monitoring_string = "358c248ada348a047a4b9bb27a146148"
GDT: - Animal House, Bruins @ Devils, 7:30 TNT | Page 19 | HFBoards - NHL Message Board and Forum for National Hockey League
  • Xenforo Cloud upgraded our forum to XenForo version 2.3.4. This update has created styling issues to our current templates, this is just a temporary look. We will continue to work on clearing up these issues for the next few days and restore the site to it's more familiar look, but please report any other issues you may experience so we can look into. Thanks for your patience and understanding.

GDT: Animal House, Bruins @ Devils, 7:30 TNT

Status
Not open for further replies.
Captain3rdLine said:
I don’t get why big guys are automatically assumed to be potential ‘unicorns’ by some people. What makes Bahl a unicorn if he puts it together? He’s a big dude with a long reach. Not all that rare or hard to find in the league. Isn’t a great skater, doesn’t even play physical. The only really benefit to his height is his reach.

Okhotiuk is a much better skater and more physical and IMO a better defender. Bahl has him beat in reach and a bit better of a puck mover. That’s it really. Nothing special about Bahl.
Click to expand...
The reach and height matter in combination with the playmaking you see spurts of. I’m not saying I even like Bahl but you’ll spend time figuring out if he’s the real deal if you’re a GM. At the very least, he’ll return more in a trade, until one of them sticks as a bonafide NHL player.
 
Devs3cups said:
Maybe it's truly not your intention, but I honestly don't get why you keep clowning advanced stats in every single GDT. They're still a representation of what's going on on the ice and some people like seeing them.
Click to expand...
No - I really want to know - What I'm seeing is NJ dominating the game and wondering if the stats actually say that.

Also a little bit of poking fun because we seem to win every game with advanced stats and not on the ice.

It's a nice indicator but in the end if you win the stat battle and lose the games on a nightly basis, what are those stats telling you? How do you act on those stats? To me and my feeble mind, it's that this team can't finish and I want something done about it in the way of a move.

I'll stop

Guadana said:
If you are trying to trolling and bitching, how do you identify yourself and what kind of pronoun we should use?
Click to expand...
Bitch is cool - I'll go with that
 
Zajacs Bowl Cut said:
20222023-20558-5v5.png


dominating. Naturally no goals.
Click to expand...

Ulmark is 19-1-1 with league leading SV% (.936) and GA (1.94), it’s not surprising that we aren’t getting much by him.

8-1-0 on the road with two shut outs. His only two, against Columbus and the Colorado Injury Reports, so I would be disappointed if we got shut out here.

I’m not at the game because I have COVID, which I likely caught at the last Bruins game. Happy New Years!
 
Guttersniped said:
Ulmark is 19-1-1 with league leading SV% (.936) and GA (1.94), it’s not surprising that we aren’t getting much by him.

8-1-0 on the road with two shut outs. His only two, against Columbus and the Colorado Injury Reports, so I would be disappointed if we got shut out here.

I’m not at the game because I have COVID, which I likely caught at the last Bruins game. Happy New Years!
Click to expand...

we definitely had some fluke shots that should have gone in.
Rest up bud - look into the therapies.
 
Guttersniped said:
Ulmark is 19-1-1 with league leading SV% (.936) and GA (1.94), it’s not surprising that we aren’t getting much by him.

8-1-0 on the road with two shut outs. His only two, against Columbus and the Colorado Injury Reports, so I would be disappointed if we got shut out here.

I’m not at the game because I have COVID, which I likely caught at the last Bruins game. Happy New Years!
Click to expand...
Feel better, post more. That is all.
 
It feels like one of those games where we make one mistake, it's a goal against, and then we collapse.

Really hoping they buck that trend and get back to dominate 2nds with plenty of goals for
 
BostonDevil said:
No - I really want to know - What I'm seeing is NJ dominating the game and wondering if the stats actually say that.

Also a little bit of poking fun because we seem to win every game with advanced stats and not on the ice.

It's a nice indicator but in the end if you win the stat battle and lose the games on a nightly basis, what are those stats telling you? How do you act on those stats? To me and my feeble mind, it's that this team can't finish and I want something done about it in the way of a move.

I'll stop


Bitch is cool - I'll go with that
Click to expand...
It's all good man, you don't have to stop anything, that's not how I wanted to come across at all.

To me, if we lose and most advanced stats are in our favour, it's still a good sign. It means that even though we lose, we put up a fight and play our game. Sure, at the end of the day it's not worth "anything", it juste helps give perspective to the L's! Don't know if I'm being clear enough haha!
 
If they lose because they can’t put a couple past Ullmark people in here are gonna whine about the team not having finish, totally ignoring how ridiculously good he has been this season. Dude’s on pace to break records for Swedish born goaltenders.
 
We really need to get another home win too (a win period) as our record at home isn't good at all, relative to our overall record.

We've barely won more games than we've lost at home.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.

Latest posts

Ad

Upcoming events

Ad

Top
-->->