Proposal: Another Pick In The Hull: OTT + DET + BUF

njx9

Registered User
Feb 1, 2016
2,161
340
Nope. Moving from #4 to #3 doesn't/shouldn't cost $18M in Cap Gold within a Flat Cap. Open Cap is a finite amount. Now if Det. got the bump to #3 + (something), then maybe it works for us.

the cap space might be irrelevant for the 2020/21. is it also irrelevant for the next two seasons as well? instead of renting out the cap space for 3 years, they could rent out the same cap space for 1 year three times. the return would be much better, than just to move up from 4 to 3 in this years draft.

Wholly depends on the payer difference between 4 and 3. I think it's *vast*, especially if Byfield slips past LA. What are you going to sell the rest of the cap for? Some late round firsts who have a statistically miniscule chance of being stars? Vastly different if the team just needed bodies, but I'd move all sorts of stuff to up my legitimate chances at getting an elite player. Again, if you don't think Stutzle is really any better than Raymond or Drysdale, fine, I can buy that to stay at 4. But in nearly every ranking I've seen, the top 3 this year are on a completely different tier than the next grouping, and include two guys who can likely play the position we've organizationally failed at filling for years. For a team that has, what, 3 guys who are going to need a meaningful contract in the next three years and has no business signing anything but fill-in FAs, there's plenty of spare cap to go around.
 

nickdawg95

scoutdawg
Jan 7, 2016
3,294
1,782
Name the 2C that Buffalo can acquire with the #8 pick...

Clearing Okposo's contract clears 6 million in cap space that can be used to sign a 2C...

Name a 2c that buffalo can sign with Okposo leaving ? Haula who's a 3c and we'd have to overpay for ? come on this convo is pointless you're just making your argument as we go. It's so stupid, your move is terrible everyone person who follows buffalo knows it's terrible, we're NOT in a cap crunch quite the opposite actually. no need to throw away the 8oa pick to get rid of okposo to then overpaid for a 3c like haula to play 2c in buffalo. so pointless

8oa + Prospects? value wise could get us Domi Monahan maybe cirelli if he shakes loose from tampa.
stepan/copp could be traded for as stop gaps

Deal is trash get over it
 

tsujimoto74

Moderator
May 28, 2012
30,630
23,402
Name the 2C that Buffalo can acquire with the #8 pick...

Clearing Okposo's contract clears 6 million in cap space that can be used to sign a 2C...

Cirelli, Domi/Danault, Monahan (give or take). And there are at least a half dozen middle 6 Cs we could get for a song because of their cap hits and the flat cap (e.g., Stepan).

Cap space is of absolutely no value if we can't use it. Free agents don't want to come to Buffalo even when the team is good. And we have a shitload of cap space already even with Okposo on the books. Oh, and you might want to check this free agent class for that 2C you think we can use that space to sign, because he ain't there.

Moving Okposo has no value at all to the Sabres right now, much less the 8th overall pick. I don't know why you insist on dying on this hill.
 
  • Like
Reactions: nickdawg95

Perennial

Registered User
Jun 27, 2020
3,492
1,523
Cirelli, Domi/Danault, Monahan (give or take). And there are at least a half dozen middle 6 Cs we could get for a song because of their cap hits and the flat cap (e.g., Stepan).

Cap space is of absolutely no value if we can't use it. Free agents don't want to come to Buffalo even when the team is good. And we have a shitload of cap space already even with Okposo on the books. Oh, and you might want to check this free agent class for that 2C you think we can use that space to sign, because he ain't there.

Moving Okposo has no value at all to the Sabres right now, much less the 8th overall pick. I don't know why you insist on dying on this hill.

Go read the first line in the OP...
 

krt88nc

Registered User
Oct 7, 2017
717
278
Fayetteville, NC
I'm not sure any of the teams involved would or should be interested, but at least it's another trade idea to discuss...


Ottawa out: #3, #21
Ottawa in: #4, #8

Detroit out: #4
Detroit in: #3, Okposo

Buffalo out: #8, Okposo
Buffalo in: #21


Sens move down 1 spot, but gain the 8th pick

Red Wings move up 1 spot to ensure they land Byfield or Stutzle

Sabres dump Okposo's contract while still having a pick in the 1st round


Oh brother, so we trade down 13 spots just to dump a contract! Holy stupid thing to do.
 

MarkusKetterer

Shoulda got one game in
Mikael Granlund could probably be had at a discount after the year he just had in Nashville...

Otherwise, Cozens should be up with the big club next season... pencil him in as the 2C

Granlund is a 3C. And I want Cozens on this team as a 2C in one instance: he forces it to happen. Or I guess also a 9-game trial, but that’s not really pencilling him there.

Regardless your proposal relies on only 1 thing: get Ottawa 3 top 10 picks. That’s all you care about without regards to any other teams needs, or wants.

EG: Larkin to the Sabres for #8 + Mitts (or Thompson or Johnson or Samuelsson) works for the Sabres and Wings (if they see their rebuild taking longer). Tierney + 2nd for Montour + 2nd (swap of 2nds if there’s a perceived discrepancy) works between Sabres and Sens. Fabbri + 2nd for Norris + 2nd and pick swap of #3 & #4 works between Sens and Wings.
 

