I know they’re vastly different players, but would you have preferred Dickinson or Buuim?
get ready for a bit of a non answer lmao
i had those two ranked a couple spots ahead of silayev, that is true. my stance on the clock, though, was that i wouldve been happy with any of the LDs. all three presented good value, both in terms of pick return and organizational utility, and it felt fortunate that we had the freedom to choose because i wasnt convinced even one was gonna be available. the thing with drafts is its so rare to get
your personal, ideal pick that its hard to care too strongly about one, singular outcome (outside of like a nico vs nolan type debate)
i dont think its hard to claim that buium is a better prospect. the issue with picking him stemmed from our long term blue line composition. luke/nemo/zeev/casey is one of those things that sounds fun on paper but could run into issue in terms of dedicated play stopping/pking/physicality/so on. i cant take credit for the line because its too good, but i remember reading on here something to the effect of "picking zeev wouldve started a countdown to a casey trade" and i firmly believe that wouldve been the case, the unit wouldve been too redundant
dickinson is probably more debatable, but i did like him a bit more, and this offensive boom was fairly easy to predict for anyone who was paying attention. lots to like about his projection, even in spite of a rocky wjc, and a bit more of a two-way specialist than either of the other two options. if the team wanted the absolute best player on the defensive end, although i do like his projection there, he wasnt it
with silayev, they didnt just pick some boring defensive guy, they found a legitimately rare archetype of a player in the process. the one thing i really tried to drive home on draft night was that they nabbed a player who would make the lives of luke/nemo/casey
easier, which i would not have been able to say for the other two players (particularly buium). so, yes, in a vacuum, i wouldve preferred the other two slightly more, but in terms of overall roster benefit, i do believe we made the right choice
basically, i view it like im at the draft table. i would present my list, explain my preferences, and hear other arguments. if, and i assume this was the case, there were scouts in there pounding the table for silayev saying how desperately we needed to add him to our long term blue line outlook, i wouldnt have fought them on bucking my board, 3-11 (or w/e i had it at) was a tight enough range for me
the other thing to note is that i trust this regimes ability to find D talent at the draft, particularly out of russia, so when i hear marty leak that we had silayev ranked 4th, its not insignificant to me