weems
Registered User
- Jul 3, 2008
- 18,207
- 14,508
A strong point shot is a nice weapon to have, but it isn't why we struggle, and it isn't as critical on the PP as it once was. It's about effective puck movement, we are too passive, and too slow.
With the same group, we have been a top PP team for years... 7th in 23/24, 2nd in 22/23, 1st in 21/22... Of course that is regular season, and that's without a strong point shot. Bouchard has a great point shot, and it's made the Oilers MORE dangerous, but they were very effective before Bouchard, without a point shot.
PP's success are determined by getting high percentage shots, with cross crease, and cross seams being the most effective way to score. We are just too tentative, too slow.
Here is the Edmonton game last night... two PP goals.
![]()
Dallas Stars - Edmonton Oilers - May 27, 2025 | NHL.com
NHL Gamecenter - Dallas Stars vs. Edmonton Oilers, May 27, 2025 - summary, stats, boxscore, play by play, recap and more.www.nhl.com
Quick puck movement, cross crease/cross seam, where the goalie can't move quick enough to cover the empty net. Two goals on the PP.
There are two Carolina PP goals here... Carolina Hurricanes - Florida Panthers - May 24, 2025 | NHL.com
Very quick puck movement, cross crease for the second one... goalie out of position...
We are slow right now. We hold the puck, we skate around with it. We overthink the whole thing.... I think that's Marner's problem... especially in the playoffs... overthinking, getting tight and putting too much pressure on himself.... he can't get out of his own head, and just play hockey.
Matthews shooting going from elite, to meh sure as hell doesn't help. Last year, you give him an inch, and it's in the net.. super quick, super accurate. This year in the playoffs, he was leading the league in shots taken, and couldn't hit the barn door... 6.4% for a guy who career is 15.8%.. he is still second in the playoffs for shots.
This idea that you need a point shot, is a very old school thought process. These days, without a screen, or a tip in, that's a shot that likely isn't going in, and it's a very low probability. Point shots with traffic, score around 3% of the time.. without, around 1%.
![]()
But without a threat of a point shot, the opposing defence can just collapse the PK box down and take away those cross seam, cross crease, high percentage shots.
Essentially taking away passing lanes and time/space.
The two guys we ran at the top are virtually non scoring threats in Rielly and Marner, so team's can just focus on taking away the other three players who are the main scoring threats.
Maybe it's not as effective as some think but when you don't have anyone that can actually step into a one timer at the top or is a legitimate threat to snipe, teams can just start exploiting you and this shows up in a 7 game series.
You are 100% right about the puck also moving way too slow.
Last edited: