GDT: Arizona @ Winnipeg March 21 @ 7pm TSN 3

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Status
Not open for further replies.
I got paralysis from analysis. Lol

But, I'll enter the fray! I think the rationale - if there is one - would be that a 2 goal lead is dangerous because it's just enough of a lead that a team might start to sit back a little, but not enough of a cushion to really lock a game down.

But really, for our purposes here it's mostly just a joke. Lol

Oh I understand the joke value for sure. I forget what All Star game it was when one team went up by 5 but got smoked for 6 straight, and the commentator deadpanned about how "a five goal lead was the most dangerous lead in hockey" :P

But strictly speaking, even if you're more complacent up by 2, once you get scored on, you're now back up by 1 and should be in "one goal lead mode", right?

I guess you'd have to compare "percentage of one goal leads blown" versus "percentage of same where you were also up by 2"? Like if you blew six games where you were up by one goal, but 4 of them were games where you were also up by 2, and only 2 of them were one that you were never up by one? There'd be an argument.

Sounds like I just gave myself a new math assignment :)
 
Momma... !!!

tenor.gif
touche I saw your post and I hit the rewind button lol
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad