Player Discussion Arber Xhekaj: The Sheriff

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,340
7,672
He was available and did his job.
In the regular season, if you get multiple game misconducts (with 41 game span), you have to sit out a game. And it increases each time.

The occasional one is fine - it will happen - but he’s 2 for 2.

He has to find the sweet spot where he isn’t being kicked out of games. I’m sure he will.
 

David Suzuki

Registered User
Aug 25, 2010
18,091
9,565
New Brunswick
In the regular season, if you get multiple game misconducts (with 41 game span), you have to sit out a game. And it increases each time.

The occasional one is fine - it will happen - but he’s 2 for 2.

He has to find the sweet spot where he isn’t being kicked out of games. I’m sure he will.

He shouldn't have been tossed in either game, not his fault refs are soft. Or in the case of last night just incompetent.
 

Frankenheimer

Sir, this is an Arber
Feb 22, 2009
4,006
1,881
MTL
He took a braindead penalty that gave Ottawa three quick goals.

I get that a lot of people like that he cheapshots people for some reason I'll never truly understand but in the short time he's played the last two games, he put the team shorthanded for 12 minutes.

He has a bad temper that hurts the team more often than it helps. He can be a decent player but he needs to calm the f*** down.
If he was doing this in the regular season, I think everyone would agree with you. But not sure what you propose as an altnerative. The refs are not doing their job and opposing players are not respecting our players. And I don't mean a little face wash at the net. They are literally running our top players with serious consequences. Then when the players are asked to face the music, they don't.

The game is set up with codes which if not respected does not leave many choices. Two games, two idiots running our guys, two idiots who then keep their gloves on and avoid answering for their actions.

I don't want Xhekaj to blindside anybody, but he has to play with an edge, for now, while other teams take note of what happens when you run our guys. They have to believe there will be consequences that cannot be avoided by hiding all game or the deterrent wont work.

The players are livid. Did you see Evans at the intermission. Players are pissed off and they 100% have Arbers back.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,915
58,996
Citizen of the world
Fair is fair, so should Greig get anything? Dach's nowhere near the puck either.

Yes. Dach said it himself, its not a hockey play. We can't have it both ways, we'll just look like f***ing clowns. I'd hate to look like a Sens fan or a Bruins fan they look so f***ing stupid most of the time, lets not be them.

Gonna disagree. That sets a weird precedent where then you can call any interference or hit in a heated game a suspension. He made no head contact and if you're going to suspend a player because your subjective opinion is you think he meant to hurt the other player then that opens just about every hit to possible suspension.
That's a pretty big stretch youre making. That wasn't just interference, that was, I am crossing the whole rink at full speed and have only one intent, and interference.
The problem is how can it be a hit with intent to injure when there wasn’t even a hit? Xhekaj completely missed Stutzle and just clipped his gloves. Stutzle smashed his own head in with his own stick. Xhekaj was already long gone.
The problem is that you can be charged with attempted murder if you miss while shooting your gun. It's the same principle. It's not because he missed or there was no injury, or no contact to the head that it wasn't stupid and predatory.
Stutzle would’ve been asleep on the ice if he wanted to hurt him.
He tried his best.
Every f***ing hit is "looking to hurt someone." That's literally the point of hitting. To hurt and wear down your opponents to make the game easier.

If you think Xhekaj was trying to hurt someone long-term, you're absolutely not thinking clearly. Xhekaj wanted to absolutely demolish Stutzle and make him irrelevant in the game at hand. I can pretty much guarantee that Xhekaj isn't trying to seriously injure someone.

If you think hitting should be removed from hockey? Fine. I can accept that honestly. But if you think it should be removed because someone was trying to injure someone? Then contact sports aren't for you.
Well the actual rule is "separating" a player from the puck, so no, not every hit is looking to hurt someone.

I'm also probably the biggest fan of physical hockey in the world, heck, I have endured more punishment and given out more punishment than you'll ever do in the last month alone, as I practice sports that are rooted in violence. With that said, we can't just be this emotional and be angry about the Greig hit and excuse Xhekaj. They are the same hit.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Natey

Habs

It's going to be a long year
Feb 28, 2002
22,862
17,698
There's not really much management can do about bad legacy contracts. Montreal hasn't really had much ability to change the roster meaningfully (without hurting the bigger objectives) and when they have, they've focused on more important areas like the top 6 or D. But Montreal's cap situation is only just now starting to get cleaned up.

no for sure, that's the issue right now and its really holding the team back.
 

