board has calmed down with Kakko but since it was a thing on the main boards here's Andrew Copp since 2021-22. Take a look at his production with us and everyone else. He even had 14 points in 20 playoff games.

1737756049942.png
 
I know our board has calmed down with Kakko but since it was a thing on the main boards here's Andrew Copp since 2021-22. Take a look at his production with us and everyone else. He even had 14 points in 20 playoff games.

View attachment 966549
Copp was very good here before he got hurt. Even though the numbers still looked good in the playoffs, he wasn't as effective after the injury.

Giving him a long term deal would've been a mistake, however. We did the right thing pivoting to Trocheck.
 
Copp was very good here before he got hurt. Even though the numbers still looked good in the playoffs, he wasn't as effective after the injury.

Giving him a long term deal would've been a mistake, however. We did the right thing pivoting to Trocheck.

But he's never been that close to a PPG guy on the Jets or elsewhere. It was a rare instance of a guy playing at his best with the Rangers in a small sample size. Kakko will fall back down to earth and be a middle 6 guy. Nothing to be ashamed of but not someone to cry over either.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheWrongWay
But he's never been that close to a PPG guy on the Jets or elsewhere. It was a rare instance of a guy playing at his best with the Rangers in a small sample size. Kakko will fall back down to earth and be a middle 6 guy. Nothing to be ashamed of but not someone to cry over either.
Copp & Panarin had instant chemistry. Who knows if that was sustainable long term, but sometimes certain players just mesh well together.

I think Kakko is who he is, which is still a useful player, but if he somehow manages to put up 60 points next season, it's fair to ask what we could've done better to put him in a position to succeed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: SnowblindNYR
Copp & Panarin had instant chemistry. Who knows if that was sustainable long term, but sometimes certain players just mesh well together.

I think Kakko is who he is, which is still a useful player, but if he somehow manages to put up 60 points next season, it's fair to ask what we could've done better to put him in a position to succeed.

But 60 points in the current NHL is good but not this disaster territory that everyone is making it out to be. I don't know people are overreacting because they have a bone to pick with him. There's more anger about this than the JT Miller trade where he was a legit borderline superstar.
 
But 60 points in the current NHL is good but not this disaster territory that everyone is making it out to be. I don't know people are overreacting because they have a bone to pick with him. There's more anger about this than the JT Miller trade where he was a legit borderline superstar.
The problem you continue to have, is that you simply continue to argue about the player itself, while the vast majority are talking about the trade.
 
The problem you continue to have, is that you simply continue to argue about the player itself, while the vast majority are talking about the trade.

But the trade was fine. 2nd pairing defenseman + 2 picks one of which is a 3rd is plenty for a middle 6 winger. People just want to be upset.
 
But the trade was fine. 2nd pairing defenseman + 2 picks one of which is a 3rd is plenty for a middle 6 winger. People just want to be upset.
Again, you are talking about the player as you perceive him. Not what his value could've been, had this trade been executed properly.

Good thing Borgen has looked more than fine. But he's not a 2nd pairing defenceman.
 
How do you know what the value was? Were you in the calls with Drury?
No. But we have the insiders reporting that Drury took a very cheap deal from other GM's perspective. And we are talking about what the value was at the time of the trade, not last summer, or in the summer of 2023. Or what it could've been at the deadline.

Whatever makes you happy, the Kakko trade was failed asset management. Just like the Buchnevich trade was at the time. That doesn't mean it was a mistake to move on from those players.
 
It's just a perfect fit. Tony DeAngelo is what happens to your brain when you mix Zyn and talk radio while spending half of your life in traffic on the Jericho Turnpike.

Once Tony flames out again, he can finally go to his true calling, owning a pool supplies store in Massapequa.
no need to slander jericho. home of A. Fox after all
 
No. But we have the insiders reporting that Drury took a very cheap deal from other GM's perspective. And we are talking about what the value was at the time of the trade, not last summer, or in the summer of 2023. Or what it could've been at the deadline.

Whatever makes you happy, the Kakko trade was failed asset management. Just like the Buchnevich trade was at the time. That doesn't mean it was a mistake to move on from those players.

I'd love to see the source that Drury took a cheap deal. Buch returned a 4th liner, and was a much better player at the time of the trade. Night and day difference. But even there what did Drury leave on the table? You think some super prospect was on the table and he said "nah I'm good"?
 
I'd love to see the source that Drury took a cheap deal. Buch returned a 4th liner, and was a much better player at the time of the trade. Night and day difference. But even there what did Drury leave on the table? You think some super prospect was on the table and he said "nah I'm good"?
We have the word of Dreger who said a few GMs he contacted said that they were surprised how cheap the price for Kakko was, and they would've been on it had they known that was all it would've taken. So yeah, there would've been better offers.

