Player Discussion Arber Xhekaj: The Sheriff

Andy

Registered User
Jun 26, 2008
32,181
16,858
Montreal
So does Matheson. And he's never getting better. And neither is Anderson, or Dvorak. So what?? Like what does your response achieve other than spam?
I’m not even gonna even elaborate why Matheson has more rope than Arber.

Matheson, with all his flaws is a far superior Dman to Arber. This is just silly.

Everyone is defender a version of Arber that doesn’t exist. His toughness does not make up for the fact that he just hasn’t been good defensively. And it’s not like he makes up for it by pushing the play offensively.

Right now, he’s a liability on the ice and punching faces doesn’t change that.

It’s the classic thing we see over and over on this board with tougher players. They need to bring more than just their aggressivity.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,408
71,572
Texas
I’m not even gonna even elaborate why Matheson has more rope than Arber.

Matheson, with all his flaws is a far superior Dman to Arber. This is just silly.

Everyone is defender a version of Arber that doesn’t exist. His toughness does not make up for the fact that he just hasn’t been good defensively. And it’s not like he makes up for it by pushing the play offensively.

Right now, he’s a liability on the ice and punching faces doesn’t change that.

It’s the classic thing we see over and over on this board with tougher players. They need to bring more than just their aggressivity.
Fair enough but maybe you send him down for more development. He hasn't been good.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: 417

417

Cole "Cold" Palmer
Feb 20, 2003
52,397
30,214
Ottawa
I’m not even gonna even elaborate why Matheson has more rope than Arber.

Matheson, with all his flaws is a far superior Dman to Arber. This is just silly.

Everyone is defender a version of Arber that doesn’t exist. His toughness does not make up for the fact that he just hasn’t been good defensively. And it’s not like he makes up for it by pushing the play offensively.

Right now, he’s a liability on the ice and punching faces doesn’t change that.

It’s the classic thing we see over and over on this board with tougher players. They need to bring more than just their aggressivity.
Its kind of odd that you have to explain why Matheson and Xhekaj, aren't treated the same.

When Xhekaj, hopefully has near 600 NHL games under his belt, he’ll benefit from the same benefit of the doubt that Matheson has.

Unfortunately for him, just Struble and Barron, he has to being a baseline game, every game to stay in the lineup.

That's why Hutson plays every game, not because he's flawless, but every game he at least brings his “B” game.

There's not large fluctuations in his game.

Its just about being consistent for Xhekaj, play physical when you have the chance, be solid defensively.

That's the bare minimum he needs to do to stay in the lineup every game.
 

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,194
5,876
The egregious mistakes are baked in the Matheson package. That will never change or improve. He's on the team because he compensates by producing offensively. He helps the team more than he hurts it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: 417

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,217
58,296
Citizen of the world
The egregious mistakes are baked in the Matheson package. That will never change or improve. He's on the team because he compensates by producing offensively. He helps the team more than he hurts it.
No he does not. He hurts the team offensively and defensively.

The fact he's on pp1 hurts our offense. The fact he's so goddammed horrible defensively hurts the team. The fact he's not a good vet that's held accountable hurts the team. He's a bottom pairing D.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Habs13

Kennerback

Registered User
Jun 2, 2021
4,194
5,876
No he does not. He hurts the team offensively and defensively.

The fact he's on pp1 hurts our offense. The fact he's so goddammed horrible defensively hurts the team. The fact he's not a good vet that's held accountable hurts the team. He's a bottom pairing D.
I think he helps the team more than he hurts us, but you are right that he shouldn't be on PP1 and especially on 5 on 3. The problem is Barron f*** up a lot too with brain cramps. And if you want Xhekaj and others might make poor judments (but for me it's different than brain cramps)..

The equation is simple, Matheson brain cramps + 5 sharp Ds= completely fine. But Matheson Brain cramps + Barron Brain cramps + other poor D decisions= absolute defensive shitshow.
 

Artaud

Registered User
Jul 21, 2012
960
264
No he does not. He hurts the team offensively and defensively.

The fact he's on pp1 hurts our offense. The fact he's so goddammed horrible defensively hurts the team. The fact he's not a good vet that's held accountable hurts the team. He's a bottom pairing D.
He would be a plus player if only he wasn't asked to fill in a role he isn't meant to fill.

I really think if you give Matheson 2nd pair minutes and put him on the 2nd wave of powerplay, the mistakes would be few and far between.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,217
58,296
Citizen of the world
He would be a plus player if only he wasn't asked to fill in a role he isn't meant to fill.

I really think if you give Matheson 2nd pair minutes and put him on the 2nd wave of powerplay, the mistakes would be few and far between.
He's playing 2nd pair minutes this year.
Thanks for proving the point.

The reality is ues never been a 2nd pair D. Hes always been a bottom pair D. We're just so starved for talent that we accept anything
 

Walksss

Registered User
Mar 26, 2013
649
1,224
He's playing 2nd pair minutes this year.
Thanks for proving the point.

The reality is ues never been a 2nd pair D. Hes always been a bottom pair D. We're just so starved for talent that we accept anything

He averages 22:56 of ice time per game, the most on the team, thus he is objectively not playing 2nd pairing minutes.

Besides by even any insane metric you can try to conjure up Xhekaj is significantly worse than Matheson, even with all his faults. If X played nearly 23 minutes a night this horrific team would be utterly unwatchable. Maybe you'd like it though but thankfully nobody in real life could possibly agree.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,217
58,296
Citizen of the world
I think he helps the team more than he hurts us, but you are right that he shouldn't be on PP1 and especially on 5 on 3. The problem is Barron f*** up a lot too with brain cramps. And if you want Xhekaj and others might make poor judments (but for me it's different than brain cramps)..

The equation is simple, Matheson brain cramps + 5 sharp Ds= completely fine. But Matheson Brain cramps + Barron Brain cramps + other poor D decisions= absolute defensive shitshow.
It's because there's too many pmds.

He averages 22:56 of ice time per game, the most on the team, thus he is objectively not playing 2nd pairing minutes.

Besides by even any insane metric you can try to conjure up Xhekaj is significantly worse than Matheson, even with all his faults. If X played nearly 23 minutes a night this horrific team would be utterly unwatchable. Maybe you'd like it though but thankfully nobody in real life could possibly agree.
 

Attachments

  • Screenshot_20241102_145643_Chrome.jpg
    Screenshot_20241102_145643_Chrome.jpg
    69.3 KB · Views: 1

Walksss

Registered User
Mar 26, 2013
649
1,224
It's because there's too many pmds.

You know he plays PP and PK though right? Like, I know you know so this disingenuous argument we're about to get into doesn't need to even start.

At the end of the day Mike Matheson plays the most minutes per night of any Montreal Canadien. I don't need you to turn yourself into a pretzel trying to tell me how that equals a 2nd pairing defenceman.
 

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,705
5,733
Visit site
It's not rooocket science...even for the rooocket scientist on HF.

X needs more development OR to play with a veteran so he can learn the finer points of the game and cut down on his mistakes. We do NOT have a Markov or a high quality defensive coach or a system he can learn.

We got SmartyMarty who looks not so smart through every game. He's more concerned about the big picture and soon about his job.

Right now, X is stuck in no mans land and nothing is happening for him...
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,217
58,296
Citizen of the world
You know he plays PP and PK though right? Like, I know you know so this disingenuous argument we're about to get into doesn't need to even start.

At the end of the day Mike Matheson plays the most minutes per night of any Montreal Canadien. I don't need you to turn yourself into a pretzel trying to tell me how that equals a 2nd pairing defenceman.
The measure of a pairing is at ES/5v5. Not on the PP. Powerplay is easy minutes, it doesn't impact the mistakes he's supposed to not make.

The argument you're making doesn't work because his quality of play wouldn't go up if he somehow got 30 less seconds of powerplay and fell below a second of Guhle/Hutson.
 

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,067
16,792
Struble and Barron sucks too and doesnt near the swag Xhekaj brings to the lineup. He should play all game. Nobody has clearly outplayed him.
Xhekaj brings shit to the lineup - pro scouts have figured out he possesses low IQ play reading and subpar lateral mobility. Swag had value for 4th liners and 3rd pairing Dman 20 years ago .. not anymore

Hughes coached Struble w Boston Jr Eagles and MSL coached against him w MidFairfield - Struble also possesses high end skating / edges which both value… Xhekaj simply doesn’t
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad