With this logic Loui Eriksson is a goonReaves is without question a goon. He produces zero offensive output.
With this logic Loui Eriksson is a goonReaves is without question a goon. He produces zero offensive output.
The beer league part was a joke.Compared to your average NHL defenseman or forward.
Beer league, haha. If you don't think John Scott would have completely dominated any beer league game (both offensively and defensively) you're out of your mind.
His value was primarily derived from his size. Analytics show he was above average. Terrible offense, obviously.The beer league part was a joke.
But if you think Scott was better than average compared to the average NHL defenseman or forward you're the one who's out of his mind.
There's a reason he played 7 minutes a game. We're talking about a few shifts per period. He was a facepuncher because he was basically a redwood tree on skates. Nothing more.
John Scott was not good at any single aspect of the “game” he employed.Compared to your average NHL defenseman or forward.
Beer league, haha. If you don't think John Scott would have completely dominated any beer league game (both offensively and defensively) you're out of your mind.
Ryan Reaves sucks and has that elusive quality that he makes every team he goes to a Loser.Ryan Reaves is a better hockey player than most 4th liners and some 3rd liners. Dude can skate and pass pretty well. In another life he's probably a Lucic style but for now he's more of a banging two way forward imo
Scott was only in the NHL because he was 6'8" 280 lbs and was an okay skater for his enormous size. And I agree he wasn't a particularly good fighter. He just had an enormous size advantage to most people he fought.John Scott was not good at any single aspect of the “game” he employed.
At his size, if he was even a passable skater, he could have played an angular defensive game and been better than average based on his span with his stick in defensive lanes regardless of actual skill. Alas, he was horrible.
He could have been a good open-ice hitter, again horrible.
He was also possibly the worst “Enforcer” in the modern NHL in terms of actually Winning/Losing fights.
The John Scott experiment was an abject failure the likes of which the NHL has not seen in some time.
Compared to your average NHL defenseman or forward.
Beer league, haha. If you don't think John Scott would have completely dominated any beer league game (both offensively and defensively) you're out of your mind.
Absolutely not.Scott was only in the NHL because he was 6'8" 280 lbs and was an okay skater for his enormous size. And I agree he wasn't a particularly good fighter. He just had an enormous size advantage to most people he fought.
Scott was a poor man's Derek Boogaard.
Ryan Reaves is a better hockey player than most 4th liners and some 3rd liners. Dude can skate and pass pretty well. In another life he's probably a Lucic style but for now he's more of a banging two way forward imo
I'm surprised it took until the last post of the page for Desaluriers to get a mention. Easily one of the best heavyweight scrappers in the league, and has become a solid enough player to skate a regular 4th line shift. They even played him with Zegras for a few games - it didn't really work but speaks to the respect Deslauriers has earned.
There are 100% (non-contact) beer leagues where Scott would be nothing special, same with some contact senior leagues. He and players of his ilk are the exceptions that prove the rule that every NHL player is beyond belief better than every non-NHLer.
He was below mediocre in both junior B and NCAA
I do know. And what i said standsYou should know that Scott was a defenceman until the AHL. There’s a reason in the old NHL games he had a high defensive awareness (same with Deslauriers).