I think you mean central division. Pacific did crap all.The western conference arms race is better than the cold war in the 80's comrade
I think you mean central division. Pacific did crap all.
If the Avs are smart they'll suck just enough to land in the Pacific wild card.
Probably fed up with Tulsky tanking the franchise entirely within a calendar year.Is there a blizzard in Carolina or something? Where are the fans?
And got dunked on by an awful Bruins squad 4-0 lol.Cooper using Guentzel on the PK
Yep. If only Buffalo could start winning.Potentially good night for Team Tank. Seattle won in regulation. Nashville's winning against Chicago in the 3rd.
And got dunked on by an awful Bruins squad 4-0 lol.
Thats asking for a miracleYep. If only Buffalo could start winning.
Cooper using Guentzel on the PK
But seriously, Tulsky didn't even do what Dallas did in negotiating an extension first and then to make it worse, Rantanen apparently really wanted to go to Edmonton and Tulsky tried to send him to Toronto first for Marner like the bloke didn't even f***ing learn his lesson the first time.
Tulsky is a brilliant capologist. But holy shit is he an absolutely dreadful GM. He pissed away a good part of his prospect pool and a very good Necas and also a depth player in Drury for barely a dozen or so games of Rantanen and losing Guentzel at the end of the season last year, lol.
And then he only gets back Stankoven and some firsts from Dallas. Stank is good, he's very strong on his skates and has a lethal shot but he's also barely 5'8" and he's put up 9 goals in 50+ games this season with a shooting percentage of 6. Played a ton with Robo and Hintz. He'll produce I'm sure in Carolina but that as a return for Rantanen is not ideal.
He didn't learn from the Jake Guentzel trade and then even worse with Rantanen but got back some first rounders and a small but fiesty W/C with a lethal shot that seemingly isn't shooting enough.
And got dunked on by an awful Bruins squad 4-0 lol.
Yep yep yep. The Canes did well from an asset management aspect, but utterly failed at the human aspect. I'd be livid if I was in that room. This should be a prime window year, especially with the East being weak this year. They didn't fully punt the season, but nobody can argue that Stank is better than Necas right now. They are a weaker team this season because of those moves.
Considering their owner's mindset I doubt this will be the last time it happens.
Every owner is going to inherently be a bit of an adversary to the players, but when an owner openly talks about not paying what players are worth you can't be surprised when big ticket players decide to go elsewhere. You're not a genius because you figured out that paying people less will be good for the bottom line. You also can't be surprised when employee loyalty is low...especially among impending UFAs that you acquire via trade that have no real reason to be loyal in the first place.
The bold move would have been asking Rantanen or his camp if he was open to an extension before making the trade in the first place. You think they would have learned after going through it with Jake the year before.Servalli - who, by the way, argued for Stankoven over Necas - mentioned the Canes offered him top dollar. He then suggested Rantanen just wasn't interested in re-signing there.
Carolina's played it safe - almost to a fault - for the sake of having a team that's always right there, but never a clear cut favourite. Yet the one time they make a bold move, it goes sideways.
Rantanens agent used the threat of being interested in signing with the Canes as leverage for more money from the Avs. Backfired on them when the Avs turned around and shipped him there. Agents playing games. Avs were kinda stupid in not waiting for the NHL to release the salary increase projections first though.Servalli - who, by the way, argued for Stankoven over Necas - mentioned the Canes offered him top dollar. He then suggested Rantanen just wasn't interested in re-signing there.
Carolina's played it safe - almost to a fault - for the sake of having a team that's always right there, but never a clear cut favourite. Yet the one time they make a bold move, it goes sideways.
Yep yep yep. The Canes did well from an asset management aspect, but utterly failed at the human aspect. I'd be livid if I was in that room. This should be a prime window year, especially with the East being weak this year. They didn't fully punt the season, but nobody can argue that Stank is better than Necas right now. They are a weaker team this season because of those moves.
Considering their owner's mindset I doubt this will be the last time it happens.
Every owner is going to inherently be a bit of an adversary to the players, but when an owner openly talks about not paying what players are worth you can't be surprised when big ticket players decide to go elsewhere. You're not a genius because you figured out that paying people less will be good for the bottom line. You also can't be surprised when employee loyalty is low...especially among impending UFAs that you acquire via trade that have no real reason to be loyal in the first place.
Thing is it doesn't matter if the agent said that to the Avs. The issue is Tulsky either took their word that it was what he wanted without ever confirming it or they didn't ask at all or cared to and figured they'd get it done.Rantanens agent used the threat of being interested in signing with the Canes as leverage for more money from the Avs. Backfired on them when the Avs turned around and shipped him there. Agents playing games. Avs were kinda stupid in not waiting for the NHL to release the salary increase projections first though.
Did they do well in any aspect?Yep yep yep. The Canes did well from an asset management aspect, but utterly failed at the human aspect. I'd be livid if I was in that room. This should be a prime window year, especially with the East being weak this year. They didn't fully punt the season, but nobody can argue that Stank is better than Necas right now. They are a weaker team this season because of those moves.
Considering their owner's mindset I doubt this will be the last time it happens.
Every owner is going to inherently be a bit of an adversary to the players, but when an owner openly talks about not paying what players are worth you can't be surprised when big ticket players decide to go elsewhere. You're not a genius because you figured out that paying people less will be good for the bottom line. You also can't be surprised when employee loyalty is low...especially among impending UFAs that you acquire via trade that have no real reason to be loyal in the first place.
Brind'Amour said Rantanen told the Hurricanes he was only willing to sign his next contract with four teams. The 28-year-old was scheduled to be an unrestricted free agent before locking in with Dallas.
"There's not been one guy that has left here 'cause they didn't like it here. That was except for Mikko," Brind'Amour said. "And he didn't not like it. When he showed up he said, 'There's four teams I'll go play for, but you're not one of them.' There's 28 other teams he wasn't going to. The better question is, should we have known that before we signed him or attempted to sign him."
The Hurricanes have a history of losing players to free agency. The club acquired star winger Jake Guentzel before last year's deadline but was unable to extend him despite his success in Raleigh.
"Guentzel was the totally opposite thing," Brind'Amour said. "If we offered him the contract we offered him at the end, he's here. But we didn't, for whatever reason. That's a different conversation. And all the other guys that walked out of here at free agency is because they got paid a lot more money than we were offering. They all wanted to stay."