I'm really trying not to be biased here because Fitz at this point could do an interview while wearing an ugly colored suit and I'd probably bitch about the ugly suit he wore on camera. And all these stories are way more serious than a hockey executive doing a poor job constructing a team. These have real life implications and victims.
But I'm not completely sure if he knew about all that's went on. There's enough evidence to suggest he was at least thinking about it though, as we saw with the one year McLeod extension, two year Bastian extension. Maybe the one year McLeod extension was just supposed to be a bridge? I don't know.
Now if someone like me can watch McLeod's interview on camera during 2022 training camp and come to the conclusion that he looked like he was hiding something and very uncomfortable, questionable body language, etc, then I wonder if Fitz watched that interview and thought ''Hmmm, we may have a problem on our hands?''. He had to have at least thought about the McLeod situation and the possibility that he was very much a culprit in this.
But I know a lot of people were not happy with the timing of the ''State of the union'' address last season and extension announcement. And it definitely felt like a pattern interrupt.
A lot of people also hated that he signed Cal Foote to a two way contract at the time, as he was another one caught up in it and it probably should have been looked at as not the greatest PR move, especially since Cal Foote wasn't a useful player anyway. Not that being useful or not matters when you're a rapist or sex offender. That's definitely not of any importance what kind of player they are. Just saying that it doesn't look very good to sign him for the possibility he was in on this and he'd be here in the organization when the names came to light. With McLeod, at least we already had him in the organization to begin with and there wasn't much evidence that he was in on any of it that early on, but I'm sure the Devils braintrust thought about it either individually or possibly by committee.