Because expecting something a 26 year old NHLer to accomplish that he has never accomplished before is the perfect way to get frustrated.
I’m just saying if you’re expecting 30 goals, you might be disappointed. Hopefully I get pleasantly surprised and he exceeds my expectations!
With Anderson, I think part of the value is going to be defined in other ways. Of course, he still has to show that he belongs in the top 6, so there will a certain degree of competency expected from the point production standpoint, but that bar does not have to be set at 30 goals.
Other measures to consider are not as easily defined, such as whether he can create more offensive zone time through successful forechecks, and getting pucks loose..... less "one and done" types of shifts for Montreal. Retrieving pucks off forechecks, and winning pucks in board battles or loose pucks in the trenches has definitely been an issue for most of Montreal's forwards IMO.
Can he create more chaos in the tough areas, and liberate the smaller skilled guys a bit more to have better looks, and not to have them pre-occupied spending so much time in trying to regain puck possession themselves.
Part of the measure for me is not so much about how many goals Anderson scores, but whether his teammates are able to get more scoring opportunities as a result of what he brings. This may not reflect in his goals and assists, but it could have a positive impact on his linemates production.
With the number they arrived at contract wise, it seems to me that the anderson party looked at Tom Wilson as the comparable, and that is probably what Bergevin thinks he is paying for. As with Wilson, his entire value won't be wrapped up solely in goals and assists.