Player Discussion Arber Xhekaj: The Sheriff

  • Work is still on-going to rebuild the site styling and features. Please report any issues you may experience so we can look into it. Click Here for Updates
Keep in mind we've been running an abnormal roster of 15 forwards and only 6 D. When Edmundson comes back we are much more likely to send a forward down and go with the more standard 14 F and 7 D. It's only once Matheson also comes back that we would actually send a D down (Assuming no other injuries between now and then).

Yeah but the spots are still the same.

None of Guhle, Xhekaj or Harris should be the 7th D in Montreal. Meaning that when Eddy returns, either some vet will have to sit, or one of those guys gets sent down.

I think Pezzetta will get waived and Wideman will sit, personally.
 
Wideman is absolute garbage.

As for Xhekaj, he would be #6 in my book if Eddy and Matheson were back, but if they see him as #7 behind Kovacevic, they will send him down, and that is normal. Young guys should not be #7.
For me, it’s Top-5 + Xhekaj. I would sit Kovacevic and Wideman before X. He’s invaluable and should always be a starter.
 
Yeah but the spots are still the same.

None of Guhle, Xhekaj or Harris should be the 7th D in Montreal. Meaning that when Eddy returns, either some vet will have to sit, or one of those guys gets sent down.

I think Pezzetta will get waived and Wideman will sit, personally.
Yeah for sure at this point Wideman is the guy who should be sitting as the #7 once Edmundson returns. Then if everyone is still healthy when Matheson returns we probably send one of those 3 down to the AHL and keep Wideman in the pressbox as it's better to have those guys playing in the AHL then sitting in the pressbox watching the NHL.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Canadienna
Yeah but the spots are still the same.

None of Guhle, Xhekaj or Harris should be the 7th D in Montreal. Meaning that when Eddy returns, either some vet will have to sit, or one of those guys gets sent down.

I think Pezzetta will get waived and Wideman will sit, personally.

Well I'm for keeping 8D.

But, I'd waive Dadonov, Drouin, and Hoffman before Pez.
 
Yeah for sure at this point Wideman is the guy who should be sitting as the #7 once Edmundson returns. Then if everyone is still healthy when Matheson returns we probably send one of those 3 down to the AHL and keep Wideman in the pressbox as it's better to have those guys playing in the AHL then sitting in the pressbox watching the NHL.
So you are playing Kovacevic over one of the three younger rookies? Because if not, then Kova would be #7 and Wideman can be sent to Laval. Or we keep 8D and waive two floating forwards instead of one.
 
Be great when the Sheriff meets Tkachuk and Ottawa where he can punish the kid for us not drafting him.
Shutting up gasbags like Tkachuk is exactly why X is an absolute fixture. Tkachuk will be yapping, acting like he owns our goalie’s crease, sucker punching, yapping some more and giving our Ds two-handers. Our players just look down and take it. Tkachuk does his clown show so much, that the refs most of the time don’t penalize him.

And getting Pezzetta to have his ass handed back to him again just emboldens them. And Tkachuk and the other clowns won’t magically stop intimidating and mogging us because Matheson and Edmonston are back.
 
So you are playing Kovacevic over one of the three younger rookies? Because if not, then Kova would be #7 and Wideman can be sent to Laval. Or we keep 8D and waive two floating forwards instead of one.
Yes I would play Kovacevic over one of the other rookies. It's not perfectly fair but the other guys can go down and play big minutes so it won't be bad for their development in the short term.
 
Yes I would play Kovacevic over one of the other rookies. It's not perfectly fair but the other guys can go down and play big minutes so it won't be bad for their development in the short term.
Ghule has been overmatched statically, which may be in part the effects of Savard despite all the praise that has been heaped on him for some eye-catching plays, and Xhekaj has appeared tough but raw and could benefit from more seasoning. Either of them swapping out for Edmonson, as they are all left defense, makes more sense than sitting Kovacevic and forcing someone to play out of position.

If we were trying to win now, the decision might be different, but, strange as it is to say because one can compromise the other, losses and player development should be our focus.
 