And like I said, the bigger issue was the timing. Drury traded Kakko at his absolute worst value. Not a spectacular season, after getting scratched by the coach, and after basically making a public trade request. You seriously can't believe there wouldn't have been something better on the table during last summer, or even at the deadline had Lavy continued to play Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko.
 
We have the word of Dreger who said a few GMs he contacted said that they were surprised how cheap the price for Kakko was, and they would've been on it had they known that was all it would've taken. So yeah, there would've been better offers.

And like I said, the bigger issue was the timing. Drury traded Kakko at his absolute worst value. Not a spectacular season, after getting scratched by the coach, and after basically making a public trade request. You seriously can't believe there wouldn't have been something better on the table during last summer, or even at the deadline had Lavy continued to play Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko.

I don't really care about hypotheticals. So far it has worked out. You just want something to be angry about.
 
We have the word of Dreger who said a few GMs he contacted said that they were surprised how cheap the price for Kakko was, and they would've been on it had they known that was all it would've taken. So yeah, there would've been better offers.

And like I said, the bigger issue was the timing. Drury traded Kakko at his absolute worst value. Not a spectacular season, after getting scratched by the coach, and after basically making a public trade request. You seriously can't believe there wouldn't have been something better on the table during last summer, or even at the deadline had Lavy continued to play Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko.
I'm curious which GMs had their heads buried so far in the sand that they were unaware Kakko was available. :laugh:

I remember posting something that was written by one of the NHL columnists on The Athletic using past deals to gauge what Kakko might be worth. It was written right before the deal was made. The conclusion the guy reached was he was probably worth a veteran heading to UFA and a couple mid picks, or a second round pick without the veteran player. And then he returned exactly that.

I'm not saying you're wrong, but I'm always amazed when trades are made how many of the anonymous "If I'd have known THAT is what he was worth..." things come out. Hard to fathom how deals are ever made when apparently 90% of GMs don't know players are available.
 
  • Like
Reactions: TheWrongWay
We have the word of Dreger who said a few GMs he contacted said that they were surprised how cheap the price for Kakko was, and they would've been on it had they known that was all it would've taken. So yeah, there would've been better offers.

And like I said, the bigger issue was the timing. Drury traded Kakko at his absolute worst value. Not a spectacular season, after getting scratched by the coach, and after basically making a public trade request. You seriously can't believe there wouldn't have been something better on the table during last summer, or even at the deadline had Lavy continued to play Cuylle-Chytil-Kakko.
Any GM that did not know KK was available in a trade needs to find another job. If they are saying they did not know the price then they should be fired for not inquiring if interested. Do these GMs have access to the internet? I find Dreger's comments amusing at best. I do not find him credible in this regard. Reminds me of the guy who says he would have paid more after a car that he looked at multiple times was sold. I will laugh if Dreger makes the same claim if CK or Mika are traded as well. :D


Updated Trade Landing Spots for Rangers Winger Kaapo ...


Bleacher Report
https://bleacherreport.com › NHL


Dec 17, 2024 — The 23-year-old is probably aiming for a fresh start amid the rumors, which prompted the B/R hockey team to consider a handful of updated landing spots.


Kaapo Kakko Linked To Minnesota Wild In Potential Trade


Yahoo Sports
https://sports.yahoo.com › kaapo-kakko-linked-minnes...

Dec 18, 2024 — Kakko signed a one-year, $2.4 million contract with the Rangers over the summer and is set to become a restricted free agent this upcoming ...


Trade Rumors: Kappo Kakko : r/hawks

Reddit · r/hawks
60+ comments · 1 month ago


Would you trade for Kappo Kakko and what do you think it costs? I figured this would happen to the Rags and Kakko eventually.


Rangers Forward Kaapo Kakko At the Center of Trade Talks


amNewYork
https://www.amny.com › sports › rangers-kaapo-kakko...

Three Potential Trade Destinations For Rangers' Kaapo ...


The Hockey News
https://thehockeynews.com › News


Dec 14, 2024 — Kaapo Kakko is one Rangers forward who could be moved. NHL insider Darren Dreger reported last month that the young winger has been put on the trade block.

Report: Kaapo Kakko trade rumors resurface


Blue Seat Blogs
https://blueseatblogs.com › 2024/11/30 › kaapo-kakko-tr...


Nov 30, 2024 — The Rangers may be dangling Kakko, based on how the offseason went. The Rangers only committed to Kakko for one year in a show-me $2.4 million contract.
 
Last edited:

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad