Bluesnatic27
Registered User
- Aug 5, 2011
- 4,732
- 3,523
Usually this applies to making trades, or signings, or other matters relating to sport.I think Joel was wrong but I can understand the mindset of focusing on the task at hand. Would you want your coach to have a mindset of winning at all costs? In this case we found out you can take that too far? Win at most costs?
I think these guys push everything to the outside during the playoffs and they shouldn’t have pushed this situation? Was there a way to simultaneously play hockey and also properly handle a situation? Sure there was. But I bet a whole bunch of people told q to win at all costs along the way. Hard to program somebody to do something then delete them when they do it.
IMO, He served his time. Round 2 is acceptable. It’s okay to be wrong and be punished then recover.
If I were Betman I’d have required him to coach a year in the ahl to absorb some of the pr and also just to dig in the pain a little with all the bus rides and such.
Win at all costs crowd forgot the asterisk.
Win at all costs does not justify covering up a sexual assault case. Hockey is a game. Someone’s life should be valued more than winning a game.