Are Capitals pretenders or real contenders?

  • We sincerely apologize for the extended downtime. Our hosting provider, XenForo Cloud, encountered a major issue with their backup system, which unfortunately resulted in the loss of some critical data from the past year.

    What This Means for You:

    • If you created an account after March 2024, it no longer exists. You will need to sign up again to access the forum.
    • If you registered before March 2024 but changed your email, username, or password in the past year, those changes were lost. You’ll need to update your account details manually once you're logged in.
    • Threads and posts created within the last year have been restored.

    Our team is working with Xenforo Cloud to recover data using backups, sitemaps, and other available resources. We know this is frustrating, and we deeply regret the impact on our community. We are taking steps with Xenforo Cloud to ensure this never happens again. This is work in progress. Thank you for your patience and support as we work through this.

    In the meantime, feel free to join our Discord Server
Contenders. That said, the odds for any one team to win 2 rounds this year are 40% or worse, so that doesn’t mean a whole lot.

IMG_8528.jpeg



Their lack of super-elite high end scoring talent will be their biggest issue IMO.

Power play isn’t very good and has a tendency to give up back breaking SHG’s (two vs Winnipeg earlier this year — had two shorthanded penalty shots against that game, which I’ve never seen before)

Both goalies are below average puck handlers which will be magnified in a tight checking series

And personally I have concerns about how effective Carlson will be against an aggressive team that plays fast. Same with Eller and McMichael.

Every team has its flaws though and the Caps are lucky to be going into the playoffs at full health.
 
They have the best Connor Mc, so obvious contenders (Leafs expected to sign Connor McGregor before the playoffs start)
 
I think they have a good team in the regular season, but their foundation is weak. I see them being out as early as 2nd round. I do think they have Stanley Cup potential, but I also see them being out as early as round two.

As a Jets fan I think Florida repeats. And I live, shout True North, and always say Go Jets Go and want the Jets to win the cup!
 
I think they have a good team in the regular season, but their foundation is weak. I see them being out as early as 2nd round. I do think they have Stanley Cup potential, but I also see them being out as early as round two.

As a Jets fan I think Florida repeats. And I live, shout True North, and always say Go Jets Go and want the Jets to win the cup!
What do you mean the foundation is weak?

I'm genuinely curious as to what that means.
 
Since we're on the topic, here are some strengths/weaknesses/question marks of the team that might fly under the radar...

Strengths:

1. Balanced, versatile blueline. The lowest TOI on the blueline is Trevor van Riemsdyk at 17:23. All the others are at 19 minutes and above, with Carlson at 23:34, one of the lowest averages in his career. They're rolling through their pairings without sheltering or favouring anyone, which is also reflected in how fluid they are: Carlson's spent 41% of his ES time with Sandin, 32% with Chychrun, 22% with Fehervary. So, they can mix and match however they need. Typically, it's been Sandin-Carlson, Fehervary-Roy, Chychryun-TVR with Chychrun moving up to pair with Carlson when pressing for offense.

2. Pierre-Luc Dubois and Nic Dowd's matchup capabilities. Dowd has been probably the best 4th liner in hockey for a few years running now, and his shutdown role has only continued to grow under Spencer Carbery, as his line is more of a pseudo 3rd line than anything. Here's a cool video about Dowd. Dubois has done extremely well matched against the elite Cs of the league, night after night, and should really get some Selke votes. I tabulated these a few days ago, it's PLD's numbers this year against McDavid/MacKinnon/Matthews/Barkov/Eichel/Hughes/Crosby:

Them: 16gp, 3g, 7a, 10p, -20
Him: 16gp, 3g, 12a, 15p, +14

Weaknesses:

1. Powerplay. They haven't scored a PPG in like three weeks. I guess the good news is that they're below-average in powerplay opportunities, and they aren't having any trouble scoring without it, so they aren't PP reliant at all like they were in the glory days of choking away Presidents' Trophy seasons, but it's still an issue. It really feels like they're trying to force feed Ovechkin the puck right now to get those goals up.

2. Dylan Strome. He's leading the team in scoring this year, but you can see it when you watch him, the impact doesn't match the totals. His skating just doesn't allow him to take control of a shift in the way Dubois can, and since Strome is almost always lined up next to Ovechkin, who at 39 years old relies heavily on his linemates to do the dirty work for him, it could be a real problem in a seven game series against a top team.

Question Marks:

1. Goalie tandem. It feels like Washington is ahead of the curve in going with a tandem rather than relying a workhorse starter, as starter GP numbers are on a downward trend over the past ten years. Thompson is 25th in games started this year, while Lindgren is 33rd. That's going to change in the postseason, when Logan Thompson is given full rein over the goal. How's he going to handle that after seven months of sharing the net? I dunno.

2. Third line. Their third line has been a revolving door of mid for the entire season. Right now they've settled on Mangiapane-Eller-Raddysh, and they're actually doing a bit better with that combo lately than most of the season, but for the most part they've had to overplay the Dowd line to compensate. Mangiapane's been scoring, and Eller is the best they've got left at C, so those two guys are probably locked in, but we can already squint and see Ryan Leonard taking Raddysh's spot at 3RW when Boston College's season wraps up just before the end of the regular season. How will he do there if he signs? I dunno.
 
pretty sure Ovi retires after game 82 because in the playoffs Washington can't keep carrying his slow ass to score 99 record goals.

Ovechkin is 4th in goals despite missing 16 games.

Ovechkin's team has the most points in the NHL, and a higher winning percentage with Ovie than without.

Your post is not indicative of the facts.
 
This Canes team is red hot and 2nd in the conference.

Necas to Stankoven isn't a team destroyer. And it's not like Necas has carried them in past playoffs.
I think Washington has a lot more size than Carolina which should bode well for them in the playoffs. Carolinas pp is also ice cold.

I think Carolina would really depend on home ice advantage to dictate matchups and without that I'd pick the Caps over the Canes in 7.
 
  • Like
Reactions: hn777
I think Washington has a lot more size than Carolina which should bode well for them in the playoffs. Carolinas pp is also ice cold.

I think Carolina would really depend on home ice advantage to dictate matchups and without that I'd pick the Caps over the Canes in 7.
It should be at least a 6 or 7 game series.
 
1st/2nd round exit.

Lots of their core players (Chychrun, Strome, Protas, Sandin, MicMichael, etc.) don't have much experience in the post-season.
 
1st/2nd round exit.

Lots of their core players (Chychrun, Strome, Protas, Sandin, MicMichael, etc.) don't have much experience in the post-season.
Maybe. I would guess most playoff teams have a handful of guys with little to no prior experience though. As long as there are enough vets who have been there before to set the tone I don't think that's necessarily a massive disadvantage.

Caps also have a lot of guys who came up through Hershey and were a part of deep runs there (back to back Calder Cups) and that experience shouldn't be discounted.. AHL playoff MVP Hendrix Lapierre was probably the best Cap vs the Rangers last year despite having no NHL playoff experience
 

Ad

Ad