tomd
Registered User
- Apr 23, 2003
- 10,433
- 6,453
Fat fingersIs this a phrase anyone uses to describe a 20 goal scorer?
Fat fingersIs this a phrase anyone uses to describe a 20 goal scorer?
Big oof by Ekblad with that 20 game suspension for PEDs.
Fantilli was already a physically mature beast while Carlsson was a tall lanky string bean. We all knew this. Plus yeah Columbus has a much improved roster. I think they have like 5 20 goal scorers or something. Even their enforcer has like 11-12 goals. They just score a shit ton more than us. I still take Carlsson over Fantilli.Environment is definitely a huge part of it, physical maturity is the other piece of the puzzle.
Yeah the strength of roster/coaching is going unspoken here. We don't know yet if bulking up will help Leo catch up. Probably will but there's no hard guarantee.Fantilli was already a physically mature beast while Carlsson was a tall lanky string bean. We all knew this. Plus yeah Columbus has a much improved roster. I think they have like 5 20 goal scorers or something. Even their enforcer has like 11-12 goals. They just score a shit ton more than us. I still take Carlsson over Fantilli.
Also key reason you had to tank that year, finishing last …. At worse we would have had Bedard / Leo / or Adamo ….. I obviously thought we were drafting Adamo, and fell in love with the kid. But Leo really just has that can’t teach frame and length, same with Sennecke. If they blossom, player development is key, then we are set for the next decade plus.Agreed. I think everyone here would've preferred Bedard and then you could then and still can make a strong argument for either Leo or Fantilli. Losing the lotto sucked, but i gotta admit that has waned a ton over the past 2 years seeing how Bedard has played.
Ekblad joined the 20-29 club...Is this a phrase anyone uses to describe a 20 goal scorer?
Honestly, I think if we had picked Fanta and CBJ ended up with Leo I don't know how much better Leo would be performing but I'd bet Fanta would struggle here too.
Well. Leo does have Zegras to be fair. On paper that should count for something but Z has been struggling under Cronin too so. Not an ideal situation for anyone involved. At least Leo and Z seem to have decent enough chemistry but nothing I'd categorize as a special connection.Fantilli has Marchenko on RW, Leo has Killorn. That right there should basically end this debate. Lol. Plus the ice time factor.
Well. Leo does have Zegras to be fair. On paper that should count for something but Z has been struggling under Cronin too so. Not an ideal situation for anyone involved. At least Leo and Z seem to have decent enough chemistry but nothing I'd categorize as a special connection.
I still like the idea of the natural fit with Gauthier but you'd have to be on meth to break up that line with Mac and Colangelo right now. Maybe we get lucky and Sennecke becomes a natural fit with Leo. Can't really know until this fall though.They need a goal scorer on their line.
Fantilli has Marchenko on RW, Leo has Killorn. That right there should basically end this debate. Lol. Plus the ice time factor.