Around the League Thread | Ixnay on Zerplanyay

Status
Not open for further replies.

MarkusNaslund19

Registered User
Dec 28, 2005
5,662
8,328
Bingo.

People kept going on about the 'failed core' when it hadn't failed at all and the reason the team had failed was bad coaching, bad management and lack of direction, and bad depth and supporting cast. And rather than trying to do fairly easy things to fix what was happening around our outstanding core players, people wanted to blow it up for a 50% chance that 6-7 years from now we might have core players that good again, with the same issues building a team around them.
Oh yes. I was having the same arguments and it felt like trying to kick water uphill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: andora

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,067
43,273
Junktown
Kyle Stich, from AFP Analytics, has a really interesting thread on the tax situation and Tavares.



He points out what the main problem for Tavares is he's a Canadian resident and this loophole is meant for non-residents.

 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,790
5,043
yeah my reading of that article is that tavares improperly declared his residency status when filing not that the cra has reinterpreted how signing bonuses are taxed

the retirement compensation agreement stuff seems like it doesn't really impact athletes except in as much as there seems to be a technical disagreement about how much income can be deferred when you are a non-tax resident. this might impact non-resident athletes but i don't think it applies to resident athletes
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

Jyrki21

2021-12-05
Sponsor
yeah my reading of that article is that tavares improperly declared his residency status when filing not that the cra has reinterpreted how signing bonuses are taxed
As a general rule of thumb, I've found almost all reporting on legal matters tends to miss the actual point in the hopes of driving interest/outrage from people who want to talk about the broader subject matter, not the decision/amendment under scrutiny itself.
 

Hit the post

I have your gold medal Zippy!
Oct 1, 2015
22,725
14,634
Hiding under WTG's bed...
yeah my reading of that article is that tavares improperly declared his residency status when filing not that the cra has reinterpreted how signing bonuses are taxed

the retirement compensation agreement stuff seems like it doesn't really impact athletes except in as much as there seems to be a technical disagreement about how much income can be deferred when you are a non-tax resident. this might impact non-resident athletes but i don't think it applies to resident athletes
A multi-millionaire should be able to afford to hire a good tax accountant to handle his income taxes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BimJenning

RandV

It's a wolf v2.0
Jul 29, 2003
26,948
5,066
Vancouver
Visit site
What's also missed in the discussion here is I don't know what the exact details would be but I'd imagine Tavares could make a lot more $$$ in sponsorship deals playing in Toronto than he could in tax breaks playing for say Florida.

Personally I'd say this is a singular millionaire tax case and doesn't have any broader implications for Canadian NHL teams.
 

AlainVigneaultsGum

Holidays in two days
Sponsor
Oct 26, 2012
3,627
5,885
Calgary, AB
😮😮😮😮😮

1000051725.jpg
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
18,535
10,479
Los Angeles
yeah my reading of that article is that tavares improperly declared his residency status when filing not that the cra has reinterpreted how signing bonuses are taxed
pretty sure that is not accidental. you can declare non residency as long as you don't live in Canada for more than 183 days a year. I am guessing if he doesn't stay in Canada in the offseason and with the amount of road games per year, he probably meets the condition to be a non-resident.
 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,702
4,887
I don't practice tax law but I did take income tax law in law school, and I recall that the test for residency isn't one of days per year or anything, but a wholistic test based on all the relevant factors. The fact that he's born and raised in Toronto, and plays in Toronto from October to May (with games on the road) is probably why the CRA is taking the position that he is a Canadian resident for tac purposes. I also assume he has a nice cottage in Ontario that he spends at least some time at during the summer.
 

Vector

Moderator
Feb 2, 2007
26,067
43,273
Junktown
pretty sure that is not accidental. you can declare non residency as long as you don't live in Canada for more than 183 days a year. I am guessing if he doesn't stay in Canada in the offseason and with the amount of road games per year, he probably meets the condition to be a non-resident.

I don't practice tax law but I did take income tax law in law school, and I recall that the test for residency isn't one of days per year or anything, but a wholistic test based on all the relevant factors. The fact that he's born and raised in Toronto, and plays in Toronto from October to May (with games on the road) is probably why the CRA is taking the position that he is a Canadian resident for tac purposes. I also assume he has a nice cottage in Ontario that he spends at least some time at during the summer.

 

Hodgy

Registered User
Feb 23, 2012
4,702
4,887

This particular tax treaty / exemption may stipulate a particular day threshold, but this isn't the case for general legal analysis for tax residency in Canada as I understand it.
 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,790
5,043
i had to reestablish canadian residency a few years ago (for tax reasons, ironically) and it's definitely not as simple as 'spend 183 days in a calendar year in canada'. i had to jump through hoops (buy property, open an office in vancouver, establish banking relationships) to prove i was a legitimate resident and not someone who was just trying to create a favorable tax situation
 

JAK

Non-registered User
Jul 10, 2010
4,653
4,351
In such a dispute like this, the simplest answer is the best answer, somebody screwed up.

Who? Tavares's agent and tax accountant most likely. This likely would be a study case for all agents and professional athletes advisors going forward, mostly about planning for UFA and possible tax liabilities.

