Toggle sidebar

Around the League 46: Sharks Finally Yank A Win Out Of Their Cloaca

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
HisIceness said:
Pretty accurate.

And, didn't sparklef*** get banned from the arena or did I dream that? Haven't seen anything about him and his shenanigans this season.
Click to expand...

I don't know if he was banned, but I can confirm I've not seen him at any games this year. He's kind of hard to miss, especially during pregame.

But, a reddit thread from about a month ago says he's still around the arena, so maybe he was just told to avoid Hanna.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG, WreckingCrew and HisIceness
1736860071553.gif


 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG, WreckingCrew, Stickpucker and 1 other person
Svechhammer said:
View attachment 960658

Click to expand...


It’s tough, because if it IS family situation, then obviously, that sucks and I hope everything goes well for him and his family. BUT, contracts normally aren’t terminated for what essentially amounts to a leave of absence. And this has been the last few days for that situation:

  • January 11: DeAngelo did not play for SKA in the 3rd period of the match against Dynamo. Rotenberg commented: "This is a hockey situation. We'll see what happens next."
  • Same day: Rotenberg on DeAngelo: "There are no stars in SKA, our team is a star. Only hockey reasons: fulfilling the game task, respect for the team.
  • January 12: Rotenberg sat Deangelo in the match with Dynamo – didn’t even let him on the bench.
  • January 13: DeAngelo has a minus 5 rating in his last 3 games for SKA. The defenseman hasn't scored any points in 4 games in a row.
  • January 14: Rotenberg on DeAngelo's departure: "We are parting as friends, Tony will speak kindly of his time in St. Petersburg. He may still play for SKA - we are leaving the door open"

So it’s certainly possible that it’s a family situation and it affected his play thinking about home. It’s also possible that they’re claiming it’s a family situation to save TDA some face
 
  • Like
Reactions: Bridgeburner96, Lempo, DaveG and 1 other person
HisIceness said:




This person has been stalking DeBrusk for years and moved to Vancouver to "be with him". Thankfully it looks like NHL arenas are aware of this person and their behavior.
Click to expand...


Yeah I knew about her issues with DeBrusk in Boston, but moving to Vancouver to follow him is crazy. Especially when it was made clear in Boston that she should stay away from him.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG and WreckingCrew
Jarry going on waivers at 2. How does that work salary wise and is there anyway for the Pens to eat some of it. I wouldn't care to take on his salary but if we could get him at a huge discount would he be worth trying to save? Led the league is shut outs last year.
 
Derailed75 said:
Jarry going on waivers at 2. How does that work salary wise and is there anyway for the Pens to eat some of it. I wouldn't care to take on his salary but if we could get him at a huge discount would he be worth trying to save? Led the league is shut outs last year.
Click to expand...
If you pick him up off waivers there is zero retention. The team picking Jarry up off waivers is on the hook for the full salary.

Once Jarry clears waivers, Pittsburgh can still trade Jarry with retention, but I doubt the Penguins are going to retain for 3+ seasons to a level Carolina would stomach for an acquisition.
 
  • Like
Reactions: DaveG, WreckingCrew and MinJaBen
Derailed75 said:
Jarry going on waivers at 2. How does that work salary wise and is there anyway for the Pens to eat some of it. I wouldn't care to take on his salary but if we could get him at a huge discount would he be worth trying to save? Led the league is shut outs last year.
Click to expand...
Pass, Jarry is f***ing awful, I'd rather count on Tokarski/Martin as the #3 than waste money and a spot on him
 
  • Like
Reactions: Blueline Bomber, DaveG, Wolfpuck and 1 other person
Chrispy said:
If you pick him up off waivers there is zero retention. The team picking Jarry up off waivers is on the hook for the full salary.

Once Jarry clears waivers, Pittsburgh can still trade Jarry with retention, but I doubt the Penguins are going to retain for 3+ seasons to a level Carolina would stomach for an acquisition.
Click to expand...
and said level would be the full f***ing 50% with the way Jarry has played.
 
Derailed75 said:
Jarry going on waivers at 2. How does that work salary wise and is there anyway for the Pens to eat some of it. I wouldn't care to take on his salary but if we could get him at a huge discount would he be worth trying to save? Led the league is shut outs last year.
Click to expand...

No, he’s very, very bad this year.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.

Ad

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top Bottom