Yes I would play Kovacevic over one of the other rookies. It's not perfectly fair but the other guys can go down and play big minutes so it won't be bad for their development in the short term.
Well, if it's not fair, then Kova can be 7th.

Ghule has been overmatched statically, which may be in part the effects of Savard despite all the praise that has been heaped on him for some eye-catching plays, and Xhekaj has appeared tough but raw and could benefit from more seasoning. Either of them swapping out for Edmonson, as they are all left defense, makes more sense than sitting Kovacevic and forcing someone to play out of position.

If we were trying to win now, the decision might be different, but, strange as it is to say because one can compromise the other, losses and player development should be our focus.
Harris has played on the right side a lot in his career, and IK guess you have him there as well. But I would probably put Edmondson there too, as we did with Chiarot last year.
 
Ghule has been overmatched statically, which may be in part the effects of Savard despite all the praise that has been heaped on him for some eye-catching plays, and Xhekaj has appeared tough but raw and could benefit from more seasoning. Either of them swapping out for Edmonson, as they are all left defense, makes more sense than sitting Kovacevic and forcing someone to play out of position.

If we were trying to win now, the decision might be different, but, strange as it is to say because one can compromise the other, losses and player development should be our focus.
That's funny, because I'm thinking of keeping the younger players in the lineup with the exact reasoning. I'd play Harris on the right side instead of Kovacevic because Harris has played tons of RD at lower levels and may end up finding his niche in Montreal on the right side rather than the left side.

In the short term, with Edmundson and Matheson around, there will be less room on the left side. Even with Edmundson gone, Matheson will be there for the medium term and, near the end of that time span, Hutson may come along as another LHD to fit in.

Play Harris on RD now when formative errors matter less, not later when the team is expected to win and he's fighting for his life to stay in the lineup.
 
Shutting up gasbags like Tkachuk is exactly why X is an absolute fixture. Tkachuk will be yapping, acting like he owns our goalie’s crease, sucker punching, yapping some more and giving our Ds two-handers. Our players just look down and take it. Tkachuk does his clown show so much, that the refs most of the time don’t penalize him.

And getting Pezzetta to have his ass handed back to him again just emboldens them. And Tkachuk and the other clowns won’t magically stop intimidating and mogging us because Matheson and Edmonston are back.
He would slobberknocker Tkackuk
 
  • Love
Reactions: Habs13
Why would we be sacrificing long-term success?
Because your sitting Kovacevik and therefore likely to lose out on his development.

Shutting up gasbags like Tkachuk is exactly why X is an absolute fixture. Tkachuk will be yapping, acting like he owns our goalie’s crease, sucker punching, yapping some more and giving our Ds two-handers. Our players just look down and take it. Tkachuk does his clown show so much, that the refs most of the time don’t penalize him.

And getting Pezzetta to have his ass handed back to him again just emboldens them. And Tkachuk and the other clowns won’t magically stop intimidating and mogging us because Matheson and Edmonston are back.
Tkachuk is going to do all those things with or without Xhekaj in the lineup.
 
Because your sitting Kovacevik and therefore likely to lose out on his development.


Tkachuk is going to do all those things with or without Xhekaj in the lineup.
With X in, guaranteed Tkachuk won’t park in the blue paint and stay there chirping after the whistle.
 
With X in, guaranteed Tkachuk won’t park in the blue paint and stay there chirping after the whistle.
I pretty much guarantee he will. You don't become a star player, especially a pest/instigator type if you wilt in the face of an opponent's tough guy. Chara and Lucic didn't prevent Cooke from head hunting Savard, no goon/tough guy stops Gallagher from heading to the blue paint and mixing it up with the goalie, nothing stops Marchant from being a major pest and throwing cheap shots and chirping, etc...
 
  • Like
Reactions: ZUKI and Sagikev
That's funny, because I'm thinking of keeping the younger players in the lineup with the exact reasoning. I'd play Harris on the right side instead of Kovacevic because Harris has played tons of RD at lower levels and may end up finding his niche in Montreal on the right side rather than the left side.

