Player Discussion Arber Xhekaj: The Sheriff

Walksss

Registered User
Mar 26, 2013
633
1,191
Not the defense thread, but I find it rich to read that Arber is part of the core and Struble is meh when Struble has legit been the better of both d-men and by a mile.

In a lot of people's minds on here Xhekaj hasn't been bad. It goes to show you how few people are actually watching the games before they post their opinions.

If they are watching the games and they come away thinking Xhekaj at 24 years old right now is part of the core then good lord.

I did like his rush yesterday though, a nice highlight in a sea of lowlights.

EDIT: I just realized this is the Demidov thread and I'm talking shit about X. My bad.

In the spirit of this thread i truly believe that if Demi was over here this year he'd be the best player on the team. What an absolute superstar talent. Can't wait to see him here, but I also can't wait until the next SKA game already, good times.
 

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,075
20,222
Quebec City, Canada
I don't think we develop an inch without fixing some holes, I'm worried we go backwards this year which isn't good. I'm all for the rebuild, but all these kids just need to play even if they suck on any given night. Keep them out there.
I don't think you can go backward because of one year. Beside we can't really fix holes before the deadwood is gone. I know some fans think it's easy to ship bad contracts to useless players to other teams without paying a 1st round pick but it's not that easy specially with Arizona gone. They are trying kids to see what they got and honestly it's fine people panic for no reason imo. Pens rebuild went like this.

2001-2002 : 69 points
2002-2003 : 65 points
2003-2004 : 58 points
2004-2005 : lockout
2005-2006 : 58 points (no progression after a year long lockout despite having Crosby in the lineup that must have been a pretty massive disappointement but did they went backward ...)
2006-2007 : 105 points (nope they did not)

In a lot of people's minds on here Xhekaj hasn't been bad. It goes to show you how few people are actually watching the games before they post their opinions.

If they are watching the games and they come away thinking Xhekaj at 24 years old right now is part of the core then good lord.

I did like his rush yesterday though, a nice highlight in a sea of lowlights.

EDIT: I just realized this is the Demidov thread and I'm talking shit about X. My bad.

In the spirit of this thread i truly believe that if Demi was over here this year he'd be the best player on the team. What an absolute superstar talent. Can't wait to see him here, but I also can't wait until the next SKA game already, good times.
This year defensively he's as bad as Barron imo. I'm not giving up on him but he'll have to improve or he'll remain a 7th dman.
 

Tyson

Registered User
Mar 1, 2007
49,197
71,270
Texas
Chris Nilan who I respect thinks Xhekaj is playing afraid to make mistakes and is confused with how he should play which has clearly led to a player that looks worse now than he did when he was a rookie.
Coming from one of us you could take it with a grain of salt but coming from a former player that might be accurate.
 

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,461
17,015
I don't think you can go backward because of one year. Beside we can't really fix holes before the deadwood is gone. I know some fans think it's easy to ship bad contracts to useless players to other teams without paying a 1st round pick but it's not that easy specially with Arizona gone. They are trying kids to see what they got and honestly it's fine people panic for no reason imo. Pens rebuild went like this.

2001-2002 : 69 points
2002-2003 : 65 points
2003-2004 : 58 points
2004-2005 : lockout
2005-2006 : 58 points (no progression after a year long lockout despite having Crosby in the lineup that must have been a pretty massive disappointement but did they went backward ...)
2006-2007 : 105 points (nope they did not)
The Pens rebuild was 100% designed around tanking for Sid and Malkin. You get those 2, Letang and Fleury, it's an easy build up from there. The next two drafts have franchise players you can do the same with, so I'm thrilled if we stink it up for a bit. I worry that we get all this talent and the right guy leading the charge.

How many years do you give MSL to see how this team evolves? I'm not sure, I can see him not lasting 2 more years at this rate. I'll let him get Laine, Demidov and a couple young picks up here before totally throwing him under the bus, but I don't like a lot of what I'm seeing now.
 

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,461
17,015
Chris Nilan who I respect thinks Xhekaj is playing afraid to make mistakes and is confused with how he should play which has clearly led to a player that looks worse now than he did when he was a rookie.
Coming from one of us you could take it with a grain of salt but coming from a former player that might be accurate.

he's 100% afraid , you can see it. Imagine being the only guy who gets sat when you mess up, and the other losers just get a free pass
 

Walksss

Registered User
Mar 26, 2013
633
1,191
It's obvious the league now has tape of Xhekaj and every forward in the league knows how to play him both off the rush, which is easy, and on a cycle.

No matter how much you guys love him he has some of the heaviest feet in the NHL and doesn't really have the processing ability to make up for it. Experience is gonna help obviously but how much is questionable with limitations this glaring, the guys ceiling is not that high.

I've rarely seen a defenceman get so routinely deleted in man on man coverage in zone like he does. Players use superior edgework to create enough space to drive an aircraft carrier through it. In the modern NHL that is a massive problem that he will have a very hard time fixing. I don't think an average skating 240 pound Dman is gonna improve his agility all that much but I hope to be wrong.

This isn't to say the other young D aren't without warts but they are all far superior skaters. Barron makes bonehead decisions and is softer but the skating talent is undeniable, thus a much higher ceiling. Hutson is tiny but come on, no comparison. Struble is a bottom pairing guy but even his skating is better than X. Mailloux needs way more AHL time but his skating and offensive IQ are world's better. The vets are the vets; they'll be gone soon enough.

Maybe this is the wrong system for X, maybe he'd be dominant in a zone system where he can just punish people directly in front of the net all game. I certainly don't want that system implemented in Montreal though, it doesn't work that well in the modern day and I wouldn't want to change the entire playbook for one player. He needs to adapt and quickly. There is a metric ton of work to do, let's hope he does it.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Matthew McConaughay

LaP

Registered User
Jun 27, 2012
26,075
20,222
Quebec City, Canada
The Pens rebuild was 100% designed around tanking for Sid and Malkin. You get those 2, Letang and Fleury, it's an easy build up from there. The next two drafts have franchise players you can do the same with, so I'm thrilled if we stink it up for a bit. I worry that we get all this talent and the right guy leading the charge.

How many years do you give MSL to see how this team evolves? I'm not sure, I can see him not lasting 2 more years at this rate. I'll let him get Laine, Demidov and a couple young picks up here before totally throwing him under the bus, but I don't like a lot of what I'm seeing now.
i think MSL is here for the rebuild to not have a coach who would need to win to protect his job (like Michou). MSL made lot of money already it's like a hobby for him. He's here for the rebuild and i'm almost certain he'll be gone when the rebuild will be over.
 

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,461
17,015
i think MSL is here for the rebuild to not have a coach who would need to win to protect his job (like Michou). MSL made lot of money already it's like a hobby for him. He's here for the rebuild and i'm almost certain he'll be gone when the rebuild will be over.
I think so as well, but they really need to find an assistant to help him out
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaP and Andrei79

salbutera

Registered User
Sep 10, 2019
15,051
16,771
i think MSL is here for the rebuild to not have a coach who would need to win to protect his job (like Michou). MSL made lot of money already it's like a hobby for him. He's here for the rebuild and i'm almost certain he'll be gone when the rebuild will be over.
MSL will stay as long as he wants to remain coach… he’s got carte blanche, but I expect he’ll quit within 2-years to return to US to be close to his CT home / family
 
  • Like
Reactions: LaP

417

Cole "Cold" Palmer
Feb 20, 2003
52,341
30,122
Ottawa
Chris Nilan who I respect thinks Xhekaj is playing afraid to make mistakes and is confused with how he should play which has clearly led to a player that looks worse now than he did when he was a rookie.
Coming from one of us you could take it with a grain of salt but coming from a former player that might be accurate.
Xhekaj, like a lot of players on this team is playing like someone whose afraid to make mistakes.

Nilan just has more sympathy because he's a former fighter and Xhekaj can fight too.
 

HabsAddict

Registered User
Feb 27, 2002
7,666
5,699
Visit site
I'm a huge fan of X and Mailman but....

This is what i wrote elsewhere on Mailman that also applies to X

......


You can't put Mailman and X together. It's like putting a one eyed man with a one eyed man and expecting stereo vision.

Both of them make mistakes coming out of their wazoo. Both need to play with a Savard or Guhle, neiher is going to develop any time soon at this rate.

We just can't ignore Maiman lost 3 years of development and X wasn't even drafted.

Last night they both proved stupidity level that needs erasing. X passed the puck and it was intercepted, IF Mailman was much further back along the backboards, X would of had more room to flip it to him instead of a low trajectory pass that was intercepted. Dummy 1 and Dummy 2. My big question is, are they getting coached about the devil of the details? This kind of thinking and a million other details isn't slapping them in the face and they need to learn it, which will take time.

This is the kind of in game stuff that a veteran like Weber or Markov could communicate...instead of those two trying to see the game with...one eye each.

Lastly, as a package, neither Struble or Barron can match Mailmans or X overall ability, but Mailman gets the boot. Because they can.
 

Habs

Who needs Michkov when you've got Bustbacher
Feb 28, 2002
22,461
17,015
I'm a huge fan of X and Mailman but....

This is what i wrote elsewhere on Mailman that also applies to X

......


You can't put Mailman and X together. It's like putting a one eyed man with a one eyed man and expecting stereo vision.

Both of them make mistakes coming out of their wazoo. Both need to play with a Savard or Guhle, neiher is going to develop any time soon at this rate.

We just can't ignore Maiman lost 3 years of development and X wasn't even drafted.

Last night they both proved stupidity level that needs erasing. X passed the puck and it was intercepted, IF Mailman was much further back along the backboards, X would of had more room to flip it to him instead of a low trajectory pass that was intercepted. Dummy 1 and Dummy 2. My big question is, are they getting coached about the devil of the details? This kind of thinking and a million other details isn't slapping them in the face and they need to learn it, which will take time.

This is the kind of in game stuff that a veteran like Weber or Markov could communicate...instead of those two trying to see the game with...one eye each.

Lastly, as a package, neither Struble or Barron can match Mailmans or X overall ability, but Mailman gets the boot. Because they can.

24hr ban for using the nickname 'Mailman' !
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad