Was really hoping we’d move on from McCarthy, but I definitely wasn’t holding my breath that it would actually happen.
Curious what Waddell's targets are and if he's just planning to throw $ at Ekblad. RD is such a desirable position that it requires an overpay at the best of times. Don't think divisional rivals are going to be giving them away for anything considered reasonable#1 issue is Right D. I go big game hunting. I am willing to make the big trade for a top right D. But if that fails I look for a guy like Jalen Chatfield of the Canes. I’d overpay for him. I hope our NHL scouts have really been analyzing other teams’ second and third right Ds looking for a solid 2RD for us.
Not to nitpick this but I've not seen anything that say he almost signed an offer sheet here.People keep saying this and there is no evidence of it. I’ve tried to find it, and never have.
Meanwhile there is actual proof of Marner almost signing an offer sheet with us the summer prior to the hub cities.
![]()
Did The Blue Jackets Approach Mitch Marner About a Potential Offer Sheet?
The Toronto Maple Leafs have Mitch Marner signed to a new six-year deal, but a new report states the Blue Jackets were interested in signing him to an offer sheet.www.1stohiobattery.com
From what I understand, Marner was "approached" with an OS from us. Agents just don't get "approached" with an offer sheet without it being negotiated with, or else we'd hear more and more about them in the media. Meaning Marner and his agent engaged in contract negotiations with us in order to strike a deal and have him potentially come here.Not to nitpick this but I've not seen anything that say he almost signed an offer sheet here.
What I have seen is that we approached him and he declined. Maybe he thought about it at the time for 5 seconds and said "F no I'm not coming to Columbus" and that was the end of it.
He was a young party guy probably at the time. Maybe his opinion is different as a married man expecting his first child now but he's also from the Toronto area so I doubt he goes anywhere.
Maybe it’s a difference in terminology but somebody has to start the conversation. We might have “approached” his agent with a serious offer. The agent did his job and presented the offer and he said no. It literally might have been as simple as that. I don’t believe there was any significant negotiating going on that makes it anywhere close to him signing here.From what I understand, Marner was "approached" with an OS from us. Agents just don't get "approached" with an offer sheet without it being negotiated with, or else we'd hear more and more about them in the media. Meaning Marner and his agent engaged in contract negotiations with us in order to strike a deal and have him potentially come here.
Now, was it a ploy to get more money from Toronto or get the contract with them done? Yeah, probably. But similar to Aho in Carolina/MTL, you don't just sign or negotiate an offer sheet unless you're willing to actually go there. Now, of course Marner never actually did sign. But he did negotiate.
Ownership hasn’t retained salary in a trade with a contract with multiple years on it, and you’re asking them To stomach a buyout for 12 years on the payroll not to play at a still decent number.I just don't get the aversion to buying out Severson. It "saves" 10.5 in cash that can be used to pay a different RD. If they do it right the cap hit over the next 6-7 years would approximate Severson's full hit, maybe a bit more. The last 6 years the hit would be 1.5 million which would be somewhere less than 2% of the cap. I don't see that as a major stumbling block.
If you trade with 50% retention that would cost 19mm in cash before considering the new guys salary.
![]()
Just because their strategy in the past hasn't been correct doesn't mean they need to perpetuate it. Circumstances are a lot different now than they have been in the past so what was wrong in their eyes before should now be looked at in a different light.Ownership hasn’t retained salary in a trade with a contract with multiple years on it, and you’re asking them To stomach a buyout for 12 years on the payroll not to play at a still decent number.
I legitimately believe we have a higher chance to trade for Connor McDavid than that happening.
Damn how bad does an equipment manager have to mess up to get fired?
Yes?So our equipment manager and video coach are holding us back? We need upgrades in those areas?
Speaking of, were Danforth and Kuraly enough better than them to clearly have a spot if they get re-signed?
unless don waddell thinks their skate blades weren't sharp enough there was zero reason to make a change at equipment manager.Yes?
If you say so I guess. With your intimate knowledge of the Jackets' hockey operations, I have no recourse but to take your word for it.unless don waddell thinks their skate blades weren't sharp enough there was zero reason to make a change at equipment manager.
I mean how could we possibly know the answer to that? Are we just assuming because the players made it onto the ice wearing the correct shirt every night that the guy is perfect at his job?unless don waddell thinks their skate blades weren't sharp enough there was zero reason to make a change at equipment manager.
Thanks and to be clear, this is just me asking questions, not making challenges, as sometimes it's hard to tell the difference online.Danforth is unquestionably one of our top 12 forwards. I wouldn't want to be in a room with Evason when/if he finds out that Wads didn't extend Danforth.
Kuraly I think has faded a bit but I'd still like his versatility and toughness at least in a 13-14F role.
By average "gamescore" it goes
Danforth
Kuraly / ZAR
Pyyhtia
Kunin
That stat happens to support my argument about these players, but obviously there are other ways of slicing things up.
I wouldn't equate Pyyhtia and Danforth. Danforth's pre CBJ career path was probably dictated by financial considerations.Was ZAR or Kunin later in the season better than Pyyhtia early in the season? Is Pyyhtia a reliable call-up guy at this point but not a roster guy? Maybe he's destined to be quad-A, but I feel like that was Danforth at some point in his career.
Speaking of, were Danforth and Kuraly enough better than them to clearly have a spot if they get re-signed?
In total agreement with all of this.Just because their strategy in the past hasn't been correct doesn't mean they need to perpetuate it. Circumstances are a lot different now than they have been in the past so what was wrong in their eyes before should now be looked at in a different light.
In my opinion it all comes down to is will Severson be a drag on a Cup pursuit over the next 6 years or not. If not, no problem.
If he is,he has to go sooner or later through whatever means necessary.
Danforth is unquestionably one of our top 12 forwards. I wouldn't want to be in a room with Evason when/if he finds out that Wads didn't extend Danforth.