In the short term, with Edmundson and Matheson around, there will be less room on the left side. Even with Edmundson gone, Matheson will be there for the medium term and, near the end of that time span, Hutson may come along as another LHD to fit in.

Play Harris on RD now when formative errors matter less, not later when the team is expected to win and he's fighting for his life to stay in the lineup.
Throughout the preseason, Harris looked as if he was struggling mightily on the right side, and now that he's been our most impressive defenseman, though he's accrued far less overt praise than Guhle, I'm loath to force him to adapt and throw him off while he's still acclimatizing to a role in which he's excelled.

He's in the lineup as a left defenseman above Guhle and Xhekaj on my depth chart, so I wouldn't wish to place him an an awkward position in which he will not be playing for the rest of his career.
 
  • Like
Reactions: tazsub3
Because your sitting Kovacevik and therefore likely to lose out on his development.
If Kova at 25 is not better than Xhekaj at 21 right now, then I do not think they should prioritize Kova's
"development". If Kova IS better right now, and Xhekaj is 7th, then sure send him down. Note that in 13 NHL games Kovacevic has yet to register a point, but again if he is better overall, then play him at #6 and send Xhekaj down while keeping Wideman as #7.

However, in most cases the guys 20-22 will develop faster than the 25 year old who has already done 3 years in the AHL after 3 years against men in the NCAA.
 
So you'd be ok sacrificing long term success just to be fair to a couple of rookies?

You won't be sacrificing long term success though so there goes that narrative out the window.

Not sure what I would do but there may be a guy who is playing with a nagging injury so we could rest that guy.
Wideman is penciled in as my depth guy. No way I want him taking up ice time in either AHL or NHL. For now he plays until both Matheson and Eddy are back.

Personally, I would not have a big issue with Wideman as the depth guy and we rotate between Wifi and Kova. It's not like you are married to this plan and can't change it after a few games.
 
  • Like
Reactions: jaffy27
I pretty much guarantee he will. You don't become a star player, especially a pest/instigator type if you wilt in the face of an opponent's tough guy. Chara and Lucic didn't prevent Cooke from head hunting Savard, no goon/tough guy stops Gallagher from heading to the blue paint and mixing it up with the goalie, nothing stops Marchant from being a major pest and throwing cheap shots and chirping, etc...
Your argument that on-ice deterrence of pests is a myth is obviously a debatable point. Gorton was specifically fired because Rangers ownership believed that this myth was actually a real life thing. Gorton was not protecting his team from cheap shots from the likes of Tom Wilson. He was fired.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Fandangle
If Kova at 25 is not better than Xhekaj at 21 right now, then I do not think they should prioritize Kova's
"development". If Kova IS better right now, and Xhekaj is 7th, then sure send him down. Note that in 13 NHL games Kovacevic has yet to register a point, but again if he is better overall, then play him at #6 and send Xhekaj down while keeping Wideman as #7.

However, in most cases the guys 20-22 will develop faster than the 25 year old who has already done 3 years in the AHL after 3 years against men in the NCAA.
By sending Xhekaj you aren't prioritizing one players development over another becuase Xhekaj and Harris for that matter have things they can learn in the AHL so whether they learn them in the AHL or NHL it doesn't hurt their development.

You won't be sacrificing long term success though so there goes that narrative out the window.

Not sure what I would do but there may be a guy who is playing with a nagging injury so we could rest that guy.
Wideman is penciled in as my depth guy. No way I want him taking up ice time in either AHL or NHL. For now he plays until both Matheson and Eddy are back.

Personally, I would not have a big issue with Wideman as the depth guy and we rotate between Wifi and Kova. It's not like you are married to this plan and can't change it after a few games.
So sitting Kovacevik for a long period of time won't impact his development? That's a novel take.
 
By sending Xhekaj you aren't prioritizing one players development over another becuase Xhekaj and Harris for that matter have things they can learn in the AHL so whether they learn them in the AHL or NHL it doesn't hurt their development.


So sitting Kovacevik for a long period of time won't impact his development? That's a novel take.
Oh my God, we are stunting Pezzetta's development too!
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad