Are the Kings built for the future? If so, how did they retool so fast?

CashMash

Registered User
Jun 5, 2015
3,240
757
Finland
I got my main questions in the thread title. Kopitar is aging gracefully, obviously, and they've had Doughty (though not after the preseason this year), but--one would think--with an aging core, that the kings were on the decline like the Pens are now despite their superstars. Looking at their records for seasons in the recent past, however, only the covid years and the year before that were noticeable downswings.

So, what are the Kings doing right? What factors have contributed to their success? Seeing as Kopitar is still a great player, are they in trouble once he retires, or have they managed to scratch together enough prospects to fill the pipeline?
 

CashMash

Registered User
Jun 5, 2015
3,240
757
Finland
Honestly I think it's a half baked retool/rebuild. Yea they might not be in the cellar, but their best players are still old man Kopitar and Doughty. Respectable in the standings, but aren't going to win a cup.

Doughty is great, but they seem to be doing fine so far without him this year. That's one of the reasons I made the thread. I am a little puzzled as to what has allowed them to transition to the next phase and whether they will fall off eventually.
 

Juxtaposer

Outro: Divina Comedia
Dec 21, 2009
50,538
25,127
Bay Area
Obviously not. Soon as Kopitar falls off they're going to be in the basement again. Byfield hasn't taken the next step. Clarke is the only exciting thing about that team and he's not even as good as I thought he would be.
 

kings11

Registered User
Sep 29, 2011
6,316
4,132
Las Vegas
The Kings, My Kings are not built for the future. They pissed that away by trading Brock Faber, Gabriel Vilardi and multiple 1st rounders and lesser role players..
they sold out and are now too good for the lottery but not good enough to be a contender sadly..
Blakes signings have been much better than his trades and he’ll likely continue to spend capital and assets to chase a mirage!
 
Last edited:

VivaLasVegas

Registered User
Sponsor
Jun 21, 2021
8,115
8,671
Lost Wages, Nevada
IMHO the Kings have done a good job retooling to be competitive within the Pacific division without being a realistic Cup contender, i.e., within the 12-16 band at the end of every season that gets them into the playoffs but onto the golf course early.

That's not necessarily a bad thing -- many other teams would like to make the playoffs regularly -- but it also means perpetual playoff frustration unless they make more substantial structural changes.
 
  • Like
Reactions: BaileyFan

Raistlin

Registered User
Aug 25, 2006
5,128
4,088
they drafted really well for a period, and built up a critical mass of good prospects, but their development was not as well executed. plus they bled assets in recent years, I don't believe they have a championship calliber roster, they are still buoyed by 37 year old Kopitar which, kudos to him, is still as relevant as ever.
 

The Nuge

Some say…
Jan 26, 2011
28,040
9,411
British Columbia
Their best forward is 37, and their best dman is 35. Sure, they have some young pieces in place, but Kopitar is going to be an absolutely massive hole to try and fill when he’s gone
 
  • Like
Reactions: olli

ScoreZeGoals

Boooorrrrriiiinnnnng
Jun 29, 2010
17,649
7,632
They have been trying to find Kopitar's replacement for over 5 years, and have failed. Kopitar refusing to fall off has kept them relevant, but they are FAR from being built for the future
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Nuge and olli

AfroThunder396

[citation needed]
Jan 8, 2006
39,708
25,503
Miami, FL
They tried to cut corners on their rebuild by trading away too much stuff. Reminds me of the Ray Shero Devils - thought they could get by with Botox, but it turns out they needed liposuction and a facelift.

They're largely kept up by a few aging Hall of Famers and a good overall team identity, but they really lack talent at critical positions. Their success the past two years is a bit of a mirage IMO. They will need to either blow it up and do a full tear-down-the-studs rebuild, or be stuck in wildcard hell like the Islanders and Predators are.
 
  • Like
Reactions: chris kontos

olli

Least biased user
Dec 2, 2016
3,881
2,139
Canada
Blake owes kopitar and doughty so much for keeping the kings good enough in the regular season for him to keep his job. I guess their D has been far better than expected despite doughty being out but that doesn’t change that they could have Faber back there as a legit number 1 replacement for doughty. They’ve done a good job drafting outside of their top picks but theyve fumbled top picks such as drafting Byfield over Stutzle who would’ve been a 1C replacement for kopitar.
 

chris kontos

Registered User
Feb 28, 2023
4,208
2,716
1st round playoff elimination
No good future draft picks
This is the future of the LA kings re tool mess
We have a toxic front office where a consultant and an idiot president collude to manipulate a hapless gm into making trades like pierre luc dubois and faber for fiala.
If the goal of this retool mess was winning in the playoffs, the retool is a farce.
 

BaileyFan

Registered User
Jun 14, 2023
708
1,426
It never fails to amaze me how little attention people outside of California pay to the Kings. Blake and Robitaille can blow up a rebuild and make several trades that would get them put into witness protection if they were in a Canadian market, yet one midseason win streak and they have outsiders going “whoa, LA is good, how’d they pull it off?”

Meanwhile in Toronto you have Keefe getting clowned for making postseason comments that aren’t half as ridiculous as stuff that comes out of the Kings front office on the regular. I really think LA, with its combination of being able to print money yet stay completely anonymous, is the only market in the league where Rob and Luc could survive and thrive for this long.
 

chris kontos

Registered User
Feb 28, 2023
4,208
2,716
My favorite marketing slogan gem from the kings front office:
"Tradition moves us forward"
Could be a good motto for a museum- but for a hockey team?
 

BKarchitect

Registered User
Oct 12, 2017
8,354
15,028
Kansas City, MO
The interesting thing is they are doing it with a crap year from Fiala and QB being mostly a non-factor. Along with Doughty being out.

Most of their new guys have seemingly thrived. Kuemper has really heated up and behind that Kings system, his increase in SV% was predictable. Less so is that Joel Edmundson would turn back the clock and be a 21 minute per night, positive physical defensive top four guy. Foegele also super solid. Of course you’ve got Laferriere breaking out. And just some quality depth. On defense, Gavrikov and Anderson are just so sound and Clarke has really added some juice.

I don’t believe in them like I do the Caps, but considering they’ve done this without DD and Fiala and QB struggling - clearly this is at minimum a playoff team. They are too competent and play too well defensively (3rd in GA/GP and by far #1 in lowest shots against) to fall past the 7/8 seed. This is a high baseline team.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad