I love his old man inflection when he says the name "Vaakaaninen." Gonna miss him dearly.
This year I've learned that teams entering a rebuild in the NHL need to answer a very important question:
"What will our identity be on the other end of the rebuild?"
Notwithstanding the fact that the Flyers have only half-committed to a rebuild, I don't know what the hell they're trying to be. It's like the Red Wings or Sabres.
Its not that hard to understand what Red Wings are doing on the draft.
Sieder is very good for his draft and mostly better than Cozens, Brogerg, Sodestrom and Zegras.
Raymond is doing great and he is better than Laf, Rossi, Holtz, Drysdale etc.
Edvinsson is very good and mostly better than Eklund, Clarke, Boucher and Sillinger.
Cossa is doing good for his stage.
Kasper is doing fine and he is mostly doing better than Savoie, Geekie, Mateychuk.
Pellika is doing very good, Danielson isnt good for his pick, but - all of them are good two way players, most of them are profiling as harder to play against, mostly with good skating and speed. Its a clear identity on the draft.
They are doing pretty well for what they could do.
They didnt hit on second rounders - thats a miss.
Their problem is their free agent market work, their trade decisions. And unluck. They didnt have a chance to draft top notch player.
_____
Buffalo are trying to draft BPA I guess. They are clear image of that you cant just build on it only.
______
Anyway both teams made very good picks. Its just not enough for NHL. Flyers drafted one top notch player and thats all. Okay they drafted very good goalie prospect but its a long term story. And they didnt produce a lot of draft capital too. And they tried to compete for some reason without having something.