KingsHockey24
Registered User
- Aug 1, 2013
- 14,704
- 13,552
Obviously I don't mind the trade at all but man ..
Brayden Schenn would've made an awesome LA King.
Brayden Schenn would've made an awesome LA King.
Woof.Can we have contest? Come up with a single word that describes Fiala
Full-time amateur scouts probably don't have a lot of time to commit to it. I'm sure there's digging on information through contacts and maybe some part-timers. And it's true you can't project too far out. But I think having one or two people full-time on the job would provide advantages. As for the roadmap...I was thinking if a team feels like maybe they will have to blow it up within the next 2-3 years and there's indications that maybe year 2 has two phenoms top of the draft class and a deep group, you could say that's the time to blow it up rather than a year later or the year earlier.
I don't post enough to understand how to quote in this forum, but building off of something Telos posted regarding Luc's comments, and yes this is going to be nothing more than me going blah blah blah.
I look at the Dodgers and Lakers and they make those league shaking moves. Obviously this is off the heels of the Doncic trade but the Dodgers signed Ohtani and basically every other major free agent they want. The Kings don't seem to have that same appeal or ability. Yes hard cap, yes top end players are rarely available via free agents or trades blah blah blah. But I see this organization as unwilling or unable to go out of their way to push for top 10 players. Maybe it's a management thing, maybe it's an ownership thing, I dunno I'm simply a fan but this is freakin Los Angeles. Players should WANT to come here.
...damn this forum has gotten me to post twice in a calendar year.
I still am not sold on him.Didn't have much faith in Hiller, thought he would be Todd 2.0(especially how they were playing in January) But he has good chemistry going and isn't afraid to shake up the lines. Congrats to Jim.
View attachment 974482
Sure, and when the playoffs roll around and he’s just finished running his geriatric #1 C into the ground for 82 games running 11/7, the results will speak for themselves.It’s a results oriented job
Whilst I’d like Kopitar’s minutes to get to about 18 it’s not the 11/7. The extra ice time tends to go to wingers + Byfield.Sure, and when the playoffs roll around and he’s just finished running his geriatric #1 C into the ground for 82 games running 11/7, the results will speak for themselves.
I know a lot of people think this way, but I fundamentally disagree.I think that his system is gonna be easily overcome in the playoffs when teams can concentrate on just how robotic and structured we are.
Whilst I’d like Kopitar’s minutes to get to about 18 it’s not the 11/7. The extra ice time tends to go to wingers + Byfield.
Kopitar is still #1 pk. He’s still #1 c. He’s still the go to in critical defensive situations. His old bones just can’t keep up anymore. And extra forward would help.Whilst I’d like Kopitar’s minutes to get to about 18 it’s not the 11/7. The extra ice time tends to go to wingers + Byfield.
I don’t disagree, I just don’t think 11/7 or 12/6 impacts his ice time. I’m hoping the uptick in the form of Danault and QB will make a difference though.Kopitar is still #1 pk. He’s still #1 c. He’s still the go to in critical defensive situations. His old bones just can’t keep up anymore. And extra forward would help.
Kopitar is in fact not #1 pk. He ranks 6th in penalty killing minutes per game on the Kings amongst the forwards at 1:05 per game. That makes him now the 3rd forward pairing when it comes to PK.Kopitar is still #1 pk. He’s still #1 c. He’s still the go to in critical defensive situations. His old bones just can’t keep up anymore. And extra forward would help.
Same with the other players they've just given away. Why get anything in return, when you can just give the olayer away instead. Not that Englind had much if any value.Interesting to waive Englund today. Would like to know the advantages of waiting until now.
Sabers are claiming him.Same with the other players they've just given away. Why get anything in return, when you can just give the olayer away instead. Not that Englind had much if any value.
Interesting to waive Englund today. Would like to know the advantages of waiting until now.
Andreas Englund
Following up on our previous article about what the Kings will look to do with their nine active defensemen once Drew Doughty returned to the lineup, the end of that road is drawing near. Their plan to hold an unprecedented number of blueliners on their roster was delayed slightly with the hand injury to Mikey Anderson. Yet, that is expected to change soon. From what we’re hearing, they’ll hold steady with the nine through the games this weekend against Dallas and Anaheim (i.e. in case of possible injury replacement issues). Then, come Sunday, we’re expecting Andreas Englund to go on waivers. It’s a move that will serve multiple purposes, including: saving cap space by having one less player on the roster, trimming to a more manageable eight rearguards (although that could be argued as still possibly being one too many on the roster), and ultimately creates a path toward another player potentially joining the team — either via a call-up or acquisition prior to the NHL Trade Deadline on March 7.
For his part, Englund was brought in during the summer of 2023 with a specific role in mind. He played all 82 regular season games with the Kings during 2023-24, his first year of a two-year contract carrying a $1M AAV. Set to become an unrestricted free agent this summer, the 29-year-old has seen action in 11 games thus far this season. Kings GM Rob Blake is believed to have been testing the waters on a possible trade for Englund over the past week. Should one materialize before Sunday, getting any asset back in return is almost always favorable. Should waivers be the only option remaining, and Englund cleared, he would then most likely be assigned to AHL Ontario. More on that to come in a few days.
Hes better off for it. Had they been riding him 25 minutes a night he would not have had the juice for that shift he scored late in the 3rd vs Dallas at this point in the season. It also takes pressure off him. If he was still their main go to guy hed have faced more criticism in the media in January and February. It was largely brushed off as his usual cold streak but other guys are getting minutes for a chance to pick up the slack. Its been a slow transition but were seeing progress.Kopitar is in fact not #1 pk. He ranks 6th in penalty killing minutes per game on the Kings amongst the forwards at 1:05 per game. That makes him now the 3rd forward pairing when it comes to PK.
View attachment 975185
He's also down to ~19 minutes per game and no longer the minutes leader amongst forwards on a per game basis. Over the past three games he has played the third, third, and second most minutes amongst centers on the Kings. Against the Canadiens he played less than 17 minutes.
I know if feels weird to think that Kopitar is not being overused, but he in fact is being used less under Hiller this year than he has been for any season in his 18.6 year career. He is effectively now the Kings 2nd line center with Byfield taking over.
I dunno, feels like I see him starting every pk but I’ll take your word for it.Kopitar is in fact not #1 pk. He ranks 6th in penalty killing minutes per game on the Kings amongst the forwards at 1:05 per game. That makes him now the 3rd forward pairing when it comes to PK.
View attachment 975185
He's also down to ~19 minutes per game and no longer the minutes leader amongst forwards on a per game basis. Over the past three games he has played the third, third, and second most minutes amongst centers on the Kings. Against the Canadiens he played less than 17 minutes.
I know if feels weird to think that Kopitar is not being overused, but he in fact is being used less under Hiller this year than he has been for any season in his 18.6 year career. He is effectively now the Kings 2nd line center with Byfield taking over.