Could be real interesting to see what happens at the draft, as a fairly strong case could be made for moving up, staying at 6, or moving down.
-Moving up to 3/4 gives us a really good player, that also brings something to the table that we lack. Puljujarvi/Dubois are big bodies with skill and speed, and two way ability. In a not so deep draft it could be worth giving up some 2nds to add a piece like that.
-Staying at 6 would be a good option should one of Puljujarvi, Dubois or Tkachuk somehow slip to 6. Would also make sense if we have a defenceman as BPA at this point once the above mentioned players are likely gone.
-Moving back likely still gives us the player we want, should that be a forward, while gaining another 2nd which we could then use to move into the 1st again or to fill a hole in the current roster, or perhaps both.
I'd really support any of the 3 options in different scenarios.