OT: Around the NHL: Final stretch to the playoffs

For the hell of it and since you don't like doing math...

Using Hockey Reference's point shares but calculating at a "per game" basis:

Entire career:

there was a broken table here

[Crosby is better over the course of their entire NHL careers by a little bit]

Ages 20 to 31 (Kuch's entire career):

there was a broken table here

[Crosby is 10% better]

Entire career:

there was a broken table here

[Malkin is 12% worse]

Ages 20 to 31 (Kuch's entire career):

there was a broken table here

[Malkin is slightly better overall, better offensively, but worse defensively]

There's some slight errors in the digits I punched in but I don't think they'd make significant changes. And the "##-age season" from Hockey Reference seems a bit off to me.

Anyway, let's see how Kucherov ages.




edit: oh damnit the table formatting got all messed up... gonna remove

TLDR: Crosby is slightly better overall than Kucherov considering all their NHL seasons (including these twilight years). But comparing the same aged seasons of the two Crosby is 10% better overall. Then for Malkin he is about 12% worse with these twilight years. But for the same ages he is slightly better (better offensively but worse defensively).
I don't think there are many players, if any, worse than Kucherov defensively
 
Kucherov is the GOAT accumulator. And I mean that as no disrespect, you just rarely notice him. Prime Sid and Geno, Ovi pre 2011, Mackinnon, McDavid and Draisaitl all drive play and are a force on the ice. Kuch you don't even realize was playing until you look at the stat sheet and see he had 5 assists.
Read that as goat simulator. Fun game.
 
I don't think there are many players, if any, worse than Kucherov defensively

And yet...

AwO64Sy.png


0.0263 DPS/GP for Kooch and 0.0245 DPS/GP for Geno
 
And yet...

AwO64Sy.png


0.0263 DPS/GP for Kooch and 0.0245 DPS/GP for Geno
Idk much about that stat, but I don't really see it. Malkin was never good defensively (which is annoying because he could have been) but Kucherov seems closer to Patrick Kane/Kyle Connor territory.
 
Resume/career aggregation will go to Kucherov but I still take Malkin over Kucherov as a player.

Don’t really think that’s a hot take either. Kuch more clinical but peak Malkin could control a shift in a way Kucherov couldn’t/doesn’t.

Like put both at same age, at their peak and you get to pick one to start a team…. who tf is picking Kucherov even if he’s going to amass a “better” resume?

I think you'd be surprised.
 
Surprise surprise Seth Jones sucks. Winning in hockey makes GMs way too damn arrogant. They think they can get away with anything. Jack Johnson? Ryan Reaves? Why the F not we can't make mistakes. Take on Seth Jones contract? Well we're smarter than everyone so
 
  • Like
Reactions: BHD
I don't get the hype around Tocchet as a head coach.
I like him as a coach, he’s always changing things and adapting and trying to evolve, but his core roots for anything stays the same - work hard and show up.

He gives a lot of players chances in different situations and will keep trying. He’s the opposite of Sullivan.
 

Users who are viewing this thread

Ad

Ad