Adriatic

Registered User
Feb 27, 2004
6,765
4,656
Xhekaj teammates must love him though. I expect a lot of noise from nerdy journalists, but anybody that's played this sport appreciates what Xhekaj does without hesitation. Can't have enough of those types. This wasn't the time to be patient and pick his spot.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,915
58,996
Citizen of the world
In the same vein of fair is fair, I doubt X would have gone after Stutzle if Greig hadn’t pulled his stunt on Dach. That’s not typically X’s style. Yes, he's taken dumb penalties, but not delivering Scott Stevens-hits like hits. It seems like he just reacted to the last two games. If the League or refs won’t step in, it’s good to see someone on the Habs step up and send a message
Yes, but then you have to be okay with the return of the pendulum. When it happens to our players because a dirty hit was done by a Hab, we better not whine like the Sens are doing, thats such a bad look.

There's no conspiracy against the Habs, it's gonna happen both ways.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,915
58,996
Citizen of the world
There's not really much management can do about bad legacy contracts. Montreal hasn't really had much ability to change the roster meaningfully (without hurting the bigger objectives) and when they have, they've focused on more important areas like the top 6 or D. But Montreal's cap situation is only just now starting to get cleaned up.
It's super easy to sit Gallagher down in the stand and hand him a beer and a hot dog and tell him to enjoy the game. It's literally so easy. We have more than enough cap space to NOT have this guy on the team.

Not a chance… if that’s truly what you believe there’s no discussion to have here.
1727887396930.png


Yes, he was clearly just going for a love tap, he didn't go in at full speed, left both his foot off the ice, took out the chicken wing and lean in with all his weight.

Clown post, honeslty.

When you say things like this, you're literally becoming a joke of a fan.
 

Adriatic

Registered User
Feb 27, 2004
6,765
4,656
Yes, but then you have to be okay with the return of the pendulum. When it happens to our players because a dirty hit was done by a Hab, we better not whine like the Sens are doing, thats such a bad look.

There's no conspiracy against the Habs, it's gonna happen both ways.
If a hab lays a dirty hit on an opposing player, I fully expect him to face the music.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,915
58,996
Citizen of the world
If a hab lays a dirty hit on an opposing player, I fully expect him to face the music.
Dirty hits have no place in hockey and it's in part why we've been robbed of great careers like Lindros, Crosby, Kariya and others. I love physical play but it can't be destroying careers. That kind of hit does exactly that.

Thats solely on a hockey standpoint too, then there's the people behind the hits too that suffer. It sucks overall.
 

BergevinBurner

Registered User
Sep 27, 2019
1,894
4,427
View attachment 911708

Yes, he was clearly just going for a love tap, he didn't go in at full speed, left both his foot off the ice, took out the chicken wing and lean in with all his weight.

Clown post, honeslty.

When you say things like this, you're literally becoming a joke of a fan.
From the front on angle to me it honestly looks like he was trying to drive a big hit through Stutzle'e chest, but since he just glanced him he ended up with his shoulder elevated as a natural part of the follow through. I don't see anything close to a chicken wing or attempted head shot.

 

Harry Kakalovich

Like and reply
Sep 26, 2002
6,567
4,932
Montreal
It's really frustrating with Xhekaj. He has to learn to stay on the ice. These exact problems got him sent down last year. There's a reason guys don't skate around meting out vigilante justice all over the NHL.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,915
58,996
Citizen of the world
From the front on angle to me it honestly looks like he was trying to drive a big hit through Stutzle'e chest, but since he just glanced him he ended up with his shoulder elevated as a natural part of the follow through. I don't see anything close to a chicken wing or attempted head shot.

You're debating millisecond body adjustments. It doesn't matter. He crossed the whole ice at full speed, launched himself full force and chicken winged himself into a player that had no puck for more than a second and it was a completely blindside hit.

There's no defending this. The puck left Stutzles stick before Xhekaj even decided to shift his hips into the hit.

1727888099509.png


Please don't be a homer.
 