Governments are not going to adjust a deal purely because one single athlete's advisors didn't understand the rules.
 

credulous

Registered User
Nov 18, 2021
3,790
5,043
rich people (especially the 'self made' ones) are really bad at listening to advice even when they are paying for it

tavares probably just didn't take advice to watch his time in canada carefully seriously and his tax person either took him at his word he was a non-resident (tax people don't generally verify this kind of thing. you need a separate tax lawyer to do it which tavares probably didn't bother retaining or failed to loop in if he had access through his management) or got told to file as a non-resident and they'd figure it out later in the courts if it came up

95% sure this is a case of someone figuring they could pay to make their problem go away and disregarding the advice they got that would have prevented the situation
 
  • Like
Reactions: Vector

StreetHawk

Registered User
Sep 30, 2017
27,930
10,730
rich people (especially the 'self made' ones) are really bad at listening to advice even when they are paying for it

tavares probably just didn't take advice to watch his time in canada carefully seriously and his tax person either took him at his word he was a non-resident (tax people don't generally verify this kind of thing. you need a separate tax lawyer to do it which tavares probably didn't bother retaining or failed to loop in if he had access through his management) or got told to file as a non-resident and they'd figure it out later in the courts if it came up

95% sure this is a case of someone figuring they could pay to make their problem go away and disregarding the advice they got that would have prevented the situation
Hard to say that exactly. But, his agent likely had to be working alongside or had contact with a tax specialist and should have discussed what Tavares needed to do in order to qualify for their desired outcome based on the structure of the contract they were looking for from Toronto as the other options were all US cities, so same old for him.

Who knows if his people laid it all out for him in terms of what he needed to do for that first year or not.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hit the post

Bleach Clean

Registered User
Aug 9, 2006
27,454
7,151
For me it's because I spent multiple offseasons arguing with people who wanted to blow this team up and start another rebuild, and those people were continually citing the Wings/Yzerman as the 'ideal' of a team doing things right because they were winning the Prospect Pool Cup and the Most Draft Picks trophy every year.

I don't particularly care about the Wings/Yzerman specifically (and I think he's actually just a pretty average GM), it's just that this situation is playing out pretty much exactly how I was telling people it would at the time, and showing how difficult it is to get from 'OMG LOOK AT ALL OUR PROSPECTS' to being an actual good team with actual NHL impact players driving the bus.

Fans act like tanking is this guaranteed formula for success and retooling on the fly is stupid and guaranteed to fail but Detroit is Exhibit 1A for how you can do everything 'right' in a tank and nothing is guaranteed. And like I tried telling the video games people for years, there are reasons that teams only tank like this as a last resort.


I had no idea that's why you were chastising the Yzerplan. Odd.

I'm not sure your point holds regardless because Yzerman definitely did not do everything right in a tank: He didn't secure a 1C or a 1G. Even a lower end tandem of Horvat + Larkin could have saved him.

Tanking is no guarantee. It never was.

What's interesting to me is that you can see Yzerman close off DET's ceiling by placing middling bets. VAN has done something similar by allocating their cap toward DeBrusk instead of an elite talent like Guentzel (or potentially growing a talent like Guentzel). The ideal has been forgone for the reality of a quick retool. Now we see if that lowered ceiling can be propped up by the depth to win it all.
 

strattonius

Registered User
Jul 4, 2011
4,497
4,992
Surrey, BC
I had no idea that's why you were chastising the Yzerplan. Odd.

I'm not sure your point holds regardless because Yzerman definitely did not do everything right in a tank: He didn't secure a 1C or a 1G. Even a lower end tandem of Horvat + Larkin could have saved him.

Tanking is no guarantee. It never was.

What's interesting to me is that you can see Yzerman close off DET's ceiling by placing middling bets. VAN has done something similar by allocating their cap toward DeBrusk instead of an elite talent like Guentzel (or potentially growing a talent like Guentzel). The ideal has been forgone for the reality of a quick retool. Now we see if that lowered ceiling can be propped up by the depth to win it all.

You're out of touch.

Signing Compher, Copp, Chiarot, or Holl (and I'm probably missing a few) is not the same as Jake Debrusk. And anyone that compares the two has made a mistake in their player analysis.

Not saying Debrusk is a world beater but when you factor in their contracts with age & upside, almost EVERYONE immediately predicted that the aforementioned group of Wings players were terrible signings.
 

Hit the post

I have your gold medal Zippy!
Oct 1, 2015
22,725
14,634
Hiding under WTG's bed...
Hard to say that exactly. But, his agent likely had to be working alongside or had contact with a tax specialist and should have discussed what Tavares needed to do in order to qualify for their desired outcome based on the structure of the contract they were looking for from Toronto as the other options were all US cities, so same old for him.

Who knows if his people laid it all out for him in terms of what he needed to do for that first year or not.
Wasn't that one of the reasons Tortorella had a residence in Port Roberts vs Vancouver? (I'm assuming it was for "tax purposes"?
 

arttk

Registered User
Feb 16, 2006
18,535
10,479
Los Angeles
Hard to say that exactly. But, his agent likely had to be working alongside or had contact with a tax specialist and should have discussed what Tavares needed to do in order to qualify for their desired outcome based on the structure of the contract they were looking for from Toronto as the other options were all US cities, so same old for him.

Who knows if his people laid it all out for him in terms of what he needed to do for that first year or not.
when you pay agent like 8% or something like that, I am guessing it doesn’t cover just getting you the contract and some other endorsement deals. modern sports agents services probably includes tax, financial management stuff and other services.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad