See, if Stevie had traded back and picked Seider, I would probably not like it as much.
The fact they stepped up and picked him makes me giddy lol.
I woulda went with your boy over our boy based on what I do know.
I don’t get it buddy......
And then you ranked him two spots lower than that. For drama I guess?He was 16th on Bob's list, which is easily the best/most reliable list out there.
The problem with going BPA is they already have a good pipeline of young Fs. Too many prospects means you leave players hanging on the vine and ruin them a la Nyquist/Tatar/etc. They have Hronek, Cholowski, and McIsaac and it's not sure yet that any of them will really make the NHL.
I woulda went with your boy over our boy based on what I do know.
I don’t get it buddy......
Guys, look at this run on defenders... This is why they didn't trade back.
What forward prospects do we have that are currently at risk of being blocked? Veleno is the only forward prospect that we have that we can say has definitive top 6 upside in our pool. Those 3 dman all have top 4 upside, if we were drafting for need I think forward is what we would have gone for.
And then you ranked him two spots lower than that. For drama I guess?
Guys, look at this run on defenders... This is why they didn't trade back.
You said 15 before you said 18, silly boy.Huh? It's really not that hard to understand. Let me recap for you.
-Bob Mckenzie had him ranked at 16
-On my personal list, I had him at 18.
Make sense now?