  • Haha
Reactions: Natey

Natey

GOATS
Sponsor
Aug 2, 2005
62,845
9,391
I'm also probably the biggest fan of physical hockey in the world, heck, I have endured more punishment and given out more punishment than you'll ever do in the last month alone, as I practice sports that are rooted in violence. With that said, we can't just be this emotional and be angry about the Greig hit and excuse Xhekaj. They are the same hit.
Maybe you should know your audience before just spouting out bullshit pretending that you know for a fact that you live a more physical life than I do.
 

BergevinBurner

Registered User
Sep 27, 2019
1,894
4,427
It's really frustrating with Xhekaj. He has to learn to stay on the ice. These exact problems got him sent down last year. There's a reason guys don't skate around meting out vigilante justice all over the NHL.
When you lose a top 6 guy to a dirty play for half a season the previous game, then nearly lose another top 6 guy to a headshot in the current game then there's an argument that vigilante justice is needed.
You're debating millisecond body adjustments. It doesn't matter. He crossed the whole ice at full speed, launched himself full force and chicken winged himself into a player that had no puck for more than a second and it was a completely blindside hit.

There's no defending this. The puck left Stutzles stick before Xhekaj even decided to shift his hips into the hit.

View attachment 911714

Please don't be a homer.
I'm not arguing it was a clean hit. He deserved the penalty 100% and I understand why the refs tossed him from the game. But calling for a suspension for a play like that is foolish. By that logic I could argue all of Tkachuk, Xhekaj, Greig and Struble all deserve to be suspended because they all made plays that could have possibly had intent to injure.
 

Mrb1p

PRICERSTOPDAPUCK
Dec 10, 2011
91,915
58,996
Citizen of the world
When you lose a top 6 guy to a dirty play for half a season the previous game, then nearly lose another top 6 guy to a headshot in the current game then there's an argument that vigilante justice is needed.

I'm not arguing it was a clean hit. He deserved the penalty 100% and I understand why the refs tossed him from the game. But calling for a suspension for a play like that is foolish. By that logic I could argue all of Tkachuk, Xhekaj, Greig and Struble all deserve to be suspended because they all made plays that could have possibly had intent to injure.
Greig should get the exact same punishment yes.

Like Dach said, it's not even close to a hockey play.
 

BergevinBurner

Registered User
Sep 27, 2019
1,894
4,427
Buddy I just came back from a muay thai camp in thailand.


Greig should get the exact same punishment yes.

Like Dach said, it's not even close to a hockey play.
Tkachuk jumping Xhekaj could be argued as intent to injure and it's not a hockey play. Struble's hit on Greig was late and very likely had intent to injure or send a message. I just think it's a slippery slope to suspend a guy of perceived intent.
 

Ozmodiar

Registered User
Oct 18, 2017
6,340
7,672
I'm not arguing it was a clean hit. He deserved the penalty 100% and I understand why the refs tossed him from the game. But calling for a suspension for a play like that is foolish. By that logic I could argue all of Tkachuk, Xhekaj, Greig and Struble all deserve to be suspended because they all made plays that could have possibly had intent to injure.
It’s not a suspension, agreed.

If it was a headshot then it would have been a match penalty and would have landed on Gary’s desk. At first it looked that way with the chicken wing, but the replay showed otherwise. Instead, Interference and a game misconduct for it resulting in injury.
 

Harry Kakalovich

Like and reply
Sep 26, 2002
6,567
4,932
Montreal
When you lose a top 6 guy to a dirty play for half a season the previous game, then nearly lose another top 6 guy to a headshot in the current game then there's an argument that vigilante justice is needed.
Cedric Paré is a nobody. End of story.

I didn't like the Grieg hit, but the Xhekaj hit was a terrible play, all-around. Habs had the momentum and it turned on that play. Plus it looked like a cheap shot to me. Mind you, I think Stutzle is like the biggest diver in hockey, so hard to tell. But whatever. Point is, Xhekaj keeps getting played. If you're up 2-0, lots of players on the other team will want to start something. Xhekaj doesn't pick his spots. What's he gonna do, go crazy after every borderline hit that gets made against the Habs? He'll never be on the ice. And a player in the dressing room isn't much of a deterrent.
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad