Seems to me, whether they recognize it or not, many posters here are judging Andersson, Howden, and even to some extent Chytil, as if they were top 1-3 picks with their expectations. Sure, we've seen guys like McDavid, Matthews, etc. come in and dictate play right away, but they are by far the exception – and indeed, that's why they were taken where they were. MOST players, including many that go on to become stars in the league, require several years of development post-draft before they hit their stride in the NHL. And that's even on top teams; bear in mind, the fact that the Rangers are such a shitshow actually makes it
harder for these young guys to succeed. Yoyo-ing them up and down is to be expected, and we should hardly be calling anyone a bust as a result; heck, I'd argue that the fact that they're having short stints of limited success at the NHL level so early after being drafted is a
good sign.
If you'd like some perspective on how they're doing in comparison to other players taken in their draft years, check out the following links, and click on the names of all the
other players taken outside the top 3-5 to see where
they're currently playing...
2016 NHL Entry Draft Picks at hockeydb.com
2017 NHL Entry Draft Picks at hockeydb.com
If Andersson and Howden are still struggling in 2-3 years, we can start to worry. For now, just remember, if they'd gone the college route, they'd be just 10-20 games into their sophomore/junior seasons...