Syckle78

Registered User
Nov 5, 2011
14,585
7,826
Redford, MI
Granlund is a 3C. And I want Cozens on this team as a 2C in one instance: he forces it to happen. Or I guess also a 9-game trial, but that’s not really pencilling him there.

Regardless your proposal relies on only 1 thing: get Ottawa 3 top 10 picks. That’s all you care about without regards to any other teams needs, or wants.

EG: Larkin to the Sabres for #8 + Mitts (or Thompson or Johnson or Samuelsson) works for the Sabres and Wings (if they see their rebuild taking longer). Tierney + 2nd for Montour + 2nd (swap of 2nds if there’s a perceived discrepancy) works between Sabres and Sens. Fabbri + 2nd for Norris + 2nd and pick swap of #3 & #4 works between Sens and Wings.
8 and your bust isn't getting Larkin.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Oddbob

Perennial

Registered User
Jun 27, 2020
3,492
1,523
Granlund is a 3C. And I want Cozens on this team as a 2C in one instance: he forces it to happen. Or I guess also a 9-game trial, but that’s not really pencilling him there.

Regardless your proposal relies on only 1 thing: get Ottawa 3 top 10 picks. That’s all you care about without regards to any other teams needs, or wants.

EG: Larkin to the Sabres for #8 + Mitts (or Thompson or Johnson or Samuelsson) works for the Sabres and Wings (if they see their rebuild taking longer). Tierney + 2nd for Montour + 2nd (swap of 2nds if there’s a perceived discrepancy) works between Sabres and Sens. Fabbri + 2nd for Norris + 2nd and pick swap of #3 & #4 works between Sens and Wings.

Just one man's opinion, but I think the asking price for Larkin would be Cozens + #8...
 

Perennial

Registered User
Jun 27, 2020
3,492
1,523
Granlund is a 3C. And I want Cozens on this team as a 2C in one instance: he forces it to happen. Or I guess also a 9-game trial, but that’s not really pencilling him there.

Regardless your proposal relies on only 1 thing: get Ottawa 3 top 10 picks. That’s all you care about without regards to any other teams needs, or wants.

EG: Larkin to the Sabres for #8 + Mitts (or Thompson or Johnson or Samuelsson) works for the Sabres and Wings (if they see their rebuild taking longer). Tierney + 2nd for Montour + 2nd (swap of 2nds if there’s a perceived discrepancy) works between Sabres and Sens. Fabbri + 2nd for Norris + 2nd and pick swap of #3 & #4 works between Sens and Wings.

Granlund put up 185 points over his last 221 games with Minnesota, so he could certainly qualify as a 2C...

And then he can slide down to 3C when Cozens is ready for 2C duties
 

Oddbob

Registered User
Jan 21, 2016
16,674
11,225
We take on a brutal 3 years left contract and all we get is to move up one lousy spot? No thanks! Maybe if you take Abdelkader back with it.
 

MarkusKetterer

Shoulda got one game in
Feel free to explain why...

Because the Sabres plan is that Mitts or Cozens is the eventual 2C. So either Granlund becomes an overpaid 3C OR the Sabres eventually lose him to Seattle. And then they find themselves looking for a 2C again until Mitts or Cozens eventually takes that spot.

The Sabres want a young 23-26 year old 2C. So basically (listed in my preferred order [not saying they’re available]) Cirelli, Larkin, Horvat, Tierney, McCann, Copp, White, Roslovic, D. Strome.

If not, someone who is older, can play 2C, and will not have to be protected in the expansion draft OR will not be that much of a loss is fine.
 

Halla

Registered User
Jan 28, 2016
14,727
3,779
haha wow Ottawa gets to move up to 8 from 21 in a stacked draft by dropping down 1 spot???

Drysdale + Perfetti >> Stultze + 21
 

Perennial

Registered User
Jun 27, 2020
3,492
1,523
Because the Sabres plan is that Mitts or Cozens is the eventual 2C. So either Granlund becomes an overpaid 3C OR the Sabres eventually lose him to Seattle. And then they find themselves looking for a 2C again until Mitts or Cozens eventually takes that spot.

The Sabres want a young 23-26 year old 2C. So basically (listed in my preferred order [not saying they’re available]) Cirelli, Larkin, Horvat, Tierney, McCann, Copp, White, Roslovic, D. Strome.

If not, someone who is older, can play 2C, and will not have to be protected in the expansion draft OR will not be that much of a loss is fine.

Granlund is 28, so he's got a few more years left of his prime...

What kind of contract are you expecting for Granlund?
 

tsujimoto74

Moderator
May 28, 2012
30,630
23,402
Granlund put up 185 points over his last 221 games with Minnesota, so he could certainly qualify as a 2C...

And then he can slide down to 3C when Cozens is ready for 2C duties

Except that he's a winger. He's as much an answer to Buffalo's 2C problems as Marcus Johansson was, i.e., not.
 

Perennial

Registered User
Jun 27, 2020
3,492
1,523
haha wow Ottawa gets to move up to 8 from 21 in a stacked draft by dropping down 1 spot???

Drysdale + Perfetti >> Stultze + 21

That's the idea though... if Ottawa gives up Stutzle/Byfield, it'll have to be for something worthwhile
 

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Ad