The Faulker 27
Registered User
That's what they expect!
LIke a change up in baseball, except it never changes.
That's what they expect!
Who would have EVER guessed that cross-ice passes are going to beat the goalie way more often than muffin shots in close or long, forced point shots? I mean, everyone...except the Canes of course...
Sure, everyone knows that is what works....until the "extra" pass is made that gets broken up, then everybody wanted a shot instead. They are damned if the take the shot into the chest and damned if they attempt the pass across the ice that is broken up.Who would have EVER guessed that cross-ice passes are going to beat the goalie way more often than muffin shots in close or long, forced point shots? I mean, everyone...except the Canes of course...
Tampa trying to goon it up but the Rangers respond. Must be nice to have a team that isn't a complete pushover.
Some folks on here would tell you toughness doesn’t matter.
Nope, it sure does in playoff hockey. If roles were reversed and we had maroon going after us, which of our Canes would stop him or the other ruffians on the ice?
Rags had reeves.
TDA or Domi would probably respond by taking a stupid cross checking or slashing penalty, and that'd be about our most "physical" response.
Took my comment personally I see.Maybe you guys saw something I missed? I saw a bunch of guys wrestling and a couple gloved jabs, not too dissimilar from scrums the Canes have been involved in. Lorentz' response after the Trouba hit was way more aggressive and physical than anything I saw this game, but I guess that doesn't count because . . . ?
And when there is a scrum, it seems like the whole team does get involved these days, which wasn't always the case in the past. Besides TDA and Domi, when a scrum develops it seems like Nino, Tro, KK, Cole, Smith, Svech, and even Aho are fairly active participants (at least along the lines of what we saw last night).
I'll leave the argument as to the impact of "Canes toughness" on results for another time and place, but it sure seems to me like you're stretching the scrum last night to fit a preconception you have. Again, unless I missed how that somehow affected the game, in which case I'm certainly open to being filled in.
No, not at all. Just questioning the use of that particular sequence to support the "too soft" issue. Not that big a deal, just pointing out that opinions on it vary, and it seemed a bit like maybe confirmation bias given what I watched.Took my comment personally I see.
Everyone knew but Edmonton apparentlyNurse is atrocious. $9.25M well spent.
Well they do keep winningWell the Announcers are still all up in the Rangers Business..
If Cirelli hadn't turned that would have been the 4th player hit in the head by Trouba.. (Playoffs only)Trouba is such a trash bag.
Another great hit. Keep your head up.Trouba is such a trash bag.