Mike C
Registered User
I've always said it's hockey not balletThere hasnt been a single fight. The new age fans want hitting to be illegal. Luckily they are an extreme minority. Evidenced by 4 nations. The people want tenacity and violence.
I've always said it's hockey not balletThere hasnt been a single fight. The new age fans want hitting to be illegal. Luckily they are an extreme minority. Evidenced by 4 nations. The people want tenacity and violence.
Still.doesn't explain why the fighting majors never declined if enforcers were
Good point.Fighting remained up because the league shifted away from real fights. Fights used to be a reaction to something happening on the ice.
In an attempt to make the sport less violent, fighting became more of an act and fights became scripted choreography. Team A has a tough guy and team B has a tough guy so let's let them fight.
The scripted fights could have caused the levels of fighting to remain the same.
Just an idea.
You can also more widely access games to watch.
Back in the day, so when Jagr was with the Rangers he had one of the highest contracts of the 4 major North American leagues and he wasn't behind by much.
Now Hockey trails behind all of them by a significant amount.
Your average American can't focus on the puck, that's why they needed to highlight the puck.
Americans love things they don't really need to pay attention to, thats why football is so popular. 3 hours to play, what like 11 minutes on an average game ?
You want to draw morr Americans than you already do, you need some animosity in the game.
These players might as well shake hands and hug after every game like they do in NBA.
f***in' Waffle House has more animosity than all of the sports.
The cheap shots were always there- often given by the enforcers supposed to be there to stop them.I think it's more about the integrity of the team to deal with it when you need to. Now days it's not there so you resort to cheap shot and passive aggressive things you see now. I think those things were more dealt and effectively than you see now.
15 - 20 years ago, Don Cherry started saying, regularly I may add, that the addition of the instigator penalty was going to lead directly to more rats in the game, and more and more cheap-shot artists.Sleazebag plays are up but that's coward stuff. NHL is to blame for that. I think they could be handling stuff way better than they have. Letting things get out of hand in those instances.
I don’t get why penalties don’t carry over to the next game. Suspension's do and they happen in the previous game. It just makes the end of the game a free for all if the other team knows there’s nothing to lose.
Thankfully, the Panthers have landed half a dozen hits directly to the head and managed to knock a goalie out of the series with a hit to the head.The Domi hit on Barkov was really egregious and the league was lucky it didn’t send the defending Selke winner to the ICU.
The league responded with a $5K fine, no suspension.
That tells you all you need to know.
Would hate to see the pearl clutchers response if they had experienced old school hockey. Will try to attach Roenicks face after getting worked by D. Hatcher.
And that comment was as wrong then as it is now.15 - 20 years ago, Don Cherry started saying, regularly I may add, that the addition of the instigator penalty was going to lead directly to more rats in the game, and more and more cheap-shot artists.
Combine that with the absolute ineptitude of the Department of Player Punishment, and nobody should be surprised that there is more and more stupid shit going on in the games.
Look at the difference between the mid 90s and now, 30 years later.
Look at the difference between the mid 90s and now, 30 years later.
Violence and dirty stuff are two different things. There is barely any violence in the playoffs. Just a bunch of dirty rats diving and head hunting. If there was real violence, diving and head hunting would not be as prolific as it's been this playoff. And of course if George Parros had a working brain.Are the playoffs becoming too violent?
I'll have my brains and ability to walk any time over any shitty ass soapbox and pile of paperlook bruv they make millions and MILLIONS of dollars. I mean come on there will be some risk involved. I guarantee you that almost 90% will take a cross check to the face for a big house and a Ferrari.
And there has never been so few people dying in wars compared to population.I can't tell if half the posts in this thread are satire or not...